Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pam Martens 10-Step Program

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pam Martens 10-Step Program

    Ten Ideas to Starve the Wall Street Beast

    By PAM MARTENS

    Dialogue on the economic crisis has focused on symptoms: bailouts, corruption on Wall Street, collapse in housing prices, intractable unemployment, Federal Reserve monetary policy. Most people have been socialized to silence on the topic of the disease itself: debilitating wealth concentration. We hear little on the overwhelming argument that wealth concentration is the root cause of the lingering crisis because within milliseconds of the words escaping into the public arena, screams of “Socialist! Socialist!” proliferate; an army of right wing talk radio buffoons fill the airwaves with dire warnings of the growing communist threat of wealth redistribution; Rick Santelli spazzes out on CNBC; and the Tea Partiers figuratively (or literally) stomp on us.

    The people who scream the loudest aren’t the super rich who control the wealth; they’re part of a labyrinthine network of hired hands who function as high pitch bodyguards for the wealth hoarders. The actual super rich are the folks who appear on the Forbes list of the wealthiest Americans; people like Charles and David Koch, each worth $21.5 billion, who create multi layers of front groups, like Americans for Prosperity, to make it not only socially acceptable to hoard wealth but social nirvana. The Kochs hold secret confabs with their wealthy friends once a year, fingering their worry beads and plotting to keep the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest, lest they become number 6 on the Forbes list of billionaires instead of number 5. This, while 43 million of their fellow Americans live beneath the poverty level; including one in every 5 children.

    David Barber, Associate Professor of American History at the University of Tennessee, is not afraid of the cacophony from the wealth hoarders’ cabal, writing bluntly about the dangers of wealth concentration. In response to an email query last week, Dr. Barber said:
    “American society’s fantastically skewed distribution of wealth stands as one of the main structural fault lines underpinning the Crash. America’s richest one percent of the population own over forty percent of America’s wealth — exclusive of home ownership — in this, the most opulent society history has ever known. On the other hand, the bottom sixty percent of Americans own approximately one percent of all of America’s wealth. Maintaining the Bush tax cuts for the rich only perpetuates a part of the contradiction which brought on the present phase of the world economic crisis.”
    Dr. Barber’s statistics come from a study conducted by Edward N. Wolff for the Levy Economics Institute of Bard College in March 2010. Other findings from that study include the following:

    The richest 1 percent received over one-third of the total gain in marketable wealth over the period from 1983 to 2007. The next 4 percent also received about a third of the total gain and the next 15 percent about a fifth, so that the top quintile collectively accounted for 89 percent of the total growth in wealth, while the bottom 80 percent accounted for 11 percent.

    In 2007, the top 1 percent of households owned 38 percent of all stocks; the top 5 percent owned 69 percent; the top 10 percent held 81 percent.

    Debt was the most evenly distributed component of household wealth, with the bottom 90 percent of households responsible for 73 percent of total indebtedness.

    Wealth concentration in too few hands while the general populace is saddled with too much debt to buy the goods and services produced by the corporations, in whom the wealthiest hold 81 percent of the stock, is a replay of the conditions leading to the crash of 1929 and the ensuing Great Depression. (The Social Security system was borne out of that debacle. This time around, the wealthiest hope to use the funds from the bottom 90 percent flowing into the Social Security trust to prop up stock prices for the benefit of the top 10 percent. Any action today which postpones the inevitable process of more equitable wealth distribution, such as privatizing Social Security or retaining the Bush tax cuts for the wealthiest, will simply hasten the onset of more economic pain which will broaden out to devour the wealth of the upper quintiles through deflation.)

    Writing in his book, “The Worldly Philosophers,” Robert Heilbroner explained the situation leading up to the depression of the 1930s:
    "The national flood of income was indubitably imposing in its bulk, but when one followed its course into its millions of terminal rivulets, it was apparent that the nation as a whole benefited very unevenly from its flow. Some 24,000 families at the apex of the social pyramid received a stream of income three times as large as 6 million families squashed at the bottom -- the average income of the fortunate families was 630 times the average income of the families at the base…And then there was the fact that the average American had used his prosperity in a suicidal way; he had mortgaged himself up to his neck, had extended his resources dangerously under the temptation of installment buying, and then had ensured his fate by eagerly buying fantastic quantities of stock – some 300 million shares, it is estimated – not outright, but on margin, that is, on borrowed money.”
    In both eras, Wall Street ceased being an allocator of capital to worthy enterprises and became an institutionalized system of rigged wealth transfer. The primary artifices this time around included issuing knowingly false stock research; lining up large institutional clients to buy at predetermined prices (laddering) on the first day of a new issue of stock – this made the price appear to soar and thus sucked in the small investor; threatening to take the stock broker’s commission away (penalty bid) if the broker let the small investor take profits in the newly issued stock – the practice was known as flipping and was reserved for the big boys. When the tech mania went bust and the rigged game was revealed, the small investor left in droves. Wall Street, with the Fed’s able assistance, fueled the next bubble – housing – and crafted complex derivatives to turn this market into a cash cow for Wall Street and foreclosures for Main Street.

    The January 21, 2010 Supreme Court decision to allow corporations to have staggering financial influence in our elections (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission) and the November 2, 2010 results of the midterm election should send a bone chilling message. Help is not on the way. The end game of this massive wealth concentration is long-term deflation, economic misery and multiple generations who will look back on us as the hapless society who couldn’t tame the Wall Street greed machine for want of a plan.

    Thinking Americans can no longer wait for politicians to save us. When a dedicated public servant like Senator Russ Feingold from Wisconsin is unceremoniously tossed out and a billionaire-financed Senator like Rand Paul from Kentucky is sworn in on a so-called populist mandate, the baton for economic salvation falls to the individual. I offer below ten ideas to get started on the first course of starving the Wall Street beast. And, just to be clear to those perched on the edge of their seats preparing to scream “Socialist!,” I’m not suggesting “redistributing” wealth; I’m suggesting putting the wealth back into the hands from which it was taken in a rigged wealth transfer scheme.

    (1) Shorten Your Home Mortgage: Former Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis summed it up: "We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." The Wall Street beast is thriving on interest on our debt and using it to hire lobbyists and fund politicians who will work for their interests, not ours.

    According to March 31, 2009 data from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, four Wall Street behemoths control 35 percent of all the insured bank deposits in the U.S. and 46 percent of the assets (although the quality of those “assets” is very much a subject of debate). Those firms are: Bank of America Corporation, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo & Co. and Citigroup, Inc. That leaves the other 8,242 FDIC insured banking institutions to share the balance. The total domestic deposits were $7.5 trillion with total assets of $13.5 trillion as of March 2009. That is far too much wealth concentration in too few hands as we’ve sadly learned from having to bail out those four institutions.

    Seek your accountant and/or financial advisor’s advice about converting your 30 year mortgage to a 15 year to move wealth from the bank’s shareholders pockets to yours. Rates have never been more favorable for such a move. Typically, over the life of the loan, you will save tens of thousands of dollars of interest. You can look at the savings for your specific situation by clicking on the mortgage calculator at www.bankrate.com. (I’m not endorsing any of the bank loans offered at this site since I haven’t done any research in that area; I’m just suggesting the use of the mortgage calculator.)

    Talk to your children before they buy a home about the interest differential between a 30-year and 15-year mortgage over the life of the loan. Show them how to use the mortgage calculator.

    (2) Think Local: Consider moving money as it becomes liquid out of the big Wall Street banks that have an iron grip on your Congress and moving it into FDIC insured certificates of deposit at your community bank (being careful not to exceed the insurance limits). A good rule of thumb is to ladder maturities to coincide with when you will need the money. Again, you should consult with your accountant and/or financial advisor. This will also help provide loan funds to local businesses and residential housing in your area.

    (3) Start a Business: Don’t worry about the possible arrival of the pink slip; be proactive. Start a business on the side. Do well by doing good: what product or service can you provide that a struggling consumer wants and can afford. (Ideas might include: debt counseling, low cost child care, foreclosure counseling, a pick-your-own fruit and vegetable business if you own farm land, consignment shop, home staging services to help with quicker resales.)

    (4) Invest Wisely: Get smart with your 401(k). Investing in the S&P 500 is simply feeding the beast; the beast that’s using your cheap capital to hire lobbyists, create PACs and separate you from representative government. Some 401(k) plans allow you to roll over 50 percent or more to your own IRA after reaching a certain age. Call your benefits office and find out what your options are. Speak to your accountant and/or financial advisor before making any move. You may also want to consider opening an IRA at a community bank and buying insured CDs as an alternative to putting more funds in the 401(k).

    (5) Check Out Credit Union Membership: Do you have a family member that belongs to a Credit Union? Chances are they can get you an account there. If you need to use a credit card, try to get one through the credit union at a reasonable rate and then cut up any high-rate card. It’s an outrage that some of the banks that required a citizen bailout are getting their money from the Federal Reserve at almost no cost while charging struggling citizens 20 percent interest.

    (6) Don’t Use Credit Cards from Corporations That Abuse You: All of the following have one thing in common: Home Depot, Exxon Mobil, Shell, Macy’s, Sears, Zales. They all extend credit to their customers on a Citigroup credit card. Forty million customers are helping to prop up Citigroup and its anti-consumer, anti-citizen practices by using these cards. Citigroup makes its workers sign away their rights to go to court (see number 8 below) and has serially abused investors through corrupt practices.

    (7) Brand Attacks: Chances are high that your local storeowners don’t have a PAC and lobbyists on K Street working against your interests? Reward them with your business and starve the S&P 500 firms until they get the message: if you want me to honor your brand, honor my right to representative government.

    (8) Return the Courts to Workers: Many of the largest corporations force workers to sign away their rights to the Nation’s courts as a condition of employment. It’s called mandatory arbitration and it’s an unfair process that is rigged to favor the corporation. If you interview for a new job, ask if the company has such a policy and walk away if they do.

    (9) Complain: Don’t let shady practices go undetected. Write a detailed report and file it with the appropriate body: local district attorney, state attorney general’s office, consumer protection groups; and write a letter to the editor to the local paper. This helps good businesses prosper and starves dirty businesses of customers.

    (10) Just Say No: To frontal nudity photographs/skin radiation/genitalia groping; all just to board a plane. Don’t fly. You will be standing up for civil rights and starving Wall Street. Body scanner companies trade on Wall Street and the banksters are hoping domestic surveillance is their new cash cow.

    Pam Martens worked on Wall Street for 21 years; she has no security position, long or short, in any company mentioned in this article. She writes on public interest issues from New Hampshire. She can be reached at pamk741@aol.com

    http://www.counterpunch.org/martens11232010.html

  • #2
    Re: Pam Martens 10-Step Program

    Yawn. This whole left vs. right thing is getting old. Who pays Pam Marten's bill? Mr. Soros or one of his multi-layered front groups? If you read between the lines, she is complaining about the same things Santelli's rant and the first Tea Party did: some people get to create money and rig the system and others don't.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Pam Martens 10-Step Program

      I think of it more as the Financial Wing of Say-No to Plastic Bags and Save the Planet.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Pam Martens 10-Step Program

        Looks like Rosa Luxembourg was right: "Either Socialism or Barbarism."

        "
        Friedrich Engels once said: “Bourgeois society stands at the crossroads, either transition to socialism or regression into barbarism.” What does “regression into barbarism” mean to our lofty European civilization? Until now, we have all probably read and repeated these words thoughtlessly, without suspecting their fearsome seriousness. A look around us at this moment shows what the regression of bourgeois society into barbarism means. This world war is a regression into barbarism. The triumph of imperialism leads to the annihilation of civilization. At first, this happens sporadically for the duration of a modern war, but then when the period of unlimited wars begins it progresses toward its inevitable consequences. Today, we face the choice exactly as Friedrich Engels foresaw it a generation ago: either the triumph of imperialism and the collapse of all civilization as in ancient Rome, depopulation, desolation, degeneration – a great cemetery. Or the victory of socialism, that means the conscious active struggle of the international proletariat against imperialism and its method of war. This is a dilemma of world history, an either/or; the scales are wavering before the decision of the class-conscious proletariat. The future of civilization and humanity depends on whether or not the proletariat resolves manfully to throw its revolutionary broadsword into the scales. In this war imperialism has won. Its bloody sword of genocide has brutally tilted the scale toward the abyss of misery. The only compensation for all the misery and all the shame would be if we learn from the war how the proletariat can seize mastery of its own destiny and escape the role of the lackey to the ruling classes....
        The world war today is demonstrably not only murder on a grand scale; it is also suicide of the working classes of Europe. The soldiers of socialism, the proletarians of England, France, Germany, Russia, and Belgium have for months been killing one another at the behest of capital. They are driving the cold steel of murder into each other’s hearts. Locked in the embrace of death, they tumble into a common grave...
        The madness will cease and the bloody demons of hell will vanish only when workers in Germany and France, England and Russia finally awake from their stupor, extend to each other a brotherly hand, and drown out the bestial chorus of imperialist war-mongers and the shrill cry of capitalist hyenas with labor’s old and mighty battle cry: Proletarians of all lands, unite!"

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Pam Martens 10-Step Program

          History moves forward. Historical Materialism is so widely accepted it's not even discussed. Like evolution in science, it's over, done with, move on. Dialectical Historical Materialism is demonstrated periodically- think of the Berlin Wall coming down, Finance Capitalism arriving at today's debacle- but isn't discussed in polite company. Rather than 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 at a certain point becomes A, like boiling water, instead we have 1 is 1 is 1 is 1 and always has been and always will be. It's in the nature of whomever has the upper hand to say and believe it. Something will come after Finance Monopoly Capitalism. What will it be is the question. Or will there be an historical breakdown, with a return to a Dark Age? It what seems like a more enlightened time the best and the brightest threw a generation into the trenches of Flanders and the Eastern Front. If anything, we appear less well prepared than they were.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Pam Martens 10-Step Program

            Originally posted by don View Post
            If anything, we appear less well prepared than they were.
            Yeah -- reading history is scary.

            It seems like this increasingly intense, spiralling tornado of good and evil.
            On the one hand, we have the hundreds of notional trillions of dubious debt derivatives, the tens or hundreds of millions of human lives sacrificed in senseless conflicts (not to mention untold billions of other lives, no doubt), the billions living (or dying) in poverty, hunger and tyranny, the thousands of years of Big Lies, dastardly deceits and flagrant false flag events imposed on humanity by their "leaders", and the limits on planet earth's resources.

            On the other hand billions of people now live better than ever before, as the communications, computations, productivity, technology, organisational complexity, and knowledge of humankind accelerate increasingly upward.
            It's difficult to know how this might play out. It is easy to imagine that it might play out really well, or really badly. It is hard to imagine that it will gently level off into a sustainable and healthy civilisation, like an air-plane reaching its cruising altitude.

            Something will come after Finance Monopoly Capitalism. What will it be is the question. Or will there be an historical breakdown, with a return to a Dark Age?
            Interesting questions.
            Most folks are good; a few aren't.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Pam Martens 10-Step Program

              Originally posted by Pam Martens
              (1) Shorten Your Home Mortgage
              This is actually terrible advice. If we believe that there is going to be substantial inflation in the next few years along with a concomitant rise in interest rates, it's best to lock in debt now at its low rates for as long a term as possible. Assuming one did not overpay for one's house, it's best to take a 30 year, fixed-rate mortgage at a little over 4% and wait for high inflation. If a high inflation period arrives as we expect, the holder of the mortgage (presumably either a FIRE economy institution or a member of the FIRE economy) is going to be on the suffering end as the holder of falling fixed rate paper prices. If Bernanke somehow performs a miracle and enables the economy to recover without high inflation, the 30 year mortgage can still be easily paid off early by making additional principal payments every month. An extra $100 or $200 a month will reduce a typical mortgage duration to roughly 15 years. Finally, if we get a nigh impossible deflation spiral, the borrower can just walk away.
              Last edited by Milton Kuo; November 23, 2010, 11:41 PM. Reason: Changed attribution of quote.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Pam Martens 10-Step Program

                If we believe that there is going to be substantial inflation in the next few years along with a concomitant rise in interest rates, it's best to lock in debt now at its low rates for as long a term as possible.
                I'd concur, if you figure that your personal income will rise with that substantial inflation, allowing you to pay back that debt with cheaper (to you!) dollars.

                If your personal income is more likely fixed or risks falling, then the first thing to worry about is your future cash flows. Could you still pay that mortgage, on the same income, if other expenses were higher?
                Most folks are good; a few aren't.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Pam Martens 10-Step Program

                  Originally posted by ThePythonicCow View Post
                  I'd concur, if you figure that your personal income will rise with that substantial inflation, allowing you to pay back that debt with cheaper (to you!) dollars.

                  If your personal income is more likely fixed or risks falling, then the first thing to worry about is your future cash flows. Could you still pay that mortgage, on the same income, if other expenses were higher?
                  Even if personal income stays the same, it's better to take the longer-term mortgage because you still have the option of paying additional principal each year to more quickly pay off the mortgage while also reducing the total interest you pay. If your income is going to fall to the extent that paying the mortgage becomes difficult, then you shouldn't have taken a mortgage in the first place. In this case, the term of the loan doesn't matter.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Pam Martens 10-Step Program

                    Originally posted by Milton Kuo View Post
                    Even if personal income stays the same, ...
                    Technically, what you say makes sense to me.

                    The problem is that I was not sufficiently clear in my prior post.

                    You had spoken of the financial advantages of holding a low interest, long term mortgage during a period of high inflation.

                    When I see people speak thus, I tend to speak up, because it can entice people to take on risk that may not reward them, or even worse might harm them.

                    For one thing, the potential reward from such a mortgage doesn't depend on the general inflation during the payback period. Rather the reward depends on one's individual income rising, making repayment easier. The general inflation during that period actually works against the debtor, increasing the risk they will have a cash flow crisis, due to other expenses rising.

                    For another thing, your suggestions might make sense for a financial Mr. Spock, cold bloodedly calculating the maximum gain.

                    For most of us humans, the less debt, the less risk, and the more focused we are on quick repayment, then the less debt.

                    I personally only take on, or recommend to my friends and family that they take on, long term debt when they have a robust abundance of capacity to repay that debt. The Siren Song of long term low interest mortgages is just what is, right now as I type, endangering the long term financial health of some I know personally.
                    Most folks are good; a few aren't.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Pam Martens 10-Step Program

                      Originally posted by ThePythonicCow View Post
                      Technically, what you say makes sense to me.

                      The problem is that I was not sufficiently clear in my prior post.

                      You had spoken of the financial advantages of holding a low interest, long term mortgage during a period of high inflation.

                      When I see people speak thus, I tend to speak up, because it can entice people to take on risk that may not reward them, or even worse might harm them.

                      For one thing, the potential reward from such a mortgage doesn't depend on the general inflation during the payback period. Rather the reward depends on one's individual income rising, making repayment easier. The general inflation during that period actually works against the debtor, increasing the risk they will have a cash flow crisis, due to other expenses rising.

                      For another thing, your suggestions might make sense for a financial Mr. Spock, cold bloodedly calculating the maximum gain.

                      For most of us humans, the less debt, the less risk, and the more focused we are on quick repayment, then the less debt.
                      My original posting was commentary on Marten's article, which assumes that someone already has a mortgage. I was not in any way suggesting that people go out and take on a mortgage if they didn't already have one. You are, of course, correct on the factors one must consider when taking on debt.

                      Returning to the original article, however, if we assume that someone already has a mortgage and this person believes he'll be able to pay off the mortgage without difficulty (the person has a combination of a reliable source of income, assets, and a low debt-to-income ratio), I stand by my statement that it's best to take the longest term fixed-rate mortgage possible versus Marten's suggestion of refinancing into a shorter-term mortgage, which I see as utter folly.

                      One can just as easily achieve Marten's goal of lessening interest payments by making additional principal payments with each monthy mortgage payment. This allows one to more quickly pay off the mortgage in full (and pay less total interest) while leaving the option of keeping a lower, fully-amortizing monthly payment available if the borrower's cashflow needs somehow change.

                      The Siren Song of long term low interest mortgages is just what is, right now as I type, endangering the long term financial health of some I know personally.
                      I like your analogy comparing low mortgage rates to siren songs very much. It is exactly Bernanke's goal to use these extremely low mortgage rates and false claims of housing affordability to lure unsuspecting borrowers into overpaying for houses, which may save the TBTF banks. To totally twist mythology, I guess you could say that the banks are Atlas and they're looking for a Heracles to whom they can shunt their burden; Bernanke's low interest rates are the siren song that lures Heracles to Atlas.
                      Last edited by Milton Kuo; November 24, 2010, 04:04 AM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Pam Martens 10-Step Program

                        Originally posted by Milton Kuo View Post
                        My original posting was commentary on Marten's article, ...
                        Ah - ok. Yes you are correct in surmising that I was not properly placing your original posting in the context you (clearly) intended it to be taken in.

                        Originally posted by Milton Kuo View Post
                        Returning to the original article, however, if we assume that someone already has a mortgage and this person believes he'll be able to pay off the mortgage without difficulty (the person has a combination of a reliable source of income, assets, and a low debt-to-income ratio), I stand by my statement that it's best to take the longest term fixed-rate mortgage possible versus Marten's suggestion of refinancing into a shorter-term mortgage, which I see as utter folly.
                        Well, I'll have to agree with that, as I've done just that myself, when in that circumstance.
                        Most folks are good; a few aren't.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Pam Martens 10-Step Program

                          Does anyone else think Mrs. Martens rant is just the natural cycle of every generation? Down with the man so that a new man might rise up. Complacency is human nature so any firm thats been sitting on top has become fat and lazy. Overthrowing them so that a local credit union may rise does not seem to solve the rear problem as I see it: concentrated wealth captures the gov't to make itself entrenched power.

                          Personally, I don't give a rats @ss about wealth creation (well, the jealous and childish side of me does) if it was earned and not abused.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Pam Martens 10-Step Program

                            Originally posted by snakela View Post
                            Personally, I don't give a rats @ss about wealth creation (well, the jealous and childish side of me does) if it was earned and not abused.
                            We are living, however, in an era of great abuse.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X