Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trade of the Decade: The Power Elite's Grand Strategy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Trade of the Decade: The Power Elite's Grand Strategy

    Charles Hugh Smith "Of Two Minds" blog:

    http://www.oftwominds.com/blogoct10/...tegy10-10.html

    Here's an excerpt:

    Here is the key point I wish to emphasize: we will not "get" inflation or deflation by chance or mechanistic functions, but by a series of policy choices which will be made to benefit the Financial Power Elites and their functionaries in the Central State.
    As I noted in Hyperinflation Is a Political Process (October 21, 2010), any policy which is driving inflation can be reversed politically at any time. Thus there is nothing inevitable in the current system except the following:
    Demographics and the intrinsic limits of exponentially rising debt and consumption dictate that the status quo will implode at some point in the near future. Historical cycles suggest the point of implosion will occur around 2021-2022, but nothing is written in stone.
    Indeed, were the status quo to transform into a financial and resource-consumption model that was truly sustainable, then the implosion could be avoided altogether. But the concentrations of wealth and political power are so profound that such a transformation seems unlikely, unless the Power Elites concluded such a radical transformation was in their best interests.
    So rather than look at inflation-deflation as mechanical models, I ask: which one would benefit those with the wealth and power? If we answer that, then we can predict which will occur, regardless of what various models predict.
    ... and this:

    All the above leads me to this Grand Strategy for the Financial Power Elites. Most of us have a difficult time putting ourselves in the shoes of those tasked with maintaining the private purchasing power of $500 million, or $5 billion, and the inability to think on this scale leads to obsessive focus on financial minutae.
    If I had $5 billion, and the political power that goes with spending a tiny sliver of that on political donations and lobbying, then here's what I would do, as an entirely "obvious" Grand Strategy:
    1. I would slowly liquidate my common-stock equity and long-bond positions, and maintain my precious-metals positions (preferably ownership of the mines than the bullion) and my preferred stock in global corporations.
    Insiders selling 1,169 to 1 (zero hedge)
    2. I would engineer a global recession that implodes all the asset bubbles around the world--Chinese real estate, commodities, emerging market equities, etc., as demand collapsed and supply was suddenly revealed as overly abundant. (Please see my oil "head-fake" entries for how this works: Oil: One Last Head-Fake? (May 9, 2008)
    This would create a mad dash for dollars and other cash to pay down debt taken on in the "easy money"/ZIRP era (i.e. 2008-2010), and lead to wholesale dumping of all assets which still have value. The higher the value (i.e. gold) the quicker they will be unloaded for cash: for instance, oil and energy-based equities.
    3. I would sit on my hoard of cash while the selling created a positive feedback loop and prices plummeted in a downward panic spiral.
    4. As net worth vanished in the tens of trillions of dollars/yen/yuan/euros, interest rates would rise dramatically as those desperate for funds compete for dwindling free cash. Revenues of oil exporters and other exporters crash, drying up a once-reliable source of cash.
    5. When premium real estate properties and equities are selling for 10%-20% of their pre-crash valuations, I will begin buying. I won't buy long-term bonds until the yields skyrocket; then I will jump in with all four feet.
    6. As the long-term shortage of commodities eventually re-asserts itself, then I (and my other Financial Power Elites cohort) will own most of what the world needs to function, including the Central State tax revenues which will increasingly be directed to making interest payments.
    7. I will be a strong supporter of food stamps and other low-cost rebellion-reduction programs, and "soft" and "hard" power to enforce my ownership of assets which I purchased.
    8. As interest rates rise, the U.S. dollar will strengthen, further increasing my purchasing power.
    9. I will oppose inflationary policies as needless reductions in my purchasing power. I don't owe debt, I own debt as an asset.
    Bottom line: expect a crash in commodity prices and other asset bubbles, a much stronger dollar and rapidly rising interest rates. I am playing it as it lays, and this is precisely what I expect to unfold between 2010 and 2014.



    Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

  • #2
    Re: Trade of the Decade: The Power Elite's Grand Strategy

    Isn't this pure speculation? What evidence is there that there will be another crash leading to dollar repatriation?

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Trade of the Decade: The Power Elite's Grand Strategy

      Originally posted by Chris View Post
      Isn't this pure speculation? What evidence is there that there will be another crash leading to dollar repatriation?
      It's Smith's speculation, based upon what I thought was pretty interesting reasoning, i.e., look at what would best profit the Financial Elites, and how would they arrange things for greatest profit to themselves. Whether or not it will play out this way is entirely speculation. No one can even predict their next breath with 100% assurance.

      Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Trade of the Decade: The Power Elite's Grand Strategy

        We also discussed this article Trade of the Decade: The Power Elite's Grand Strategy of Charles Hugh Smith on an earlier thread, starting at Post #20 of EJ's thread: China Crash 2011 – Part II: Do the currency wars end with a bang or a whimper? .

        Not that I mind further discussion -- I like Smith's analysis.
        Most folks are good; a few aren't.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Trade of the Decade: The Power Elite's Grand Strategy

          Reading the minds of the ruling elite is a dodgy business at best, not that Smith's article doesn't provide traction for some lively input here at the 'tulip. In WW1 most of the antagonists were related. Few died in the trenches. What was unforeseen, let loose by the dogs of war, was that most were out of a job after the Armistice. Was Krupp? The Rothschilds? Following WW2, German bankers and industrialists had to kowtow to US interests but were hardly dispossessed. (Some were compensated) First World, Total War being an extreme case, seems to reveal ... not so much....

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Trade of the Decade: The Power Elite's Grand Strategy

            CHS is spouting the same NWO, Bilderberg, Shadow Elite, whatever silliness which a number of others had also espoused.

            The idea of a 'strong dollar' in the next 5 years seems ridiculous.

            A 'strong dollar' doesn't help federal, state, or personal indebtedness.

            A 'strong dollar' isn't going to generate the jobs necessary to take 20M to 30M Americans out of their financial purgatory.

            A 'strong dollar' isn't going to correct the ongoing trade imbalances (see above).

            CHS is a fine ranter, but his economic theories leave much (all) to be desired.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Trade of the Decade: The Power Elite's Grand Strategy

              Originally posted by c1ue View Post
              CHS is spouting the same NWO, Bilderberg, Shadow Elite, whatever silliness which a number of others had also espoused.

              The idea of a 'strong dollar' in the next 5 years seems ridiculous.

              A 'strong dollar' doesn't help federal, state, or personal indebtedness.

              A 'strong dollar' isn't going to generate the jobs necessary to take 20M to 30M Americans out of their financial purgatory.

              A 'strong dollar' isn't going to correct the ongoing trade imbalances (see above).

              CHS is a fine ranter, but his economic theories leave much (all) to be desired.
              Is it possible to have a "strong dollar" whether you want it or not? After all, Japan certainly isn't interested in a strong yen, yet it keeps getting stronger.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Trade of the Decade: The Power Elite's Grand Strategy

                Originally posted by c1ue View Post
                The idea of a 'strong dollar' in the next 5 years seems ridiculous.

                A 'strong dollar' doesn't help ...

                A 'strong dollar' isn't going to generate ...

                A 'strong dollar' isn't going to correct ...
                I agree that a strong dollar might well not help, generate or correct those things.

                That does not make its possibility ridiculous.

                Sometimes our economic, political and military destiny is not determined by what would be most beneficial to the ordinary person.

                Originally posted by c1ue View Post
                CHS is spouting the same NWO, Bilderberg, Shadow Elite, whatever silliness which a number of others had also espoused.
                You are engaging in name calling, devoid of substance. This distracts (intentionally?) from productive engagement with Smith's remarks.
                Most folks are good; a few aren't.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Trade of the Decade: The Power Elite's Grand Strategy

                  Without huge tax-hikes in the U.S. to curb consumption, a stronger dollar would just lead to more consumption. And that would lead to more deficits in trade and bankruptcy on steroids.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Trade of the Decade: The Power Elite's Grand Strategy

                    Originally posted by shiny! View Post
                    Charles Hugh Smith "Of Two Minds" blog:

                    http://www.oftwominds.com/blogoct10/...tegy10-10.html
                    As I noted somewhere on the thread of EJ's I linked above, the basic difference (in my view) between Smith's view and EJ's view is thus:
                    EJ is figuring (hoping at least) that the major power centers in the United States will ultimately operate on behalf of the (deeply indebted) United States and its people. Smith is figuring (fearing anyway) that the major power centers in the United States have and will continue to operate predominantly on behalf of its lenders.
                    What's good for the debtor is often not good for the lender.

                    I continue to anticipate that what's happening at present is that vast sums of debt are being accumulated and moved into sovereign debt. First it was individual mortgage and credit card debt and corporate and state and local debt. Then it was securitized and leveraged up by the money center banks into debt held by all the deep pockets (retirement funds, sovereign wealth funds, the major banks, ...) Now that debt is being transferred, directly and by guarantee (of Fannie, Freddie and FDIC) into U.S. Treasury debt. Once that transfer is accomplished, the price of that debt will be driven low (high yields on long term U.S. Treasury bonds) and those most powerful and wealthy will be able to purchase many Trillions of Dollars worth of this debt, cheaply, with the cash and T-Bills they have been hoarding.

                    In addition to Smith's analysis, I am indebted to some other analysts, including Gordon T Long, author of such articles as the three part Sultans of Swap series:
                    Most folks are good; a few aren't.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Trade of the Decade: The Power Elite's Grand Strategy

                      Originally posted by Starving Steve View Post
                      Without huge tax-hikes in the U.S. to curb consumption, a stronger dollar would just lead to more consumption.
                      Ah - but we will have those tax-hikes!

                      And we will have continued weak employment and weak wages. International companies will hire few Americans, and hire them cheap. Then the government will tax what little we Americans earn anyway.

                      You see ... we will have to have those higher taxes, to pay down the immense U.S. debt. Austerity, coming soon to a town near you.

                      The era of extravagant American consumption (except for the wealthiest few percent) is over.
                      Most folks are good; a few aren't.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Trade of the Decade: The Power Elite's Grand Strategy

                        Originally posted by TPC
                        You are engaging in name calling, devoid of substance. This distracts (intentionally?) from productive engagement with Smith's remarks.
                        Any name calling I engage in is as a result of Mr. Smith's equal name calling - as opposed to constructive analysis of possible outcomes.

                        The entire article in question avoids all mention of data or underlying economic principles (or lack thereof).

                        It reaches its conclusions entirely via a finger pointing exercise at the so-called elite.

                        Therefore my reaction via name calling is equally valid.

                        The difference between Mr. Smith and say, Dr. Michael Hudson, is that while both may believe that there is a class of society engaged in destruction of the American middle class - the former ascribes this in magical terms to a collection of conspiracy catch words while the latter describes the specific processes and methods by which events have transpired and will transpire.

                        Similarly EJ and iTulip describe a scenario by which the American economy has unfolded in the past decade plus and back said scenario up with data as well as analysis. There are perpetrators just as Mr. Smith and Dr. Hudson note - if perhaps not the same perpetrators - but like Dr. Hudson and unlike Mr. Smith, said perpetrators' actions are specifically outlined in fact.

                        Not in fiction.

                        Much like others in the iTulip past - all references by which credibility might be ascertained are lumped into the generic NWO/Shadow Elite/Bilderberg type categories, ultimately just euphemisms for "take my word for it".

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Trade of the Decade: The Power Elite's Grand Strategy

                          Originally posted by c1ue View Post
                          Any name calling I engage in is as a result of Mr. Smith's equal name calling - as opposed to constructive analysis of possible outcomes.

                          The entire article in question avoids all mention of data or underlying economic principles (or lack thereof).

                          It reaches its conclusions entirely via a finger pointing exercise at the so-called elite.

                          Therefore my reaction via name calling is equally valid.

                          The difference between Mr. Smith and say, Dr. Michael Hudson, is that while both may believe that there is a class of society engaged in destruction of the American middle class - the former ascribes this in magical terms to a collection of conspiracy catch words while the latter describes the specific processes and methods by which events have transpired and will transpire.

                          Similarly EJ and iTulip describe a scenario by which the American economy has unfolded in the past decade plus and back said scenario up with data as well as analysis. There are perpetrators just as Mr. Smith and Dr. Hudson note - if perhaps not the same perpetrators - but like Dr. Hudson and unlike Mr. Smith, said perpetrators' actions are specifically outlined in fact.

                          Not in fiction.

                          Much like others in the iTulip past - all references by which credibility might be ascertained are lumped into the generic NWO/Shadow Elite/Bilderberg type categories, ultimately just euphemisms for "take my word for it".
                          Wow, you and I have completely different takes on the same article. Nowhere did I see any mention of "NWO/Shadow Elite/Bilderberg'. Did I miss it? It seems to me that calling the few people who own 93% of the net worth of the USA (if this is indeed accurate) "Financial Power Elites" is pretty descriptive, without in any way ascribing them to the shadowy groups you mention.

                          There is nothing shadowy or mysterious about the most financial elite paying huge sums into campaign contributions and lobbying efforts in order to get policies that benefit their interests.

                          There's a good saying, "If you want the right answers, you have to ask the right questions."

                          All I took this article for is Smith trying to identify the most likely trend according to the question he asked:

                          "if you owned 93% of the net worth in the U.S., what would benefit you most?"

                          Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Trade of the Decade: The Power Elite's Grand Strategy

                            i donīt think that trying to imagine what is best for the richest elite is conspiracy theory. They have the means and the will to do the things they consider are best for them. Itīs not important if they meet at Bilderberg or elsewhere.
                            If I was them, I would do as Smith says, or at least I would try. The final consequences of their acts donīt seem to be a matter of consideration, was it for the banksters that generated the financial crisis?....no, it was not.
                            Now, for them, the best is to deflate, which means inflate debts in real terms, buy it from governent on the cheap and get control of whichever assets become available to those with cash.
                            Shall it happen?
                            Nobody can be sure, but, that they shall try, of that yes, I am sure.
                            If Hudson says that a debt jubille is in the best interest of the most, particularly working class, and the economy as a whole, well, I think he is absolutely right. But, as a cash holder (a micro cash holder as that), my best interest is in economic deflation collapse. Thatīs the situation, I think of the most powerful elite. At the moment everyone is running from fiat currencies. Everyone that has cash, I mean. They are buying land, gold, oil, whichever. Are the richest people doing that?, and for how long?
                            Well, inflation means the deposession of creditors....who are the creditors now? Governments, but mostly the owners of Governments, that is banks, private banks, and the richest elites through bonds.
                            Whatīs intheir interest, inflation, a debt jubilee? clearly not.
                            So, maybe Smith is mistaken, but, his theory does not seem absurd or conspirational. Things may go another way, I admit...but, beware and ignore at your own peril.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Trade of the Decade: The Power Elite's Grand Strategy

                              Originally posted by shiny! View Post
                              Wow, you and I have completely different takes on the same article ...
                              Yes - wow. Me too.

                              (Note to self: when tempted to respond to c1ue, first go for a walk, take a nap, have a snack and pet the cat.)
                              Most folks are good; a few aren't.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X