Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Big Trouble in Little China

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • touchring
    replied
    Re: Big Trouble in Little China

    I think it's going to be bad, not just Africa. Even in more advanced countries, a lot of people will be in trouble next year. Junk processed food is cheap but still bad. Governments can stock up, while individuals can do the same.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris Coles
    replied
    Re: Big Trouble in Little China

    Originally posted by touchring View Post
    China won't have food issues as they will be buying up grains from all over the world. And then, it will be "grain diplomacy" for poor african countries.
    Then if the African's are left to starve by the actions of the CCP, then we must also include the African's. Civilisation, demands we do our best.

    Leave a comment:


  • touchring
    replied
    Re: Big Trouble in Little China

    China won't have food issues as they will be buying up grains from all over the world. And then, it will be "grain diplomacy" for poor african countries.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mega
    replied
    Re: Big Trouble in Little China

    The CCP has deep pockets, let them SPEND some of those $ they have.
    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris Coles
    replied
    Re: Big Trouble in Little China

    Mega, there is a point of view that if natural disaster brings a great famine to any nation; including China, then the rest of the world should do their best to support the people. By people, I mean the citizens, not the CCP.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mega
    replied
    Re: Big Trouble in Little China

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris Coles
    replied
    Re: Big Trouble in Little China

    Originally posted by Chris Coles View Post
    Shiny, thanks for your comment. However, recently we had a TV report titled Global Dimming. What that showed was the long term effects of the overall loss of sunlight reaching the surface from high altitude air pollution. But of greater interest was the revelation caused by the three days after 9/11, where no aircraft flew over the entire US nation; and the surface temperature rose by nearly 3C. Indeed it was that that prompted the TV program being made.

    Now realise, again, something not being discussed; instead of no aircraft flying for three days we have had almost all aircraft grounded over the entire planet for several months and still not back to full deployment. That will, inevitably, raise the surface temperature; particularly over the oceans, resulting in much more water vapour being carried in the atmosphere. Again, that extra energy will remain held in the oceans.

    Here in the UK we experience a maritime climate; our weather is always deeply influenced by the airflow from off the Atlantic ocean. Here we have seen a marked change in our overall weather patterns during the last two decades; particularly increased rainfall and the length of the periods of such increased rainfall. When you have lived through repeated events of more than 100 days continuous rain, day after day; when such was NEVER experienced before in a long lifetime, you start to realise that we are not under the influence of a short term change, but a long term deterioration.

    Again, as I regularly attend major conferences in the likes of London and Paris I keep meeting others from the European continent that have also come to realise something is very different about our weather here in the Northern latitudes. The further North, the greater the effects.
    https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/im...-death-valley?

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris Coles
    replied
    Re: Big Trouble in Little China

    Originally posted by shiny! View Post
    There's a La Nina system in place this year making some parts of the world excessively wet, other parts excessively dry. In Arizona and Southern California we've had a high pressure system sitting on top of us all summer, not letting the seasonal rain currents enter to cool things off. In New Mexico to the east of us, they've gotten their annual monsoon rain. Next year could see the reverse. It's what I like to call WEATHER.

    People look at the lack of rainfall in Southern California and say it's Global Warming. If they would look at historical records going back farther than human settlement, they'd realize that hot and dry is the norm, but when modern settlers settled within the last 150 years, they arrived during an atypical mild period with more than average rain. Now that the climate is reverting to form, they cry Global Warming. Nature is doing it's thing and we're taking it personally.
    Shiny, thanks for your comment. However, recently we had a TV report titled Global Dimming. What that showed was the long term effects of the overall loss of sunlight reaching the surface from high altitude air pollution. But of greater interest was the revelation caused by the three days after 9/11, where no aircraft flew over the entire US nation; and the surface temperature rose by nearly 3C. Indeed it was that that prompted the TV program being made.

    Now realise, again, something not being discussed; instead of no aircraft flying for three days we have had almost all aircraft grounded over the entire planet for several months and still not back to full deployment. That will, inevitably, raise the surface temperature; particularly over the oceans, resulting in much more water vapour being carried in the atmosphere. Again, that extra energy will remain held in the oceans.

    Here in the UK we experience a maritime climate; our weather is always deeply influenced by the airflow from off the Atlantic ocean. Here we have seen a marked change in our overall weather patterns during the last two decades; particularly increased rainfall and the length of the periods of such increased rainfall. When you have lived through repeated events of more than 100 days continuous rain, day after day; when such was NEVER experienced before in a long lifetime, you start to realise that we are not under the influence of a short term change, but a long term deterioration.

    Again, as I regularly attend major conferences in the likes of London and Paris I keep meeting others from the European continent that have also come to realise something is very different about our weather here in the Northern latitudes. The further North, the greater the effects.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chris Coles
    replied
    Re: Big Trouble in Little China

    Originally posted by Mega View Post
    If like me you regularly walk the roads for several miles, you will have noticed how larger rainfall raindrops fall from trees overlooking a road, and how the road surface is eroded by those larger rain drops. Now look again at the water flows from the dam; they are not like a tube of water but immensely turbulent. It is that turbulence that will, eventually completely erode the interior of those outlets. It seems reasonable to assume that the outlets were not designed for continuous use. Then again, the water height is declared as 72 meters; when the full height spillway is 175 meters. While there may be erosion problems to be addressed in the future; it remains my opinion that the designers were competent and that the dam will remain in service without failure.

    What we are observing is the attempt to balance flooding both up and downstream during extreme weather events. A unenviable responsibility.

    Leave a comment:


  • Techdread
    replied
    Re: Big Trouble in Little China

    Looks like they made a good call in opening the floodgates in late June.

    So they are not just using their supercomputers for military and surveillance purposes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mega
    replied
    Re: Big Trouble in Little China

    Leave a comment:


  • Mega
    replied
    Re: Big Trouble in Little China

    Leave a comment:


  • touchring
    replied
    Re: Big Trouble in Little China

    Meanwhile in downstream Wuhan, last weekend, a different kind of water party.

    Leave a comment:


  • touchring
    replied
    Re: Big Trouble in Little China

    Originally posted by Chris Coles View Post
    2. That no one gave full thought to the effects both up and down stream of such an event; particularly if the rainfall was beyond their original calculations.

    It would seem that China is in the process of experiencing what we are here; a massive increase in rainfall and associated weather events; well beyond expectations of the original designers of the dam. Moreover, this may well be just the start, we may be about to witness what one might describe as the plant's weather totally out of control; beyond any previous expectation. I am very glad I live at the top of the highest hills in my region.
    If a smaller dam downstream gives way and causes a sudden fall in water levels downstream, and if upstream water levels are still at the peak, can the dam still hold up despite the huge pressure differences? If not, this means all the nearby dams are equally important and must hold up.

    Leave a comment:


  • shiny!
    replied
    Re: Big Trouble in Little China

    Originally posted by Chris Coles View Post
    The underlying problem is very simple; global warming has, (certainly here in the UK), massively accelerated the rate of temperature rise. For example, here the BBC weather forecasters have been putting up details of the maximum temperature every summer up to last year. It never got higher than 30C over the last decade. Last summer we had a high of 38.7; this year we have just had 6 days continuous above 34C, reaching 36C. Now today and tomorrow we are in the process of experiencing what they keep telling us would normally be autumn weather, a low pressure right up alongside Ireland, giving strong winds and much rain. So when we look at China, what we see is that suddenly, they are experiencing very heavy rain upstream of the three gorges dam and they have already let so much rain out of the reservoir; the downstream cities are already in trouble.

    Having given this debate some thought I have come to the conclusion that with the dam spillway, the top level of water being 175 metres, well above present levels; two things are important. 1. We should be confident that the designers have built a dam that will remain secure with the reservoir at that level with the full flow then passing over that spillway. 2. That no one gave full thought to the effects both up and down stream of such an event; particularly if the rainfall was beyond their original calculations.

    It would seem that China is in the process of experiencing what we are here; a massive increase in rainfall and associated weather events; well beyond expectations of the original designers of the dam. Moreover, this may well be just the start, we may be about to witness what one might describe as the plant's weather totally out of control; beyond any previous expectation. I am very glad I live at the top of the highest hills in my region.
    There's a La Nina system in place this year making some parts of the world excessively wet, other parts excessively dry. In Arizona and Southern California we've had a high pressure system sitting on top of us all summer, not letting the seasonal rain currents enter to cool things off. In New Mexico to the east of us, they've gotten their annual monsoon rain. Next year could see the reverse. It's what I like to call WEATHER.

    People look at the lack of rainfall in Southern California and say it's Global Warming. If they would look at historical records going back farther than human settlement, they'd realize that hot and dry is the norm, but when modern settlers settled within the last 150 years, they arrived during an atypical mild period with more than average rain. Now that the climate is reverting to form, they cry Global Warming. Nature is doing it's thing and we're taking it personally.
    Last edited by shiny!; 08-19-20, 04:24 PM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X