Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Joe Bageant

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Joe Bageant

    hits his wall....

    Round Midnight

    By JOE BAGEANT
    Ajijic, Mexico.
    Near midnight and I am making tortillas on an iron skillet over a gas flame. Some three thousand miles to the north, my wife and dog nestle in sleep in the wake of a 34-inch snowstorm, while the dogs of Ajijic are barking at the witching hour and roosters crow all too early for the dawn. While my good Mexican neighbors along Zaragoza Street sleep.

    Yet here I am awake and patting out tortillas, haunted by the empire that I have called home most of my life.

    I like to think that, for the most part, I no longer live up there in the U.S., but southward of its ticking social, political and economic bombs. Because the US debt bomb has not yet gone off, Social Security still exists, and the occasional royalty check or book advance still comes in, allowing me to remain here. And so long as America's perverse commodities economy keeps stumbling along and making lifelike noises, so long as the American people accept permanent debt subjugation -- I can drink, think and burn tortillas. Believe me, I take no smugness in this irony.

    There is a terrible science fiction-like awe in the autonomous American economic monolith, in the way that it provides for us, feeds on us and keeps us as its both its lavish pets and slaves. The commodity economy long ago enslaved Americans and other "developed" capitalist societies. But Americans in particular. The most profound slavery must be that in which the slaves can conceive of no other possible or better world than their bondage. Inescapable, global, all permeating, the commodities economy rules so thoroughly most cannot imagine any other possible kind of economy.



    You can argue that people have always screwed other people for a buck, or a drachma or a shekel. You will win with that argument every time. However, the real issue is about how many people got screwed and how hard by how few. Under 250 years of capitalism, the rising take from the ongoing screw job has grown astronomical. Enough to buy every political tub-thumper in Washington and a Supreme Court. Enough that if the elite cartels on Wall Street rip 300 million Americans for trillions, leaving them squinting at the fine print on their eviction notices, they cannot do jack about it. Except pay the next ransom demand for their credit . On their credit cards. Then sign their children into future debt slavery.



    We are all Mexicans now

    Thanks to the autonomous commodities economy, Mexico literally cannot keep itself in tortillas. No longer food self-sufficient, Mexico, where corn was first bred and developed into a staple, buys corn on the world market. The price of tortillas in the tiendas along my street is up 40% and climbing at ten times the rate of Mexico's minimum wage.

    Mexico was food self-sufficient in 1982. Minimum daily wage then was the equivalent of 8.2 kilos of eggs, or 23 liters of milk, or 33 kilos of tortillas. Eighty-five percent of the people had access to government medical care and the country was fifth worldwide in GNP growth. Now, thanks to international financial pirates, Mexico cannot even keep itself in tortillas.

    This has happened repeatedly to Mexico, each time due to a different pirate gang, the French, the English, the Germans. But most often, it is the Americans and their institutions and policies, the IMF, GATT and NAFTA. Mexico is continually robbed from within and without. Within lives the tapeworm of government-business corruption feeding on money passing through the nation's economic bowel. From without come the assaults of American and global corporate financialism.

    Loathe as Americans are to believe it, the Mexican people and the American people are in the same situation of being mugged. However, they are robbed at a different rate and from different positions in the global pecking order. We rob the Mexicans and global capitalism robs us. Fortunately we can still afford to buy our national food staple from Dominoes. Which makes us a superior people.


    Humping the Big Lie

    Decades ago, the spectacle of commodity capitalism, the sheer variety of possible stuff to own, ways to be, possible appearances of being, came to constitute a commodity in itself -- enchantment as a product, product as enchantment. Materialistic enchantment as commodity was so powerful in scale and scope, and so thorough in mind saturation that it came to colonize our consciousness in what Guy Debord aptly deemed "the society of the spectacle."

    No ordinary person could ever have withstood such a colonization of human consciousness as the American people have seen. Consciousness being simply awareness, there was no surviving the onslaught. The tsunami of false possibilities and pseudo choices constituted entire constellations in the psyche, of goods, and images of goods large and small: hair dryers, iPods, anti-bacterial wipes, cable television, ammunition, plastic siding, gourmet foods, this HP notebook computer in my lap, the Prius and the Porsche, even words such as Google, Microsoft, China Mobile, Vodafone, Marlboro… They all have psychological and social meaning in our commoditized consciousness, that battlefield where each commodity vies for preeminence with every other commodity in the shifting exposition of stuff we are permitted to labor to pay for.

    It can now be honestly stated that mere goods and services express the citizenry and the American culture in its entirety. Citizenship in a consumer society is consumership. Consumer culture consumes all rival cultures, replacing them with "pop culture," which is simply deeming the marketplace as culture. Hip Hop is a good example. So is the modern cinema, and all of the music and book publishing industry. Corporate industry and its products are not culture, despite all the new definitions of culture bourgeois academia and the marketplace come up with on behalf of the corporations that fund both of them.



    Mr. Popularity and the marmot

    The rest of the country is oblivious, lost in the anxious clamor for an economic "recovery." The voice of the state defines recovery for them as a return to former levels of the unsustainable superheated capitalism, and increased indebtedness of the populace. “Oh when of when will the bankers ‘loosen the credit markets so we can again buy things?’ As if their debt slavery were a great gift! The banksters simply do not issue more credit to people they know are dead broke--because they broke 'em, They will continue to make more money by letting the people wail, and taking the people’s money directly from the state as bailouts. Stretched out over the coming years, we will see moiré if them. It should give us chills.

    Obama is himself a commodity, the most telegenic political commodity since Kennedy. One that suits American style capitalism best this particular historical political moment. He is a useful illusion, the same as George W. Bush was a useful illusion. What is the difference between George Bush managing the country through media performances and Obama doing the same? Both are telegenic, which is everything today, but in different ways. One was stupid but radiated virility and manly appearance; the other is attractive for his intelligence and so smart he's stupid. Both lives are absorbed in "appearing to be" in the Great American Hologram of appearances. We are a nation following the appearance of national leadership.

    Americans are hope fiends. We always see hope somewhere down every road, chiefly because honestly looking at the present situation would destroy just about everything we hold as reality. Personally, as I often state and catch readership hell for, I do not like hope. When Obama ran it up the flagpole for us to salute, and so many saluted, my blood chilled.
    Made me feel that we were all in deeper shit than I had supposed (Nevertheless, I reluctantly voted for Obama. At the time it seemed It was either Obama, or continuing war, debt, and diminishing civil liberties. Ha!) Hope is magic thinking, believing that somehow, some larger unknown force is in motion to set things right.

    The world is what it is, and its injustices are set right by peoples and nations morally intact enough to challenge its malevolent forces.
    Hope is political pabulum for an infantilized nation.

    A shot at economic justice (gets you shot at)


    In all honesty, I am sick of thinking about it, tired of burning up unrecoverable hours at the end of my 63-year old candle writing about it.

    Distance and solitude seem the only refuge. Which is why I am "aging Mexican," and almost monastically absorbed in the small daily rituals of sustenance these days. I do not kid myself that it is permanent or a real solution to the unbearable ugliness of the American condition.

    But at the moment, four AM, a cricket chirps in the orange tree by my window, and my tortillas are perfectly lovely.

    http://www.joebageant.com/

  • #2
    Re: Joe Bageant

    Makes me recall graffiti I saw 30+ years ago on my college campus.
    Someone spray painted it large on a wall, and it was there for years

    "Be silent. Consume. Die."

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Joe Bageant

      The one I remember:

      Written on a bathroom wall.

      Help support Mayor Daly's all out fight on freedom.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Joe Bageant

        Originally posted by don View Post
        This has happened repeatedly to Mexico, each time due to a different pirate gang, the French, the English, the Germans.
        What about the Spanish? The original pirate gang that murdered millions of Mexicans.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Joe Bageant

          Berkeley, California, circa 1969. Black Panther Huey Newton was in prison. Seen on a plywood wall around a campus construction site:

          "Free Huey, Louie, and Dewey."

          Politics, consumption and mass indoctrination. How sweet it was and is.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Joe Bageant

            I wonder why he abandoned his Garifuna people in Belize. Maybe to hang out with his buddy Fred Reed in the Guadalajara region...

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Joe Bageant

              Two more great ones from him - Anderson Cooper and Class Solidarity
              Class solidarity was such a good idea. It really was. Obviously, most of the people who need solidarity are in the world's laboring classes. After all, the rich have more than enough solidarity already, as was recently demonstrated by their successful execution of the greatest global financial heist in history. Oh sure, we'll see some state sponsored mock show trials of a few of them -- they always throw a few of their own out of the sleigh to the wolves during their escapes. The big heist was big news. Working Americans will be applying Preparation H to their keisters for a long time to come.

              But the ultimate accomplishment of the already rich, the newly rich and the corporate rich, has been their global solidarity on the corporate/financial front. It's been a long run up to globalism, but the rich have great patience. As an American, all my life I've heard their chief mouthpiece, the president of the United States, beginning with Eisenhower, right on up through Kennedy, Reagan, Ford, Carter and Bush, and now Obama, sing the same song. Which goes moreover like this:
              "Trade is the road to peace. Commerce and business know no national boundaries. They link nations together on productivity, creating jobs and peace across the world."
              It sounded good at the time. Who would have thought that the people enjoying all this harmony and peace brought about through globalization would be enjoying it in a one big happy planetary work gulag? And if they are not doing so at the moment, they will be as soon global capitalism, under the watchful solidarity of the rich, bears full fruit.

              Thanks to globalization, the American, Australian and European working classes are on their way to extinction, in terms of their traditional rights, and quality of life. Just like the workers being poisoned to death by circuit board toxins in Guiyu, China, their fates will be determined by global capital, either by default or by bitter struggle against it. We are not seeing much of the latter and are not likely to, until it is too late, which it may already be. After all, you cannot put up much of a struggle against global capital when you worship it a creed and are addicted to commodities too.

              Oh yeah, I forgot. We're gonna "develop" and "stimulus" our way out of what is happening now -- which is that we are fast becoming a slave labor workhouse planet. Now let me see here -- hmmm -- who is in charge of development? Oh yeah, the global financiers.

              There is no way the world's working people can win in the long run, which is getting pretty damned short, or even survive, except by joining the worker struggles, of China, Asia and Africa and India. The idea that American workers are the same as the Asian and Latin American and African working people goes down hard in American gullets. (I'm no expert, but it looks to me like the Euros and the Aussies and the Canadians are snotty that way too. In fact, now that I am meeting dozens upon dozens of Canadians from all walks of life, they are looking worse than Americans.)

              But for Americans, it does not go down at all. As a people, they'll never ever accept that fact, because they'll never know it for at least two reasons. (1) They are too over worked and undereducated to find out for themselves, and (2) American corporate media machinery will never let them hear of it. Americans are screwed, blued and tattooed.

              And for that I blame Anderson Cooper. That's right, CNN's boyishly good looking, sincere faced, Emmy Award winning Anderson Cooper. Let me explain.

              Between the corporate and financial elites and the slobbering masses stands the American Information Class -- the reporters, talking heads, news anchors and pundits. In short, the entire gaggle of meat puppets and journalism hacks who have been cultivated and bred to be clueless by the university industry and others serving our corporate empire. In other words, serving global capitalism, and the national fictions it maintains, including that sizable piece of corporate feudal turf known as America. And that fiction is maintained through la danse des marionnettes de viande.
              .
              .
              .
              .
              .
              and - There ain't no escape from collapse

              In response to a letter from a reader (Joe, why did you crap out on us?), you wrote: "Places like Ecuador, northern California -- all sorts of places -- creating little spots of sustainability as best as possible."

              Since the US is the nexus of all the fraud, empire, control, and will thus be the center of the pain in the upcoming financial collapse (AND contains a huge percentage of "useless eaters", i.e. superfluous workers) have you given any thought as to where the best places/countries in the world will be to "hang out" while the Collective Madness and Economic Collapse take over?

              Thanks,
              Kevin

              ------
              Kevin,

              Well, I don't think it's possible to "hang out" until the collapse is over. For starters, it could take 50 years. Or it could take five years. If we knew, more people would probably get off their asses, even in America. But I don't think it will be all at once, or even recognizable at any given moment to techno-hybridized Americans on the ground. For example, most Americans STILL do not recognize the irreversible ecological collapse so well underway. More aware thinkers are calling this "denial," but it is not. They are simply experiencing the world they see before them, as honestly as their senses and experience permit. And that ain't much.

              Thanks to technology and layers upon layers of mediation by TV, movies, the Internet, etc., gadgets and manufactured imagery, we all live many steps removed from reality. Collapse is symbolized to each of us in different ways. To some it would be the sustained malfunction and lack of access of the Internet, which is surely coming.

              Incidentally, this will be capitalized upon by privatizing the net and selling access at a much higher price, just as with oil. Of course they will experience it as "the consumers" they have been reduced to. So they will see it as bad guys charging money for things that used to be free. Given that their consciousness is a product of technology and its false promise of solutions and endless plentitude, they can never understand that everything is a finite resource and that technology itself can reach such a point of complexity as to be unsustainable. Even your laptop and router is made of petroleum and both eat oil or coal.

              Others might perceive collapse as banking failure, given their absolute belief that money is the blood of society -- a capitalist hallucination if ever there was one. My point is that many will not even understand that collapse is going on because capitalism will provide excuses and more fake solutions at ever higher prices -- mainly at the expense of the world's poor and defenseless of course -- until it can no longer extract from them through banking, military force, or other means. This slows down the inevitable and helps the western world maintain its disastrous belief systems. None of which answers your question, but I just had to say it.

              There is really no "safe place" to run. For instance, the banking system may utterly fail; actually, it already has, yet no one is calling for an entirely new system. This shows you both the thoroughness of indoctrination of the American people, and the astuteness of the overlords who profit from the masses. Gasoline for cars can become nearly unavailable, and energy prices can become exorbitant, as they are becoming in the UK. And again, people will slowly learn to suck it up, and the system will roll on for a while longer. The more perceptive among them will dream, and are now dreaming, of escape.

              Escape as they conceive it does not exist.
              .
              .
              .
              .
              .
              .

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Joe Bageant

                Originally posted by don View Post
                (Nevertheless, I reluctantly voted for Obama. At the time it seemed It was either Obama, or continuing war, debt, and diminishing civil liberties. Ha!) Hope is magic thinking, believing that somehow, some larger unknown force is in motion to set things right.
                Hahahaha, we still have 'continuing war, debt, and diminishing civil liberties"

                George Carlin said it best

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Joe Bageant

                  The electoral process in a society where money is power and most people don't have any can only be fake democracy. The real power in society was never elected to office and it can't be unelected. I don't recall ever seeing Goldman Sachs on the ballot.

                  What we need is not hope in some politician but confidence in ourselves and each other. It's easy to take a snapshot of the situation now and despair of any possibility of change. We need to see the movie, the decades-long story of how we got here. In the late 1960s and early '70s millions of ordinary Americans were engaged in struggle against elite power--in the streets, on the campuses, on the factory floor, and in the military. We were part of a global "revolution of rising expectations" that scared the hell out of the powerful, capitalist and communist alike. In the early '70s world elites went on the counteroffensive. What we're seeing now is the result of nearly four decades of all-out effort by the most powerful rulers in history to defeat people's sense of possibility.

                  A new world is possible, but we need to find the source of that new vision in each other.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Joe Bageant

                    Originally posted by Dave Stratman View Post

                    What we need is not hope in some politician but confidence in ourselves and each other. It's easy to take a snapshot of the situation now and despair of any possibility of change. We need to see the movie, the decades-long story of how we got here. In the late 1960s and early '70s millions of ordinary Americans were engaged in struggle against elite power--in the streets, on the campuses, on the factory floor, and in the military. We were part of a global "revolution of rising expectations" that scared the hell out of the powerful, capitalist and communist alike. In the early '70s world elites went on the counteroffensive.
                    Those people were utterly confused, they were bought for and run by the elites to destroy the family and household structure. Most of that revolutionary crap was about 'culture' and not about the 'economy'. It was about rebellion from parents, drugs, feminism, race riots, and other cultural crap, look where thats gotten us. You should also remember that was the baby boomer generation, quite possibly the most egomaniacal 'generation' of humans ever.

                    You are confusing cultural 'revolutions/changes' with economic 'changes'.

                    Heres a nice summary, documentary called century of self. This is part 1 there are 4 parts



                    A new world is possible, but we need to find the source of that new vision in each other.
                    More hope, eh, enjoy yourself.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Joe Bageant

                      Thanks, Rajiv, for the Bageant update.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Joe Bageant

                        http://www.joebageant.com/joe/2010/0...on-cooper.html

                        Interesting rant. He lumps in Vanity Fair, and that may have been just a passing rhetorical flair, and as one who's never read VF (not even CH's stuff in VF) I have to ask -

                        Did Christopher Hitchens write NOTHING good when he was @ Vanity Fair?

                        Or does Bageant think that atheist Hitchens, who's intelligent enough to know the score & who once subjected Mother Theresa to a book length skewering is a status quo mouthpiece?

                        Seems to me considering this: Bageant & CH are kindred spirits in some areas

                        http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/030...SIN=030733936X


                        Originally posted by Rajiv View Post

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Joe Bageant

                          Originally posted by chr5648 View Post
                          Those people were utterly confused, they were bought for and run by the elites to destroy the family and household structure. Most of that revolutionary crap was about 'culture' and not about the 'economy'. It was about rebellion from parents, drugs, feminism, race riots, and other cultural crap, look where thats gotten us. You should also remember that was the baby boomer generation, quite possibly the most egomaniacal 'generation' of humans ever.

                          You are confusing cultural 'revolutions/changes' with economic 'changes'.
                          The movements of the '60s and '70s inevitably reflected to one degree or another the society they were trying to change. The movements were shot through with struggle over their goals and values. The ruling class constantly sought to penetrate and control these movements with self-seeking capitalist ideas and values, while most individuals in the movements were struggling to get clear on a different path for society and on different, more humane values.

                          Given the pervasive power of capitalist culture and propaganda, it is hardly surprising that people--whether workers rebelling against their union leaders and the company, students at Ivy League or state campuses, black people of every age, women of various backgrounds, soldiers in Vietnam--would experience some confusion in precisely identifying what the problem was and what the solution.

                          But to dismiss their often heroic efforts, sometimes done at great personal risk, as "bought for and run by the elites" strikes me as mean-spirited and ignorant. Are you referring here to black people who faced cops and dogs to gain equal rights? To the millions of Americans who demonstrated against the Vietnam War? To soldiers who organized rebellions or refused to fight or who fragged their officers? Workers who organized wildcat strikes and slowdowns?

                          There was a constant battle in the movements--as there is in all of society--over solidarity versus competition, equality versus inequality. Should blacks and whites unite in a common struggle against the ruling class? Or are whites the enemy? Should men and women unite as equals against the ruling class, or are men the enemy of women? Is the family the locus of human development and solidarity, or is it the basic unit of male oppression? Are the unions on the side of the workers or are they an arm of management? Should working people fight for better wages and conditions or seek to end class exploitation and the profit system?

                          The people involved in the movements for change were overwhelmingly positive in their intentions, but obviously they failed to make a revolution (revolution was the conscious goal of only a fraction of the US movements). In the end the movements were subverted in such a way as to strengthen capitalist dominance of society. The movement for racial equality degenerated into the thoroughly capitalist idea of black nationalism, black entrepreneurship, affirmative action, etc. The struggle for gender equality degenerated into a self-seeking, anti-male, corporate feminism.

                          In other words the movements were not strong enough to overcome the capitalist framework in which they operated. By the end of the 1970s they had descended into identity politics--Gay Liberation, Black Liberation, Women's Liberation. Instead of an equal society, they settled for a perfectly unequal one: that is, a society in which each identity group would be proportionately represented at each level of an increasingly unequal society.

                          Given the pervasiveness of capitalist culture as a weapon very consciously utilized by ruling elites to control people (as demonstrated by the "Century of the Self"), I don't understand why you object to the movements of the '60s being largely about culture. They were about the way people relate to each other and about the role of ordinary people in society: what values should shape society, what goals it should pursue, and who should control it. The most fundamental questions about the economy--Should production be for profit or for use? Who should own the means of production? How should work be organized and who should organize it?--are subsets of these questions.

                          Finally, characterizing and blaming a generation of people for the state of the world is simply foolish. I think you're taking elite propaganda much too seriously.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Joe Bageant




                            Ecclesiastes 1



                            1 The words of the Preacher, the son of David, king in Jerusalem.
                            2 Vanity of vanities, said the Preacher, vanity of vanities; all is vanity.
                            3 What profit has a man of all his labor which he takes under the sun?
                            4 One generation passes away, and another generation comes: but the earth stays for ever.
                            5 The sun also rises, and the sun goes down, and hastens to his place where he arose.
                            6 The wind goes toward the south, and turns about to the north; it whirls about continually, and the wind returns again according to his circuits.
                            7 All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full; to the place from where the rivers come, thither they return again.
                            8 All things are full of labor; man cannot utter it: the eye is not satisfied with seeing, nor the ear filled with hearing.
                            9 The thing that has been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.
                            10 Is there any thing whereof it may be said, See, this is new? it has been already of old time, which was before us.
                            11 There is no remembrance of former things; neither shall there be any remembrance of things that are to come with those that shall come after.
                            12 I the Preacher was king over Israel in Jerusalem. 13 And I gave my heart to seek and search out by wisdom concerning all things that are done under heaven: this sore travail has God given to the sons of man to be exercised therewith. 14 I have seen all the works that are done under the sun; and, behold, all is vanity and vexation of spirit. 15 That which is crooked cannot be made straight: and that which is wanting cannot be numbered.
                            16 I communed with my own heart, saying, See, I am come to great estate, and have gotten more wisdom than all they that have been before me in Jerusalem: yes, my heart had great experience of wisdom and knowledge. 17 And I gave my heart to know wisdom, and to know madness and folly: I perceived that this also is vexation of spirit. 18 For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increases knowledge increases sorrow.



                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Joe Bageant

                              Originally posted by Dave Stratman View Post
                              The movements of the '60s and '70s inevitably reflected to one degree or another the society they were trying to change. The movements were shot through with struggle over their goals and values. The ruling class constantly sought to penetrate and control these movements with self-seeking capitalist ideas and values, while most individuals in the movements were struggling to get clear on a different path for society and on different, more humane values.

                              Given the pervasive power of capitalist culture and propaganda, it is hardly surprising that people--whether workers rebelling against their union leaders and the company, students at Ivy League or state campuses, black people of every age, women of various backgrounds, soldiers in Vietnam--would experience some confusion in precisely identifying what the problem was and what the solution.

                              But to dismiss their often heroic efforts, sometimes done at great personal risk, as "bought for and run by the elites" strikes me as mean-spirited and ignorant. Are you referring here to black people who faced cops and dogs to gain equal rights? To the millions of Americans who demonstrated against the Vietnam War? To soldiers who organized rebellions or refused to fight or who fragged their officers? Workers who organized wildcat strikes and slowdowns?

                              There was a constant battle in the movements--as there is in all of society--over solidarity versus competition, equality versus inequality. Should blacks and whites unite in a common struggle against the ruling class? Or are whites the enemy? Should men and women unite as equals against the ruling class, or are men the enemy of women? Is the family the locus of human development and solidarity, or is it the basic unit of male oppression? Are the unions on the side of the workers or are they an arm of management? Should working people fight for better wages and conditions or seek to end class exploitation and the profit system?

                              The people involved in the movements for change were overwhelmingly positive in their intentions, but obviously they failed to make a revolution (revolution was the conscious goal of only a fraction of the US movements). In the end the movements were subverted in such a way as to strengthen capitalist dominance of society. The movement for racial equality degenerated into the thoroughly capitalist idea of black nationalism, black entrepreneurship, affirmative action, etc. The struggle for gender equality degenerated into a self-seeking, anti-male, corporate feminism.

                              In other words the movements were not strong enough to overcome the capitalist framework in which they operated. By the end of the 1970s they had descended into identity politics--Gay Liberation, Black Liberation, Women's Liberation. Instead of an equal society, they settled for a perfectly unequal one: that is, a society in which each identity group would be proportionately represented at each level of an increasingly unequal society.

                              Given the pervasiveness of capitalist culture as a weapon very consciously utilized by ruling elites to control people (as demonstrated by the "Century of the Self"), I don't understand why you object to the movements of the '60s being largely about culture. They were about the way people relate to each other and about the role of ordinary people in society: what values should shape society, what goals it should pursue, and who should control it. The most fundamental questions about the economy--Should production be for profit or for use? Who should own the means of production? How should work be organized and who should organize it?--are subsets of these questions.

                              Finally, characterizing and blaming a generation of people for the state of the world is simply foolish. I think you're taking elite propaganda much too seriously.
                              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_standard

                              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_Shock

                              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_are_all_Keynesians_now

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X