Screwflation, like its first cousin stagflation, is an expression of a period of slow and uneven economic growth, but, its potential inflationary consequences have an outsized impact on a specific group. The emergence of screwflation hurts just the group that you want to protect — namely, the middle class, a segment of the population that has already spent a decade experiencing an erosion in disposable income and a painful period (at least over the past several years) of lower stock and home prices. Importantly, quantitative easing is designed to lower real interest rates and, at the same time, raise inflation. A lower interest rate policy hurts the savings classes — both the middle class and the elderly. And inflation in the costs of food, energy and everything else consumed (without a concomitant increase in salaries) will screw the average American who doesn’t benefit from QE 2.
http://wallstreetpit.com/48654-doug-...s-screwflation
The problem, however, is that for the lowest 20% of Americans, as per the BLS, food and energy purchases represent over 50% of their after-tax income (a number which drops to 10% for the wealthiest twenty percentile). In other words ... rampant liquidity end[s] up [doubling] food and energy prices (something that is a distinct possibility currently)
(See graph)
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/how...-hungry-winter
http://wallstreetpit.com/48654-doug-...s-screwflation
The problem, however, is that for the lowest 20% of Americans, as per the BLS, food and energy purchases represent over 50% of their after-tax income (a number which drops to 10% for the wealthiest twenty percentile). In other words ... rampant liquidity end[s] up [doubling] food and energy prices (something that is a distinct possibility currently)
(See graph)
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/how...-hungry-winter

Comment