Originally posted by Tulpen
View Post
-
Re: Cramer Video Takedown Contest
Parody is our way of doing that. You can tell folks not to watch Cramer or you can show them the real Cramer and let them decide for themselves. Problem is, try to show the real Cramer and you're going to get threatened with a law suit. That's the way our corrupt system works. -
Re: Cramer Video Takedown Contest
Good thing.Originally posted by FRED View Post
The same ought to be said about Cramer. Why waste one's time watching this show, even if it would be to find inconsistencies?
A better thing to do IMHO would be to advice members not to watch this show as it is a total waste of time.Leave a comment:
-
Re: Cramer Video Takedown Contest
Y'all are arguing the wrong question/prediction. The real one is when Cramer finally moves to Comedy Central.Leave a comment:
-
Re: Video Contest for the Gold
Well it's my first ITulip contest so here goes...
February 26th 2008 at 10.28am GMTLeave a comment:
-
Cramer Video Takedown Contest
Below is a video created by DonHarrold.net. (Hat tip to iTuliper lb for finding it.) In it Don shows a classic Jim Cramer switcheroo. First he says one thing, then the exact opposite with equal conviction a few months later after the market has turned against him without admitting that he's changed his position 180 degrees. We noted this tendency way back in 2000 and gave Jim Cramer an award for his not so deft switching from bull to bear after his audience got their asses handed to them following his bullish advice into the 2001 bear market. He did it all over again with the housing bubble. We created a video to show it and posted it to YouTube.com.
But it didn't stay up for long. Below is the letter we received from TheSteet.com's General Counsel Teresa Santos. Apparently TheStreet.com doesn't like it when web sites use clips of their show to reveal their boy Jim's – how shall we say – "inconsistency." TheStreet.com doesn't mind sites using clips of TheStreet.com that are complimentary of Jim, as we have done on occasion. It's only the critical videos that violate TheStreet.com's copyright.
In the unanimous opinion of dozens of iTulipers polled, including a few lawyers, the video constituted fair use and iTulipers urged us to take them on, but our advisers convinced us that we have better things to do than spend hundreds of thousands of dollars and who knows how many hours of our time fighting TheStreet.com over our fair use rights, so we made the video unavailable as TheStreet.com requested.
...................................
Right-click to enlarge.
Let's make it a contest! The first registered iTulip member to most accurately guess the date and time when YouTube.com takes down the video wins an English gold sovereign. The standard for the English monetary system for centuries, the gold sovereign contains 0.2354 oz of gold. At the time of this posting, a gold sovereign has a retail purchase price of $239 retail in the US.
You may post only one guess to this thread and in the following date/time format: e.g., March 12, 2008 at 12PM ET.
Good luck!
(Sorry, iTulip employees, contractors, writers, sponsors, and affiliates are not eligible.)
Oh, and don't forget to watch the TheStreet.com "approved" Cramer video satire.
iTulip Select: The Investment Thesis for the Next Cycle™
__________________________________________________
To learn about the Next Bubble, sign up for one year of iTulip Select by February 29, 2008 and receive the February 2007 issue of Harper's Magazine with Eric Janszen's cover article The Next Bubble free.
For the safest, lowest cost way to buy and trade gold, see The Bullionvault
To receive the iTulip Newsletter or iTulip Alerts, Join our FREE Email Mailing List
Copyright © iTulip, Inc. 1998 - 2007 All Rights Reserved
All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Nothing appearing on this website should be considered a recommendation to buy or to sell any security or related financial instrument. iTulip, Inc. is not liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. Full DisclaimerLast edited by FRED; February 14, 2008, 05:47 PM.
Leave a comment: