I've come across some interesting analysis in The Economist over the last week or so with regard to the cost of real estate in China. The first article talked about the fall in real estate values over the last year in China, (about 5%), and capital outflows to Hong Kong. Yuan held in Hong Kong banks has grown from ~$13B US equivalent in 2010 to ~$150B. The Hang Seng index is also up almost 20% over the last 6 weeks. This may or may not be directly related to mainland outflows but it's certainly coincident.
What I found most revealing in these articles is the relative value of real estate. When looking at Chinese real estate through different value filters it offers starkly different views. To keep the chart clean I've narrowed the comparisons to China, Australia, Canada and the US. There's a link at the bottom of the post if anyone wants to look at other markets. When viewed through the lens of growth, China and Australia are clearly moving up much faster than the US or Canada. It almost makes the Canadian housing bubble look provincial.

But if you change the filter to focus on the cost of real estate vs. local income, we see a completely different outcome. When viewed through the lens of income growth in China, Chinese real estate is very inexpensive compared to Australia or Canada.

And if we take a 3rd view of real estate cost, the competitive view, we begin to see why real estate costs in China have begun to fall. As any real estate investor knows, the local value of real estate is always compared to rents. If the monthly cost of owning real estate is a lot more than renting, one of two things will happen, rents will move up or real estate values will fall. When viewed through this filter it can be seen that the Chinese market is somewhat over valued but the Australian market is very problematic and the Canadian market is in deep trouble over the next few years.

There are several economic levers that may be pulled over the next few years in China and depending on which ones you believe will be thrown, you can argue that Chinese real estate is a bargain or that it is over valued. It looks to me like the over supply of product is causing the contraction in prices more than a raw over valuation.
http://www.economist.com/blogs/daily...l-house-prices



Leave a comment: