Originally posted by goldisliberty
View Post
I also check in with Sinclair regularly to get his take on things. He's brilliant and from what I understand as a layman he's fairly well connected. It pays to listen to Jim Sinclair.
Having said that he writes with some of the most obscure language. I find myself reading half his posts literally six times over to pull out the points he's making. Sinclair is "thunderous" in his condemnation and analysis, while iTulip, in the hands of E.J. and the senior contributors are more "delicate". Delicate is a misleading term though as these iTuliper's are picking apart the carcasses of failing (all the "dead men walking") and defunct financial institutions with the sentimentality of an forensic surgeon conducting an autopsy of a cadaver (pass the high speed buzzsaw please - scalpel!).
In spite of making sometimes harsh sounding challenges (that's just the way I communicate because I have poor manners - sorry!), I extend my full respects to C1ue, who is one of these archetypical, slightly cold-blooded iTulip financial cadaver dissecters (I surmise C1ue likes to pick through the cadaver entrails to figure out exactly what the deceased bank ate for it's last supper, like an entomologist reslishes collecting skewered bugs. :rolleyes
.But in light of Sinclair's summary above, and in a typically iTulip response, I think someone like Finster for example would be inclined to pick this phrase apart, with an eye to letting out a little of the steam: << When an OTC derivative fails to perform, notional value becomes real value. >>
Much of Sinclair's observations above, as to the quantity of inflationary chips on the table which will require oceans of fiat paper to close out, hinges on this one sentence - but probably strictly speaking that $500 trillion of notional value does not automatically become real value - so there's some room in there to pin Sinclair back into his chair a little bit?
Having said that, in the broadest lines Sinclair is a formidable proponent of the simple idea that this entire mess resolves itself in terms of a degree of currency debasement which understatement might call "very rapid".
He's fantastic in the amount of time he makes himself available to the public with lots of really good guidance. The man has a real degree of selflessness in his message.The very fact that Sinclair makes this central to his entire view of what's to come, at least from an iTulipers perspective, seems a quantum leap ahead of the Mish's and Ackerman's understanding of how things will play out, and most notably, a quantum leap ahead of the Prechter's of this world, who get a hell of a lot of press and propagate some really wobbly interpretations (in my view anyway). Sinclair has it right, and these other zippity doo-dahs have it most egregiously wrong.
The best part of iTulip is that we have people here who take can take Sinclair's own thesis of currency debasement and can parse it down actually a lot more precisely than Sinclair, in that they pick apart precisely which strands of the above "500 Trillion notional value" are going to really command the issuance of fresh fiat to close out. This is the kind of nitpicky, detailed forensics that brings out the hidden wonk in so many of the great contributors here, and we have some truly formidable wonks in this community! ( :p ).
I think iTulip is very much on the same page as Sinclair - but they write better, and make some of the really complex parts real clear so that the rest of us average joes and joettes are steadily getting a stronger grip on what's developing. Still, in moments of doubt, like after this hellacious PM correction, Sinclair's "fire and brimstone" together with the quite evident ring of authority in his general grasp of the broad trend of events, helps us to get back on the main track.
We need, when all is averaged out over the next decade, to stop hopping around perennially anxious about second-guessing KA, and position the bulk of our assets steadily and calmly for - I N F L A T I O N. You and I may think this. Others here may not. We'll keep plugging that viewpoint, and over the larger span of time, I'm betting we'll be in the right, most of the time.
Leave a comment: