Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Strategic Defaults

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Strategic Defaults

    The greatest fear lenders have concerning the herd of underwater borrowers is that loan owners may stampede to the exit. If the masses come to believe they will get years of free housing -- which they will -- or if loan owners believe the consequences of default are minor -- which they are -- or if underwater borrowers believe prices aren't coming back soon -- which they aren't -- then collectively the masses may all default and totally crush the banks and our banking system.



    Lenders have tried everything to prevent borrowers from defaulting. First it was an appeal to morality. This strategy has failed so miserably, that I have concluded the moral issue is really on the side of borrowers. In fact, strategic default is moral imperative to prevent future housing bubbles. Lately, lenders have been resorting to terrorist tactics to prevent default. Despite its limited success, lenders will continue using these tactics as it's the only defense they have left.

    Strategic default is gaining momentum, and in places like Las Vegas where most of the housing stock is inhabited by loan owners who would greatly benefit from strategic default, efforts to get the heard to stampede resonate loudly. Show the herd how they benefit financially, and you can get them to move.



    Lawyers say public has misconstrued mortgage default ads


    By VALERIE MILLER
    Their television commercials about mortgage defaults ignited a debate about ethics and financial responsibility. Now, the two Las Vegas lawyers behind the ad campaign say people are misunderstanding their message.
    The Haines & Krieger TV spots advise homeowners that their friends and family are staying in their homes without paying on their mortgages, and offer to show clients how to do the same.

    But George Haines and David Krieger, the lawyers who appear in those ads, say the message is not that those homeowners with the means to pay should skip out on their mortgages.



    Actually, yes, the ads do tell loan owners they should skip out on their mortgages. In Las Vegas, with many loan owners 30% to 50% underwater facing payments double a comparable rental, they should strategically default.






    These attorneys are being wimps and offering lawyerly evasions. If they really wanted to tell people the truth, they should stand behind their words and the implications. Most of Nevada is so far underwater they should default. It's in the best interest of their families to do so.
    Rather, the commercials are offering a lifeline to people who might otherwise lose their homes through foreclosure. "The ad campaign is geared toward empowering consumers with information they did not have," Krieger said.
    The ad wants to empower people with the information to strategically default. More power to them.
    The commercials have brought business to Haines & Krieger, a law firm offering mortgage modifications, bankruptcies and short sales. But that increased business is not just from those people looking to bail on their financial responsibilities, Haines said. "These are people who are undergoing dire circumstances and need some time in their homes to get their lives together," he said.
    They need some time in their homes? Is there some reason they couldn't spend that time in a rental? These guys should at least make their bullshit pass the giggle test.


    Lenders, real estate professionals and consumer advocates have criticized the TV spots. Nasser Daneshvary, the director of the Lied Institute for Real Estate Studies at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, worries about the devastating ripple effect of people bailing on their mortgages. "When you dump your house, you increase the odds that your neighborhood will become blighted, or a rental community," he said. "You are in turn damaging Clark County and the greater community."
    Egad! A rental community! The horror of it.

    The blight argument is nonsense. Mr. Daneshvary is wrong on many levels. First, his contention that rental communities are blight is ridiculous. Blighted areas often are inhabited by renters paying low rents because they are undesirable and nobody wants to live there. The blight comes first, and the habitation by renters paying very little comes second. It's not the other way around.




    The extension of his argument that renters lead to blight which damages the greater community is insulting to all renters. Based on his statements, I conclude he is a loan owner who probably should strategically default but doesn't have the courage to pull the trigger. If he owns in Las Vegas, he is almost certainly under water. Nearly 90% of owners are.
    But the Haines & Krieger partners say their ads are simply letting distressed homeowners know they have options, and need not just sit and wait for eviction after receiving a foreclosure notice.
    That is not accurate. Their ad is aimed at people who are currently paying their mortgages but considering default. The target market for this ad has not received a foreclosure notice.
    "Most of our clients really can't afford their mortgages and need a modification," Haines said. "You have people who can't afford their mortgages and can't get the lenders to negotiate with them."

    Krieger says many clients work out loan modifications and avoid foreclosure. "We don't advocate foreclosure," Krieger said. "It will ruin their credit."
    Short sale or foreclosure will ruin their credit, and the missed payments required to get a loan modification hurts a borrower's credit too. And the truth is strategic default consequences minor and likely to decrease.
    Daneshvary is skeptical of the lawyers' explanation. Viewers, he says, are smart enough to get the point of the TV spots. "As for the ad itself, as consumers, we know what the message is, 'Follow your neighbor by getting out of monthly payments,' " he said.
    Yes, that is exactly the point of the ad. It's unfortunate the attorneys felt they couldn't simply admit it.


    Michele Johnson, president and CEO of Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Nevada and Utah, said she believes the Haines & Krieger spots are encouraging people to strategically default on their mortgages.
    Yes, the ads are encouraging strategic default.
    "I find it irresponsible advertising," she said. "I think it certainly attempts to legitimize defaults."
    I'm sorry to inform Ms. Johnson, but defaults have already been legitimized. Strategic mortgage default has become common and accepted in 2011.
    The number of people still living in their homes with delinquent mortgages is hard to calculate, Daneshvary adds. Because out-of-state investors bought multiple houses in Southern Nevada during the real estate boom, many foreclosed homes were never occupied full time.

    However, Daneshvary estimates about 30 percent of Las Vegas Valley homes are now in some stage of loan delinquency.


    A 30% delinquency rate is astonishingly high. It is reasonable given the circumstances. If a 30% delinquency rate is maintained long enough, 90% of the housing stock will turn over as the 30% in delinquency is turned over three times.
    The option of strategically defaulting on your mortgage has been gaining in popularity over the last few years. A Nevada Association of Realtors report released in January found that 23 percent of those surveyed "walked away" as part of a strategic default.
    And another 77% failed to admit it... I made that up, but it is not far from the truth.
    Johnson points to the damage a mortgage default does to a person's credit: About a 100-point drop in the credit score as a result of the first missed house payment, and another approximately 100 points off when the second mortgage payment is missed.
    As I pointed out above, strategic default consequences minor and likely to decrease. The scare tactic on hurting a FICO score doesn't work anymore, just like the morality issue not longer holds sway.



    Nonprofit services, including Consumer Credit Counseling, will help people get loan modifications for free, she said.

    In response to all the criticism, Haines notes that plenty of Southern Nevadans are already staying in their homes without making payments, regardless of Haines & Krieger's commercials. ForeclosureRadar.com, a Discovery Bay, Calif.-based tracker of distressed real estate, said recently the average number of days it takes to foreclose on a home in Nevada rose to 319 days, up from 239 days a year ago.

    "Why are banks taking so long to foreclose? They don't have their ducks in a row," Haines said. "It is a product of the banks." Contact reporter Valerie Miller at vmiller@lvbusinesspress.com or 702-387-5286.
    The banks have their ducks in a row, they simply lack the balance sheet strength to write down all the bad debt, and if they did foreclose on everyone and put the houses for sale, they would so saturate the MLS with product the prices would get pushed back to 1970s levels while the market cleared out.


    http://www.irvinehousingblog.com/blog/comments/attorneys-criticized-for-advertisement-to-induce-strategic-default/?source=patrick.net


    chart tells all:



    the 'Sold Line' is the tight, measured hold banks have shown on releasing bad mortgage debt into the market, making 'free & easy' living possible while their shadow inventory explodes . . .


  • #2
    Re: Strategic Defaults

    When money has zero rent, why would anyone pay-back any debt? Pay-back a mortgage, for what, to put money into the bank to get zero interest? And mortgage interest is almost free, too, so it's a great game to stay in debt--- and maybe even to go deeper into debt.... Even better, skip payments on mortgages, strategically default, and then squat on the property for ten months or more.

    Here is another terrible result of Bernanke and Greenspan's total mis-management of monetary policy at the Federal Reserve Bank: worthless paper money, shoveled out the door of the Fed; money so cheap that it commands no rent, costs zero to borrow, so the deadbeats take an indefinite holiday in America and run-wild.

    Every economics student in America should just fling Samuelson's textbook on economics at their professors, and just withdraw from their economics courses.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Strategic Defaults

      Well done, Steven

      As Ray Charles asked, 'Can you feel it?'

      Affirmative . . .

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Strategic Defaults

        When the system fucks you to make the rich richer the only rational response is to fuck it back. Indeed, its the true American that strategiclly defaults, god bless those patriots.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Strategic Defaults

          We were pretty pleased with ourselves when we paid off our mortgage early several years ago. Now, theoretically, we should go get the max mortgage and join the default party. (Is defaulting on a home equity loan the same?)

          But I can't do that. It's not morality. It's being afraid to bet that big and the deep belief that debt should be avoided. We have decent incomes. We have money saved. And we're going to be screwed because of it.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Strategic Defaults

            Originally posted by LazyBoy View Post
            We were pretty pleased with ourselves when we paid off our mortgage early several years ago. Now, theoretically, we should go get the max mortgage and join the default party. (Is defaulting on a home equity loan the same?)

            But I can't do that. It's not morality. It's being afraid to bet that big and the deep belief that debt should be avoided. We have decent incomes. We have money saved. And we're going to be screwed because of it.
            This isn't about morality, it's about the mortgage holders not releasing the housing onto the market. It's time to wake up.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Strategic Defaults

              Originally posted by mesyn191 View Post
              When the system fucks you to make the rich richer the only rational response is to fuck it back. Indeed, its the true American that strategiclly defaults, god bless those patriots.
              "It is the true American that strategically defaults, God bless those patriots,"???????? Would you mind elaborating on this thought?

              And my other question to you and everyone else here to reflect upon and answer: Why did Keynsian economics and central bank policy work reasonably well worldwide during the economic downturn of the 1930s, but why is central bank policy and Keynsian economics such a manifest failure to-day, worldwide?

              The only answer that I can come-up with is that during the '30s, people lived on farms and were relatively isolated from the rest of the world. But nowadays, everyone is connected to everyone else on the internet. So central bank policies and their market manipulations are relatively common knowledge to everyone, everywhere. Central bank counterfeiting and paper dilution is manifest, so the markets take counter-measures to thwart central bank policies and activities..... Even the deadbeats in America, for example, have caught onto Bernanke's little game of diluting and de-valuing the dollar. Hence, we witness your comment above that deadbeats are patriots, God bless them.

              Even some of the central banks have caught onto this game, and they don't trust Bernanke nor his cronies in other central banks ( like Bernanke's choice of Marc Carney now heading the Bank of Canada ). So, central banks ( like the Bank of Russia, the Bank of Mexico, and the Peoples' Bank of China ) have been buying gold as a defensive counter-measure to the dollar dilution and de-valuation policies of the Federal Reserve Bank in Washington.
              Last edited by Starving Steve; August 03, 2011, 01:25 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Strategic Defaults

                Originally posted by Starving Steve View Post
                "It is the true American that strategically defaults, God bless those patriots,"???????? Would you mind elaborating on this thought?
                That is half joke and half serious. It should be noted that default in the face of onerous debt was thought to be a good thing once, especially since the alternative was debtor prisions and/or continued economic malaise while the bad debt was paid down. Now its all morality this and ideology that while mega corps and banks default all the time but call it a "restructuring" and no one seems to bat an eyelash. Especially those who like to harp on about morality and ideology, that only seems to apply to individuals and not corps or banks for some reason.

                Originally posted by Starving Steve View Post
                Why did Keynsian economics and central bank policy work reasonably well worldwide during the economic downturn of the 1930s, but why is central bank policy and Keynsian economics such a manifest failure to-day, worldwide?
                Because most if not all the world's central banks and governments seem to be corrupt or incompetant and have FIRE economies that they want to support. No conspiracies necessary or failure of Keynsian economics either.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Strategic Defaults

                  Originally posted by mesyn191
                  When the system fucks you to make the rich richer the only rational response is to fuck it back. Indeed, its the true American that strategiclly defaults, god bless those patriots.
                  This isn't about emotion - revenge or otherwise.

                  Strategic default should be a straight business/financial decision.

                  The problem is it seems many people can't execute on straight decisions.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Strategic Defaults

                    Originally posted by c1ue View Post
                    This isn't about emotion - revenge or otherwise.
                    It isn't necessarily though I'd be lying if I said it wasn't enjoyable to get some revenge in such a situation. Ultimately if you're government is screwing you and everybody else over the only way to keep your head above water much less get out of it is to game the system right back. This doesn't mean you go out and rob random people on the street or some such if you're going to lose your house, but stratgeic default? That IS a great idea.

                    Originally posted by c1ue View Post
                    The problem is it seems many people can't execute on straight decisions.
                    Yes absolutely. I don't think rational actors exist anywhere myself.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Strategic Defaults

                      What happens if the banks released their foreclosure inventory?



                      One effect - no more strategic defaulting. Now you're out on your ear.

                      Another effect - housing prices go down, big time.

                      Another - the bank portfolios stand more fully revealed. Not a pretty picture.

                      Another possible effect? Would 3.5 million foreclosures, in a short period of time, provoke a grass roots political response? Neighbors blocking the sheriff?

                      So-called Strategic Defaults are a phenomenon that exists solely at the pleasure of the mortgage holders. If the economy ever rights itself, they will be seen as a remarkable artifact of a troubled past.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Strategic Defaults

                        Another effect, huge gains in employment as banks scramble to hire people to deal with all these forclosed properties. Anyone here work in a bank forclosure department? How many cases on your desk right now?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Strategic Defaults

                          Originally posted by don View Post

                          Another possible effect? Would 3.5 million foreclosures, in a short period of time, provoke a grass roots political response? Neighbors blocking the sheriff?
                          I doubt it, but maybe in a few isolated areas. Would the people who still pay their mortgage risk going to jail so that their neighbors could live in their house for free?

                          I think people's perception of this issue is very strongly influenced by their situation. On one hand for people that feel they got swindled by their bank or the government or fate, the idea is very appealing.

                          However, the idea of people eating steak dinners (from another article) with the money saved by not paying their mortgage for the last 9 months is frustrating to someone still paying on time, every time.

                          Don't underestimate the resentment felt by people who work hard and don't want to feel like a sucker by paying for what others are getting for free.

                          The truth is probably somewhere in the middle. I don't pity the banks for making risky loans. I also don't applaud strategic defaulters as if they were fighting some kind of holy war on the banks. Let's be honest, they are doing it to help themselves and if there was some kind of gov program that would pay off their mortgage in full and by doing so help them and the bank, they would gladly do it.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Strategic Defaults

                            Originally posted by DSpencer View Post
                            Don't underestimate the resentment felt by people who work hard and don't want to feel like a sucker by paying for what others are getting for free.
                            Hard to do that here on the 'tulip, it's the #1 concern, trumping the banks. (Regardless how strenuously I frame the argument as dictated and controlled by bank malfeasance it comes back to the 'indebted homeowners'.) I agree with your skepticism on neighborhood accord but one never knows when the numbers are that big.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Strategic Defaults

                              the banks don't have the capacity to manage all the real estate inventory. if the defaulting parties continue to occupy the houses, at least they don't rip out the copper pipes to sell for scrap.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X