Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A look at Union Pacific's 3Q volume compare to earnings

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A look at Union Pacific's 3Q volume compare to earnings

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...ff1809eb5a37ed

    By The Associated Press – 20 minutes ago
    Union Pacific Corp. reported a 16 percent increase in third-quarter earnings on Thursday, as higher prices made up for sluggish volume growth and high fuel prices.

    Here's a look at the railroad's shipping categories and how they performed:

    Agricultural — Volume down 3 percent, revenue up 9 percent

    Automotive — Volume up 10 percent, revenue up 23 percent

    Chemicals— Volume up 5 percent, revenue up 14 percent

    Energy — Volume up 7 percent, revenue up 21 percent

    Industrial Products — Volume up 8 percent, revenue up 24 percent

    Intermodal — Volume down 6 percent, revenue up 8 percent

  • #2
    Re: A look at Union Pacific's 3Q volume compare to earnings

    Thanks, babbittd.

    chemicals, industrial products and energy( I presume mostly coal) all up are pretty hopeful.

    I'd love to see a long-term chart across all carriers to see if UP just took market share, or if it's just a small uptick within a big long-term decline.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: A look at Union Pacific's 3Q volume compare to earnings

      volume down, revenue UP - this looks more like inflation in freight rates than anything else?

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: A look at Union Pacific's 3Q volume compare to earnings

        Originally posted by thriftyandboringinohio View Post
        Thanks, babbittd.

        chemicals, industrial products and energy( I presume mostly coal) all up are pretty hopeful.

        I'd love to see a long-term chart across all carriers to see if UP just took market share, or if it's just a small uptick within a big long-term decline.
        One of them is CSX corp.

        http://services.corporate-ir.net/SEC...Rpb25JbmMucGRm

        skip to page 18
        Merchandise

        Agricultural

        Agricultural Products- Volume decreased due to reduced demand for feed shipments as a result of limited supply, higher corn prices and decreased production from producers of poultry and pork.

        Phosphates and Fertilizers - Shipments of fertilizers grew as farmers used more fertilizer to improve crop yields in response to high crop prices.

        Food and Consumer - Volume declined due to decreased shipments of alcoholic beverages and appliances caused by higher beer inventories and continued weakness in the housing sector, respectively.

        Industrial

        Chemicals - Volume was flat as strength in demand for intermediate products, used in manufacturing consumer goods and automobiles, was offset by weakness in plastics due to high inventories. Intermediate products are key inputs in the production of both durable and nondurable goods as well as packaging.

        Automotive - Automotive volume grew as a result of increased North American automotive production.

        Metals- Volume growth was driven by higher domestic steel production resulting from strong demand from the automotive and energy sectors for products such as sheet steel and pipe. This increased production, along with international demand, resulted in a large increase in scrap shipments.

        Housing and Construction

        Emerging Markets- Volume increased due to improved shipments of cement, aggregates (which include crushed stone, sand and gravel) and waste as a result of overall growth in these markets.

        Forest Products - Volume increased, despite the weakness in housing-related markets, with strength in shipments of pulp board and paper used in packaging for consumer products and a slight increase in demand for building products as a result of storm-related damage and low inventories.

        Coal Shipments of utility coal declined as electrical generation was flat in the eastern U.S., natural gas prices remained low and utility stockpiles were slightly above target levels. This decrease was partially offset by higher export shipments driven by greater demand for U.S. coal in Europe, Asia and South America. The increase in revenue per unit reflects improved yield, fuel recovery and positive mix.

        Intermodal

        Volume was flat as growth in domestic shipments was offset by weakness in international volume. Domestic shipments increased as higher fuel prices led to over-the-road conversions. International volume declined due to difficult comparisons from an early peak shipping season in 2010, versus a later, more moderate peak shipping season this year. The increase in revenue per unit primarily reflects higher fuel recovery due to rising fuel prices and yield improvement.

        Other

        Other revenue decreased due to lower contract volume commitments and incidental charges partially offset by higher affiliate revenue.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: A look at Union Pacific's 3Q volume compare to earnings

          Originally posted by lektrode View Post
          volume down, revenue UP - this looks more like inflation in freight rates than anything else?
          lektrode, look again please.
          volume shows up on those key industrial items at Union Pacific.
          More tons of coal, more tons of basic chemicals, more tons of industrial equipment.

          Unfortunately, later post for CSX somewhat disagrees, implying perhaps UP just grew it's market share for this freight

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: A look at Union Pacific's 3Q volume compare to earnings

            http://www.aar.org/NewsAndEvents/Rai...ndicators.aspx

            Look at this report. This if for entire industry for both U.S. and Canada. Very informative.
            Total car loads up 1.1% for Sept y-o-y. Further breakdowns are available in the report.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: A look at Union Pacific's 3Q volume compare to earnings

              Originally posted by charliebrown View Post
              http://www.aar.org/NewsAndEvents/Rai...ndicators.aspx

              Look at this report. This if for entire industry for both U.S. and Canada. Very informative.
              Total car loads up 1.1% for Sept y-o-y. Further breakdowns are available in the report.
              Excellent find, chaliebrown, very informative report ( and well written,with a sense of humor)

              Sadly, it shows me no green shoots. Looks like rail is now moving a somewhat higher percentage of the freight than other modes, and there might be a tiny little up-tick that is way down in the noise and doesn't seem important when seen in context over several years and the whole industry.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: A look at Union Pacific's 3Q volume compare to earnings

                Along the same lines the Ceridian-UCLA Pulse of Commerce Index gives real time data on diesel use by truckers. It nicely correlates with GDP data and comes out before that data.


                http://www.ceridianindex.com/

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: A look at Union Pacific's 3Q volume compare to earnings

                  Originally posted by thriftyandboringinohio View Post
                  lektrode, look again please.
                  volume shows up on those key industrial items at Union Pacific.
                  More tons of coal, more tons of basic chemicals, more tons of industrial equipment.
                  ....
                  roger that T&B - was a bit too quick off the hip on that one - guess i should've said/meant to say that if the volume went by x %, but revenue went up by x-more%, isnt that indications of the rates going up as well?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: A look at Union Pacific's 3Q volume compare to earnings

                    The frame of reference is missing.

                    The earliest aar.org data posted on iTulip is from a jk post in 2009:

                    http://www.ww.itulip.com/forums/show...ts-1993-Levels

                    Looking at the categories in that post vs. the latest data (September 12, 2009 vs. October 15, 2011) as well as vs. the same period of 2011 (September 10, 2011) yields the following comparisons:

                    Week Total weekly traffic YTD traffic YTD vs 2008
                    12-Sep-08 328,250 11,707,834
                    12-Sep-09 263,349 9,549,297 -18.44%
                    10-Sep-10 278,150 10,226,398 -12.65%
                    10-Sep-11 278,382 10,411,861 -11.07%
                    15-Oct-10 303,334 11,730,046
                    15-Oct-11 303,363 11,935,013
                    So the good news is - it isn't as bad as 2009. Only down 11% vs. 2008.

                    As you can see from the October 2010 and October 2011 levels, we're only 1 month behind or so.

                    Of course 2009 was apparently 1993 levels. Are we back up to the this millenium's levels yet?

                    Note also the original rail traffic link: http://www.itulip.com/forums/showthr...8great-link%29

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: A look at Union Pacific's 3Q volume compare to earnings

                      Agricultural Products- Volume decreased due to reduced demand for feed shipments
                      as a result of limited supply, higher corn prices and decreased production from
                      producers of poultry and pork.

                      Phosphates and Fertilizers - Shipments of
                      fertilizers grew as farmers used more fertilizer to improve crop yields in
                      response to high crop prices.
                      Lots of issues around ag meats. Expect meat prices to go up in the coming year. Drought forced a lot of animals to early slaughter.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X