Re: Commander's Weather, iTunes, deflation, Cognitive Surplus, and Unemployment
You should volunteer at a school, a soup kitchen, community organization, or charity and do some 'grunt' level work. If you had, I'm convinced that you would not cast aspersions so easily on something so fundamentally beneficial to our society.
Working 1 on 1 with someone to help others help themselves and simultaneously make the world a better place is one of the true joys of the human condition.
No one should deny themselves that. If you haven't seen it yet, you should try another venue to practice your magic. The results are, well... MAGICAL.
Besides, lobbyists persuade, volunteers serve. I think that is a critical distinction.
We need to create a ton of jobs right? How about instead of "make work" jobs we create jobs where people actually SERVE their local community in a variety of ways. They could accrue retirement credit from their service the same as any federal employee or military member. When they earn enough credits they could start collecting their "retirement". You could have it kick in at say age 65 or so. In this way you could tie in the guaranteed income system that I've talked about earlier with this type of federal retirement credit system.
The trick is, an individual would get a guaranteed income UNTIL they reach retirement age, say 65. THEN they would have to fund themselves. In this way, the system is like the Australian Health Care system. You are FUNDED via public financing until age 65, then you have to pay for yourself. In this way People are INCENTIVEIZED to provide for their own welfare during their working lifetimes BECAUSE they know that there will be no government support available to them after they retire.
It makes NO SENSE to me that we back-load societal costs into the most expensive years of life (elder-years). It makes FAR MORE SENSE to FRONT-LOAD support so that you give the young the best chance to develop into everything that they are capable of (remember they have an incentive to do so). BUT, we have to take care of people who are living under the old system. There has to be a trade-off. How to make that trade-off equitable between older and younger is going to be a challenge BUT, I think that when people are given a chance to make a rational decision about what is in their own best interest, without distortions of reality, they go for it.
Anyway, hope these concepts/ideas prove useful somehow.
Originally posted by c1ue
View Post
Working 1 on 1 with someone to help others help themselves and simultaneously make the world a better place is one of the true joys of the human condition.
No one should deny themselves that. If you haven't seen it yet, you should try another venue to practice your magic. The results are, well... MAGICAL.
Besides, lobbyists persuade, volunteers serve. I think that is a critical distinction.
We need to create a ton of jobs right? How about instead of "make work" jobs we create jobs where people actually SERVE their local community in a variety of ways. They could accrue retirement credit from their service the same as any federal employee or military member. When they earn enough credits they could start collecting their "retirement". You could have it kick in at say age 65 or so. In this way you could tie in the guaranteed income system that I've talked about earlier with this type of federal retirement credit system.
The trick is, an individual would get a guaranteed income UNTIL they reach retirement age, say 65. THEN they would have to fund themselves. In this way, the system is like the Australian Health Care system. You are FUNDED via public financing until age 65, then you have to pay for yourself. In this way People are INCENTIVEIZED to provide for their own welfare during their working lifetimes BECAUSE they know that there will be no government support available to them after they retire.
It makes NO SENSE to me that we back-load societal costs into the most expensive years of life (elder-years). It makes FAR MORE SENSE to FRONT-LOAD support so that you give the young the best chance to develop into everything that they are capable of (remember they have an incentive to do so). BUT, we have to take care of people who are living under the old system. There has to be a trade-off. How to make that trade-off equitable between older and younger is going to be a challenge BUT, I think that when people are given a chance to make a rational decision about what is in their own best interest, without distortions of reality, they go for it.
Anyway, hope these concepts/ideas prove useful somehow.
Comment