Originally posted by Woodsman
View Post
well.. fair enough, guess i am as well - so...
You could say it's my hammer so of course everything looks just like a nail. You have to make the call on that one.
Take it as nothing more than my opinion because in the end it is. I don't have perfect knowledge and they are still releasing documents. Thus my POV is worth about as much as the fellow two bar stools down from me.
Take it as nothing more than my opinion because in the end it is. I don't have perfect knowledge and they are still releasing documents. Thus my POV is worth about as much as the fellow two bar stools down from me.
I spent a fair amount of time reading, writing and teaching this stuff in a younger life. That's why you find yourself enduring it here, lek. If your eyes start to glaze over every time you hear me revving up, imagine what the poor souls in Woodsman's household must endure.
But fond remembrance for the good old days? Oh, hell yes. And the 70s.
If you're interested, I think these guys have a pretty good handle on what JFK and the Chiefs thought of each other's intellectual and moral capabilities. I think the Caribbean Crisis is relevant here for a number of reasons. If I had to pick one, well since we're talking about the potential reactions of US leadership in the face of a perceived existential threat and nukes are in consideration, the Cuban Missile Crisis is about the best real world example we'll ever have of that (god willing and knock on wood).
my guess JFK and his jointchiefs would've wet themselves ROTFL(their)AO at whats happened since 20jan2009
and methinks Ike's would've cried.
my other point?
best as eye can tell by whats been happnin (since 09) is that we mights well just close most if not all of the overseas .mil bases - cept for the strategic air/sub bases - and BRING ALL THE TROOPS HOME.
since The US no longer has the will (balls) to USE the awesome power that TRILLIONS AND TRILLIONS have been spent (mostly wasted) on developing it - and events since 09 - in particular - have proven it.
esp when the farce of - SYRIAOUSLY ?? - the recent exploits in the mideast are concerned
then we have the other JFK - the same one that was FOR the wars - both nam and iraq - until he threw his medals at the whitehouse while partyin with jane&co - and now he's all gung-ho again ? - what - he dont really think he can beat ole hilary, now do he?
;)
Leave a comment: