Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fukushima: Little by Little . . .

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Re: Fukushima: Little by Little . . .

    Wednesday 8 June 2011

    Molten nuclear fuel in three reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi power plant is likely to have burned through pressure vessels, not just the cores, Japan has said in a report in which it also acknowledges it was unprepared for an accident of the severity of Fukushima.

    It is the first time Japanese authorities have admitted the possibility that the fuel suffered "melt-through" – a more serious scenario than a core meltdown.

    The report, which is to be submitted to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said fuel rods in reactors No 1, 2 and 3 had probably not only melted, but also breached their inner containment vessels and accumulated in the outer steel containment vessels.

    The plant's operator, Tokyo Electric Power (Tepco), says it believes the molten fuel is being cooled by water that has built up in the bottom of the three reactor buildings.


    The most urgent problem facing workers at Fukushima Daiichi is how to deal with vast quantities of highly radioactive water that has accumulated in reactor buildings and basements and in ditches.

    The estimated 100,000 tonnes of contaminated liquid – runoff from water used to douse overheating reactors – is hampering efforts to repair the plant's cooling systems.

    Tepco has said it hopes to have a system in place by the middle of the month to remove radioactive substances from the water, enabling it to be reused to cool reactors.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011...t-melt-through

    Comment


    • #77
      Re: Fukushima: Little by Little . . .

      Going back to the solar thing, how much would a 40,000 km superconducting cable cost? If we run one around the earth, then we can hook up everyone's solar panels to it, and move the energy much closer to where it is needed with no cost to transfer. I assume the capital cost to build the line initially would be in the hundreds of billions, but the usefulness would unbelievable. Yes, I realize political realities make this unfeasible, but it is a grand scheme to dream about

      Comment


      • #78
        Re: Fukushima: Little by Little . . .

        http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/351e4...dc0,s01=1.html

        Superconducting cables, in which liquid nitrogen is used as a wire coolant, can carry about 10 times as much power as copper wires using the equivalent space.

        Although the cables are more expensive, the total costs of connection are about the same, the companies believe, because installation of the more compact cables is cheaper.

        American Surperconductor estimates that installing a 1,000-mile superconducting system would cost about $8bn-$13bn, “in the same general ballpark” as a conventional system.
        $8 billion to $13 billion for 1000 miles expanded to the 25000 Earth circumference yields a mere $200 billion to $325 billion. Of course this doesn't help those who don't live right on the Equator.

        The United States is approximately 3000 miles wide, but has 180,000+ miles of transmission grid. Replacing that with superconductors would cost $1.5 trillion to $2.44 trillion.

        Comment

        Working...
        X