Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jim Sinclair contributor nails it, not like we didn;t already know...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jim Sinclair contributor nails it, not like we didn;t already know...

    The Death of Market Fundamentals

    Posted: Aug 02 2010 By: Jim Sinclair Post Edited: August 2, 2010 at 6:15 pm

    Filed under: General Editorial
    To Own Gold is to Vote with your feet where Government is Concerned.
    –Jim Sinclair “A Pocketbook of Gold”
    Dear CIGAs,

    If the past three years has taught us anything about markets, it is that they will do what they are set up to do. OTC Derivatives, financial Ponzi schemes (Madoff etc) and gyrating Fed policy are but a few of the machinations determined by the new market Fundamentals… the Fundamentals of government policy.

    The political and legislative environment creates new Fundamentals that economic realities were supposed to. As government becomes more self-indebted, and politically captured by special interests, the markets reflect these political realities instead of the economic fundamentals they should.

    None of this is news. It has been going on for years. But it is not as benign as it used to be. At the outset its just favouritism: a (usually no-bid) government contract is awarded and a company share price roars on the back of it. Legislative tweaking portends winners and losers. But then things get out of hand.

    An early signal was found not only in the insanity of the mortgage backed securities markets and their attendant derivatives, but was also evident in the energy industry. Nobody in their right mind believes that fundamentals had the slightest thing to do with crude oil’s move from 2006 to 2008 – but the shrill cry of “Peak Oil” (Hat Tip Media) sure did help. (Where is it now?) Far more likely is that a couple of market participants decided to clear some competition from the market by running it to ridiculous levels, and make a large amount of money along the way… and enlisted the Media’s help. A natural bull market presented a great opportunity to push the market to unnatural levels and then drop it like a stone. Fundamentals had no role. Not even the first Gulf War when the borders of Kuwait and Saudi Arabia fell, produced a similar event in terms of scale, though the market was overrun with fear. Even before the Algos started ripping markets up and down for fun and profit the game was on.

    The West Coast electricity market did a similar thing – by creating unscheduled maintenance that somebody had (personally) “scheduled”. $40 million+ people got their eyes gouged out for months on end, but it sure was fun for someone. A similar situation occurred (several times) in the German power market around the turn of the millenium. An American utility or marketer would simply buy every KwH in sight, along the curve, bar none, in a one or two hour space of time, until people who needed the physical power position to meet actual customer demand were forced to follow them, whereupon the relentless buyer would line up every bid in the market and try and unload everything in one shot. Many times it worked. But the US utility industry blew itself up in fraud, and the main German companies refused to trade with them after a while. Deregulation had happened – but the fall back for the near-monopoly German utilities was to say, “I don’t like you as a credit risk. So I can only trade in very, very small size with you.” The gamers were forced out. They killed their own game in the rush for personal glory.

    The charade of options expiry in the Gold market is similar. Get the market up, knowing that call buyers are the public and liked to go naked, and the put buyers are usually market makers trying to butterfly their position and get short the at-the-money strike in expiry. Just before expiry the market is whipsawed down. The public goes out worthless on the call side and the market makers (volume traders) get expired near or at their long strike (i.e. max. loss) and are forced out. Next time around – spreads are wider. It’s an attractive strategy if you can control the underlying for a few hours at the right time of the month. If you can’t – tough luck.

    Only a fool would trade in such a game. People should roll out weeks before expiry – but the public never does. They hang right on in there every time because the market gets so close to going in the money. (Like the Bbanks aren’t aware of this psychology!). The professionals have a name for these people: They’re called Screen Jockeys… and in case you didn’t know – it’s a term of derision.

    A similar situation now exists in that bastion of public interest – the stock market. Trading is simply impossible. Stop-losses can’t be held as orders because they will be used against anyone with a position. As related in M. Lewis’ latest book, the Chinese Walls that supposedly exist in the multiple platforms that trade a single stock should be properly considered as “Bullshit”. Charts are painted to flush people out. What passes for a market is now just a serious of raids up and down the flagpole to shake the hell out of its minor participants. If you aren’t equipped to play “chase the algos” (entry ticket c. $40 million for the technology and servers), your money will simply be taken. The market has for hundreds of years taken money from weak hands, but now anyone without a first class algo can be considered and proven as weak. Fundamental analysis will not help the small trader. It’s simply pointless to participate. Instead of tree-shaking… now the whole damn forest is being shaken. As explained in the book “A Pocketbook of Gold”, any individual with the slightest amount of margin will be destroyed by the hyper-over-leveraged banks that don’t have to mark to market, never have a margin call, and have a government guaranteed, taxpayer funded bailout. These are the NEW fundamentals. You want to participate on the other side of this, so call “trade”? If you do, you need serious help. Do you want to play with the take-down artists, the chart painters and algo-drive market-bashers? (To Mr Sinclair’s “haters” of the past fortnight please recall his relentlessly iterated warning to abandon all Gold trading and margin at $548 per ounce, and hold the core as insurance only.)

    The result is that retail has had it with the so-called “market”. Outflows are increasing steadily, while liquidity swamps financial institutions unwilling to do anything other than sit on the liquidity. The bail-out looks like a bail-in. Only idiots like the zero-return in a decade (and a lot less if properly numerated against Gold) pension funds are left. The suckers have woken up and are refusing to play. Computer driven markets go from awash with liquidity to zero liquidity and back again in seconds. It’s enough to make a schizophrenic look balanced. Risk is fully on, then fully off, then fully on again several times in a given day, soon to be in a given hour, minute, second, mille and then micro-second. Trade if you have a death wish only. As the public exits, the algos will now attack each other in a macabre pas de deux of death dance.

    Government, of course, is playing its part too in the death of the markets by destroying the value of fundamental analysis. The capitulation of FASB to a government/Fed dictated policy of suspending the assessment of fair value has, as its corollary, the suspension of even the possibility that ‘fair value’ can still, in fact BE determined. Since the government now determines market outcomes, reading Maoist “Wall Posters” is now all one has. (“If one knows the nuances, the walls tell all” was the nod for Deng Xio Peng’s political destruction. This is what we have been reduced to.) As if analysing Greenspan’s FedSpeak wasn’t enough to live through, we now must be scanning the horizon all day for the QE II, instead of analysing a company’s worth and prospects. Resistance may be futile, but participation is now idiocy. Money supply is viciously ramped up and then completely shut-off, at a whim, and with few but opaque methods for observation. When people are buying the stock market only because they envision a Bernanke money-printing induced melt-up, it’s time to leave. That is no reason to be in the marketplace, it is a reason to avoid it.

    Previous market participants are sick of trying to decide the level of deceit in Government statistics. No one can anticipate whimsical “on the hoof” policy (like occupying Iraq), so everyone is fearful of investing. Money is going to the mattress like a Spaniard living under Franco. Germans and other Europeans are rushing into the Swiss Franc in outright fear of what politicians might do next. The level of trust from the investing public has never been lower. Government won’t let Fundamentals play out, just like they refused to take a recession ten years ago. The Fed can trump all fundamentals until, of course, they can’t any longer, and they blow up everyone including themselves (i.e. sovereign default). When proper valuation is suspended for as long as possible and seemingly, hopefully, forever, one would be advised to spend their time building a nuclear resistant financial bunker, preferably lined with Gold. It could give a whole new meaning to the old adage that the “Fundamentals always win in the end”. In the new intonation, the emphasis is on the word “end”. An “end” that seems to be in the process of being succinctly arranged.

    In the search for absent fundamental indicators, “Shadow Stats” became preferred, but that only detracts from confidence. It does nothing to enhance it. Mr. Williams does not sit at the Fed or in Government. Most likely, it will be QE to infinity, because the disastrous outcome of a Treasury market implosion could be even more devastating than perpetuating a depression. QE is a government played trump card that destroys Fundamental analysis by moving the pricing numerator. Desperation is palpable. It’s why the Government is actively destroying any attempt at fundamental analysis. The sustaining of the smoke and mirrors game demands it. If Government continues to spend, they eventually go bust from debt. If they head down the austerity path, you’ll never have enough GDP to SERVICE the debt. They’re cornered. Devaluation de facto or de jure (i.e. default) is the only possible outcome short of waiting for inevitable systemic collapse along with the hyper-inflation which will give you about as much warning as a Tsunami on your visible horizon. As Mr. Sinclair has related, “Gold is financial High Ground, when a Global Tsunami hits.” Prepare accordingly.

    CIGA Pedro

  • #2
    Re: Jim Sinclair contributor nails it, not like we didn;t already know...

    the Fundamentals of government policy.
    Yet another example of getting it half right. FIRE utilizes the government for its own ends. The government has no ends, or fundamentals...except to preserve and expand. It's pretty open as to where.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Jim Sinclair contributor nails it, not like we didn;t already know...

      exactly. I never hear these market ideologues blaming it all on government mentioning that the top bracket of private wealth has increased seven fold while joe six pack has gone nowhere over the past couple of decades.

      Its all so simple to these guys, and they keep telling the rest of us to grow up, all the while hiding behind vulgar ideology leaving no room adult qualities of balance nuance and compromise. They can't handle lack of perfection so they accept a vulgar internally consistent ideology instead.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Jim Sinclair contributor nails it, not like we didn;t already know...

        Originally posted by marvenger View Post
        exactly. I never hear these market ideologues blaming it all on government mentioning that the top bracket of private wealth has increased seven fold while joe six pack has gone nowhere over the past couple of decades.

        Its all so simple to these guys, and they keep telling the rest of us to grow up, all the while hiding behind vulgar ideology leaving no room adult qualities of balance nuance and compromise. They can't handle lack of perfection so they accept a vulgar internally consistent ideology instead.
        And how did the top bracket of private wealth get that massive increase in wealth?

        You are implying there is some sort of injustice in how they obtained that wealth. Did they steal it? Did they violate criminal laws? Then they should be prosecuted for that. If they are not being prosecuted for it, IT IS A FAILURE OF GOVERNMENT.

        If they earned that wealth - and it's quite possible they didn't violate a single law to earn that wealth - then they played by the rules and they just did it better than you.

        Another possibility is that they know how to game the system and how to get the government to give them special exceptions and considerations that their competition isn't getting. Again, this would be a FAILURE OF GOVERNMENT.

        Or of course there is the general leftwing complaint that these people just have too darn much money. I suppose they should have given it away, or not have been so rude as to actually go and earn so much than anyone else.

        I really couldn't care less if there are people who earn massively more than other people do. That's the great thing about living in a highly advanced technological (semi-)free market...smart, ambitious people can leverage up their skills to huge multiples of what less smart, less ambitious people can do. In cave man society, that's not possible - the smartest lives very little better than the dumbest.

        We already have massive government and bookshelves full of regulations and laws. Yet leftwingers think we still need some more. I say the solution is radically LESS government intervention. Let the buyer beware. Let the overextended bank fail and its depositors lose their money. Let businesses compete without the ability to get the government to pass laws protecting them from competitive pressures from other businesses. Protect people's private property rights and otherwise quit with all the moral hazard and bailouts and "consumer protection" and labyrinthine regulation.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Jim Sinclair contributor nails it, not like we didn;t already know...

          Originally posted by Mn_Mark View Post
          If they earned that wealth - and it's quite possible they didn't violate a single law to earn that wealth - then they played by the rules and they just did it better than you.
          It's easy to play by the rules when you write them or better yet change them in the middle of the game.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Jim Sinclair contributor nails it, not like we didn;t already know...

            You keep talking about failure of government which I think is great. There needs to be more talk about how to make it better, and for that to happen you first have to acknowledge it has purpose and isn't this automatic vehicle of evil.

            Also at the end of the day I think gov can never overcome abuses from within and powerful private interests taking control of vital aspects of it -but it can be made better - and as people do not like inequality and society does not function well when it is rampant it is people that need to be eternally vigilant to ensure there is a good measure of justice in society (no market solution available)

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Jim Sinclair contributor nails it, not like we didn;t already know...

              It is the government's job to be the grown ups here. Not the the "evil rich/top bracket" people. Those are like a class of overprivileged kindergartners. They will just keep on taking until a grown up steps in and makes them play nice. Government is the enforcer of the rules. And if government is in cahoots with these "top bracket" types then that is still a failing of government. Accountability is key. Do we blame the kindergartners or do we blame the teacher who should know better? Better yet, do we try and change the behavior of thousands of corporate scoundrels one by one, or do we merely demand that the government, that is supposed to be accountable to the people, actually become so?

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Jim Sinclair contributor nails it, not like we didn;t already know...

                I reckon instead of te peace corps they should have a political economy corps, a kind of grassroots education movement that is volunteer based and focused on power abuse in the economic realm... Money needs to be kept out of it as much as possible, there's no other purpose other than the discussion of ideas and gaining knowledge. How on earth do you get people interested in that?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Jim Sinclair contributor nails it, not like we didn;t already know...

                  Originally posted by don View Post
                  Yet another example of getting it half right. FIRE utilizes the government for its own ends. The government has no ends, or fundamentals...except to preserve and expand. It's pretty open as to where.
                  exactly... try this...

                  Asylum Markets of the post FIRE Economy – Part I: Locked Up

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Jim Sinclair contributor nails it, not like we didn;t already know...

                    The earths "economy" has become complex beyond understanding in the last hundred years or so, exponentially so over the last several decades. There is not a human alive who can claim to understand it. A chaos of complexity.

                    Folks who think they understand always want to point fingers, jump up and down, and hunt down the guilty. They believe this is enough to save us all. This is both a waste of increasingly valuable time as well as dangerous.

                    The world is an economic mess - with all the subsidiary messes that flow from it - because of the silent, piece meal, evolutionary development of complex human systems. It is because it just happened that way, developing in little bits one at a time and imperceptibly, all of us cheering every little bit without noticing the sum of it all. Until the sum of it all one day overwhelmed us. Now of course, it's too late.

                    This is not an American problem, a Democrat or Republican problem, not a Keynes or Friedman or Austrian school problem. Nothing to do with your liberal or conservative ideological slant. It's a human problem. Ranting about the few and scattered individual bits is , as I say, both pointless, dangerous, and a complete waste of time.

                    I was just thinking about this recently, and what could be done about it (from a couple recent blog entries);


                    "Our world has become a chaos of complexity. It became this way slowly but inevitably. It is the human way. Each new thing begets another two, and each two in their turn beget more, starting imperceptibly slow, and rising through the wonder of exponential compounding. Each new day is the current total of all that compounding and exponential advance, IPods and IPads the sharp point of a spear forged from the first fire tens of thousands of generations ago. It is a process that is not just irreversible, but rolling forward ever faster and more dramatically, climbing fast and vertical now up the right side of the graph. We must learn to deal with it as it unravels"

                    "
                    We will recognize this unraveling of the ball of string by the amounts of money workers have in order to pay the money they owe. When the humble worker can no longer make the payments that keep the owe-string alive, or the amount he has to pledge no longer allows further borrowing, the owe-string will collapse into itself accordion like and in pretty quick order. This should be obvious and intuitive. No one on the conga line will have the income from one end to pay the outcome of the other. Can you imagine the mess?"
                    ScreamBucket.com

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Jim Sinclair contributor nails it, not like we didn;t already know...

                      Agreed ... but would anybody have expected the bubbles to be of such magnitude with such short duration? Isn't the "Flash Crash" of May the Rosetta stone event that we should all be thinking about?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Jim Sinclair contributor nails it, not like we didn;t already know...

                        So in essence you are telling me that the US imperialists are doing the the very Americans the same thing that they had been doing to the rest of the world for the last fifty years. To bad that the rest of the world has learned the lesson and has not forgotten.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Jim Sinclair contributor nails it, not like we didn;t already know...

                          No, I don't think I am saying that.

                          It's a human thing in a way, a human thing which found its best expression in the western world after the late middle ages - long before the US or US imperialists. Our concept of progress is wed to a particularly virulent form of capital creation and employment that developed independent of the rest of the world. In it's triumph, this western world view grew in complexity layer by layer and over time, picking up strata and strings with exponential speed as time progressed. It could do no other. This concept of progress and capital has been virtually unchecked, and since it has given us cheeseburgers and plastic lawn mowers, it has been in no ones interest to apply any kind of brake or mitigation. Anyone who tries is a communist, socialist, or terrorist. Sometimes we kill them.

                          Of course, no nation or people have profited by it to the degree the modern American has. America carries the flag and the freight for the ideology. But it's not America alone, and the unintelligible levels of complexity that pile on day after day are universal in nature - they effect us all. Really, no one man or institution is to blame - if ever you could sort out any kind of blame. It's a simple amorphous mess of chaotic complexity out there and that is all there is to it.
                          ScreamBucket.com

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Jim Sinclair contributor nails it, not like we didn;t already know...

                            I take the opposite view of the world: I am not interested in algorithms nor technicals, not painted tapes nor painted charts. I do not trade in mille-seconds, nor do I computer-trade anything.

                            I am Starving Steve, and I trade for the lifetime, to own something forever, and to take all the dividends along the way. I trade on fundamentals.

                            I am the guy that still holds BP. I am not interested in ecologists nor bird habitat. I am not interested in Obama's politics nor in Nancy Pelosi and her Sierra Club bunch from San Francisco.

                            The long-term is peak cheap oil, and we are past the peak. China is the future, and so is India. America is the distant past.
                            America has no future without drilling because there is no alternative to fossil fuels. And nuclear power is at least five years off. End of story. That is all that I need to know.

                            So the future is fossil fuels including natural gas, up-graded heavy oil, hydro-electric dams, and atomic power. Cars will be four-cylinder engines, just like now, but with maybe more diesel and maybe more nat. gas.

                            Funny, this is what I told my job interviewers forty years ago, and I was 100% correct. I stay with my forecast, even now in 2010. My investments are in BP, oil and gas trusts, and Exxon. Whatever the markets do in mille-seconds, flash-crash, Obama, eco-frauds, and painted-charts, I trade for the long-haul.

                            And my gold trade was a looooooooooooser until the past 10 years. Same approach. I loved gold as a kid, and I still love gold now. Gold is a good long-term hold, for those who can stomach the crashes and still think of the long-term.

                            Your own home in clear-title is another good long-term winner, for those who can stomach the pain of the crashes that come every few years. Your home pays you free rent, come what may in the real estate market.

                            So, I look at the mille-second traders and shake my head. What maroooooooooooooons! A zero-sum game is a zero-sum game, no matter what algorithms you use, and no matter how fast you can trade. It really is just that simple.
                            Last edited by Starving Steve; August 09, 2010, 07:51 PM.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Jim Sinclair contributor nails it, not like we didn;t already know...

                              I vote for the fine actions of Hungary in standing up for its citizens against the IMF and powerful interests as a prescient case study to engage with.


                              Hungary's Defiance Of IMF And European Authorities Scares The Guardians Of Austerity In Europe

                              Mark Weisbrot | Aug. 9, 2010, 5:51 PM | 776 | 7
                              • A A A
                              • x
                                Email Article






                                Email Sent!

                                You have successfully shared the post.






                              From The Guardian with permission from the author:
                              The government of Hungary has taken on a lot of powerful interests in the last couple of months, and so far appears to be winning – despite provoking outrage from everybody who's anybody.
                              "The IMF should hold the line," shouted the Financial Times in an editorial the day after Hungary sent the IMF packing in July. "With so many countries in vulnerable positions, it cannot be seen to be a soft touch. Showing a few yellow and red cards is a good way to send a signal to other governments that might be tempted to flirt with indiscipline."
                              This is the great fear among the defenders of European "pro-cyclical" policies – that is, policies that weaken the economy during a recession or when it is barely growing. Hungary's defiance could conceivably spread to other governments currently being squeezed by the IMF and European authorities.
                              First, the Hungarian government decided in early July to levy a new tax on banks and other financial companies, which would raise some $855m this year and next. Foreign banks, which made a fortune during Hungary's bubbly growth years prior to the crash in 2007, screamed and lobbied, but – despite having the IMF in their corner– did not prevail.
                              Then, the government refused to give in to IMF demands for further budget deficit reduction. Hungary has already been through nearly four years of austerity in which the deficit was reduced from 9% to 3.8% of GDP. More importantly, the country's current account deficit – its imbalance with the rest of the world, which was more than 7% of GDP in 2008 – is less than 1% for this year. With unemployment having risen from 7% in 2007 to nearly 12% today, and the economy still barely growing, Hungarians were understandably beginning to wonder when they would see light at the end of this long tunnel. Negotiations with the IMF over conditions for further access to IMF funds broke down on 17 July.
                              Now, the government of Viktor Orban, whose party won a landslide with more than two-thirds of the Hungarian parliament in April, has taken aim at the country's central bank, blaming it for keeping interest rates too high and thereby delaying the recovery. The government cut the salary of the Andras Simor, the governor of the central bank, by 75%. (If only we could have done that to Alan Greenspan or Ben Bernanke, just to make an example out of them for missing the two biggest asset bubbles in world history and thus guaranteeing our worst recession since the Great Depression.) The central bank is holding policy interest rates at 5.25%, one of the highest in Europe (compare this to our own Federal Reserve's policy rate of 0-0.25%, since the end of 2008).
                              All of these decisions by the Orban government have some economic logic to them. The bank tax amounts to about 0.5% of GDP, which is significant for a government that is trying to reduce the deficit; and the banks – whose reckless lending practices, as in the United States and elsewhere, had a lot to do with causing the mess that Hungary faces – are already profitable even as the economy is still stagnating. This is a good place to collect taxes. The pro-cyclical policies demanded by the IMF (budget cuts and tax increases) have kept the economy from recovering; at some point, someone has to say "enough is enough".
                              And the same is true for the central bank's high interest rates: they have been much too high through most of the downturn, between 8 and 11.5% in 2008, while the economy was in decline. Last year, Hungary's GDP fell by 6.3%, while policy rates were still between 6.25 and 9.5%. A crash of this magnitude, with the economy barely growing this year, indicates policy failure.
                              But the government's actions have elicited harsh rebuke from on high. The standard orthodoxy is that central banks must be "independent" of the government – which often means that they look out for the interests of bankers rather than the general public.
                              Credit rating agencies such as Moody's and Standard & Poors – the folks who brought us triple-A rated toxic junk in the form of mortgage-backed securities a couple of years ago – have put Hungary on review for possible downgrade due to its failure to reach agreement with the IMF. As the New York Times reported last week, the fight in Hungary "reflects a larger struggle that is expected to play out over the next year or so as most European politicians… seek to impose fiscal discipline on their increasingly unruly citizens."
                              We can only hope that they get more unruly. The governments of Spain and Greece, for example, have a lot more bargaining power and a lot more alternatives than they have been willing to use.
                              It is ironic that a centre-right government in Hungary has taken the lead here; but if the socialist governments of Spain and Greece were to stand up to the European authorities and the IMF, they could also rally popular support. And then we would see a new playing field in Europe that would allow for a more rapid recovery, and possibly end the current assault on the living standards of the majority.





                              Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/hunga...#ixzz0wA4IcO00

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X