Re: Osama bin Laden dead
Pakistan as in the entire official government of Pakistan, as opposed to a few select members within just the intelligence community, as opposed to a few select members of Pakistan's government.
The first option is extremely unlikely - plausible deniability if nothing dictates this not happen.
Perhaps, and perhaps not. I very much doubt Pakistan wants to get into the drone hunting business. Agreed that they may be conveniently not seeing them.
I fully agree that it is far more convenient for OBL to die than stand trial, but not necessarily for the reasons you think. Nothing conspiracy about this view - merely that a trial has no upside for the US except for that little detail about the rule of law.
But then again, we all know that the rule of law is already out the door...
As above - there is no upside to transparency. Once you've embarked into the realms of propaganda and departed even a semblence of rule of law.
As it turns out, it appears OBL wasn't even armed when shot:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...n002147D87.DTL
Always good to know we're better than the bad guys...
Pakistan may indeed have 'raped' the US over in Afghanistan, but far more likely Pakistan has just made the best of the opportunity presented to them.
I have yet to see any evidence whatsoever that the US presence in Afghanistan was in any way encouraged by Pakistan.
I think you are dreaming. The most likely result of increased conflict in Kashmir extending into open warfare is the neutralization of India as a force within the BRICs.
This is because the first thing that would happen if India is allowed to bring its full efforts to bear would be the entry of China on Pakistan's side - illicitly at first.
China also is quite conscious of India's presence on its southern border and wouldn't cry too much if the Aryans on the other side of the Himalayas decided to weed themselves down. In turn Russia would also play its part in keeping the regional conflict relatively free of outside influences - the last thing Russia wants is disorder bleeding over into unrest in its Central Asian CIS members. Having an India which has reunited the Indian subcontinent under the Hindu banner would be equally unacceptable.
Iran in turn would also welcome the opportunity to both expand its influence in the area around Iran as well as the opportunity to 'get in' with Pakistan in its hour of need.
A US-backed India would thus potentially be facing the entire rest of Central Asia and Asia, offset by only perhaps Bangladesh. Certainly it would be extremely unlikely for Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, etc to want to help their big and historically antagonistic neighbor.
Conflict in that region also sets back oil and gas exploration for decades, and also has serious security consequences for trade: Middle East to US, China to/from Europe, etc etc.
Let's also not forget that both Pakistan and India possess nuclear weapons.
Originally posted by ld
The first option is extremely unlikely - plausible deniability if nothing dictates this not happen.
Originally posted by ld
Originally posted by ld
But then again, we all know that the rule of law is already out the door...
Originally posted by ld
As it turns out, it appears OBL wasn't even armed when shot:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...n002147D87.DTL
Always good to know we're better than the bad guys...
Originally posted by ld
I have yet to see any evidence whatsoever that the US presence in Afghanistan was in any way encouraged by Pakistan.
Originally posted by ld
This is because the first thing that would happen if India is allowed to bring its full efforts to bear would be the entry of China on Pakistan's side - illicitly at first.
China also is quite conscious of India's presence on its southern border and wouldn't cry too much if the Aryans on the other side of the Himalayas decided to weed themselves down. In turn Russia would also play its part in keeping the regional conflict relatively free of outside influences - the last thing Russia wants is disorder bleeding over into unrest in its Central Asian CIS members. Having an India which has reunited the Indian subcontinent under the Hindu banner would be equally unacceptable.
Iran in turn would also welcome the opportunity to both expand its influence in the area around Iran as well as the opportunity to 'get in' with Pakistan in its hour of need.
A US-backed India would thus potentially be facing the entire rest of Central Asia and Asia, offset by only perhaps Bangladesh. Certainly it would be extremely unlikely for Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, etc to want to help their big and historically antagonistic neighbor.
Conflict in that region also sets back oil and gas exploration for decades, and also has serious security consequences for trade: Middle East to US, China to/from Europe, etc etc.
Let's also not forget that both Pakistan and India possess nuclear weapons.
Comment