iTulip.com Commentary - Aug. 2002Housing Bubble - Center for Economic and Policy Research - Aug. 2002 | After Irrational Exuberance - American Enterprise Institute - Sept. 2002


Go to the new iTulip.com
iTulip.com the Internet Company Parody
Company Background
Frequently Asked Questions
Products
Monthly Letter From the Prez
Business Plan
Press
Contact Us
Letters to the Editor
Advertise at iTulip.com
Alan Greenspan Interview
The Day the NASDAQ Died
 
 
Read our New Guestbook
Sign our New Guestbook
View our Old Guestbook
 
Dreambook
 


Test your knowledge of the Greenspan 1990s Credit Bubble!
Answers


"Free Advice and Worth Every Penny!"
The Internet Stock Mania Company
logo
Riding the Internet Wave
Founded November 1998
Over 2,800,000 Visitors

"Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent."  - John Maynard Keynes

Fnancial market articles and stuff
Greenspan's Thoughts

 
iTulip.com accepts donations. Click here.
Use of Proceeds from Sales and Donations

Best of iTulip.com
Debtor Nation
Fate of U.S. Dollar
Bubble Buffoons
Flying Pig Awards
Recession
Commentary

What's iTulip.com?
iTulip.com adj : a corporation that relies on the Internet to deliver products or services to its customers at a loss : an uneconomical Internet-dependent business as a : requires private or public capital to maintain unprofitable operations indefinitely  b : raises capital through the public markets to achieve an historically unprecedented market capitalization induced by the stock performance of similar companies, none of which are profitable
Feb. 2001 The Guardian said, "And then there is iTulip.com.  Launched ahead of its time, in 1998, the site has long since given up warning about the internet bubble. They're previewing the Greenspan economic wasteland now."  Bill Griffeth first described iTulip.com on CNBC Feb. 9, 1999 as, "...the place to go for a contrary view of the markets."  USA Today called iTulip.com, "an acerbic, informative Web site that never misses a chance to skewer what it considers to be modern America's answer to tulip mania: the technology-stock craze."  Barron's described iTulip.com as, "A quirky site with a very serious message."  See our press page for more stories about iTulip.com from The Boston Globe, Reuters, BBC News, Smart Money, Money Magazine, Institutional Investor, Forbes, Washington Post, Fox News and others.

Reality at the SEC    |    Fiendbear    |    Daily Reckoning    |    Fall Street    |    Prudent Bear

For the Record

iTulip.com's success at making predictions based on contrarian evidence is mixed but good on balance.  Here's a brief chronology of the site's record.  Keep in mind that for the most part these predictions were considered more or less heretical at the time, judging by some of the vigorously worded hostile email we received from visitors.

November 1998 - Stated that the stock market itself and Internet stocks in particular represented an asset bubble that we owed to a special set of economic, political and market conditions that attend all financial manias.  The bubble began in 1996 where the bull market ended, following a policy change by the US Fed to permit the broad money supply M3 to increase at historically abnormal rates (M3 grew 4% from 1990 - 1995 and 32% from 1995 to 1999) and an influx of foreign investment that doubled foreign holdings of US debt between 1995 and 1999.

December 1998 - Described how financial bubbles form, their characteristics and how the US stock market bubble conformed to the profile.

January 1999 - On Internet stock prices, we predicted: "The average Internet stock will lose 87% of peak price."  As of November 27 2000 our index of Internet stocks was down 85.48%.  Safe to say the index is off more than 90% today.

August 1999 - On Y2K, we predicted: "What the heck's gonna go down after Dec. 31, 1999?  Do we at iTulip.com envision a world in chaos ruled by tribal warlords marauding the strife torn land in ox drawn Rolls Royces, plundering suburban America for precious caches of bottled water and canned tuna fish?  Time to invest in a bomb silo apartment?  Nah.  After the clocks roll over into 2000, a lot of crappy software that doesn't work very well and breaks all the time will continue to be crappy and not work very well and break all the time."

October 18, 1999 - On the market crash, we predicted that the market was to crash on October 19th.  This was unwise and broke with our tradition of not attempting to target specific dates, a tradition we returned to after that.  We did, however, anticipate the NASDAQ drop on April 16 by taking note of trends that paralleled past bubble declines that we detailed in We're Almost There on March 6, 2000.

November 24, 1999 - On the triggers for the future collapse of the Internet stock bubble: "Credit Squeeze, Bankruptcy, Fraud, and Weakness in the Real Economy."  The first of these triggers, revelations of fraud, did not occur until the early part of 2000 with announcements of accounting irregularities among certain Internet companies.  The credit squeeze did not really begin until late March, the delayed effect of Fed tightening nine months earlier.  Bankruptcies among the dot coms are only just now beginning. Weakness in the real economy will not show up until Q3 or Q4 2000.

March 6, 2000 - Near the final top in Internet stocks, we predicted: "Careful students of financial manias -- and daily readers of iTulip.com -- know that the entire world and a wide array of economic segments of each nation's society need become engaged in a speculative mania for it to develop to the terminal stage..."

April 5, 2000 - On the bear market, we predicted: "A bear market is born."

April 16, 2000 - On Recession 2000, we predicted: "We believe that this crash is the result of the markets pricing in a long overdue US recession."  We will have to wait another six months before this prediction is proved accurate or not.


Post-Bubble Economic Collapse
Predictable, Inexorable, Non-Linear, Torturously Slow


The Great Machine grinds down

World Financial Crisis
Pink Slip Update
248,645 Laid Off from Forbes 500
Since January 1, 2002
Recession Poll



Today's Story First Half 2001 Archive

Today's Story Archive: 1999 - 2001



 

Each 1,000,000 new unemployed = 1% rise in unemployment
Unemployment Predictions - Revised 8.9.02
Predicted unemployment rate end of 2001: 6%
Predicted unemployment rate end of 2002: 7.5%
Predicted unemployment rate end of 2003: 10%

Commentary - August 20, 2002 


Yes.  It's a housing bubble.

Debate rages today about whether or not a housing bubble exists in the U.S.  The fact that there is even any controversy about the bubble's existence testifies to the power of the forces of misinformation and proves that the long habit of wishful thinking among the millions of victims of the so-called New Economy has yet to start to dissipate.  But we're used to that.  We recall the debate that we endured in the late 1990s on the existence of a bubble in stocks when iTulip.com first opened shop.  In those days, nearly everyone was in on the game of justifying the bubble.  Alan Greenspan said in testimony before the U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee June 1999, "But bubbles generally are perceptible only after the fact. To spot a bubble in advance requires a judgment that hundreds of thousands of informed investors have it all wrong."  At the time, we dug up a similarly evasive statement by Professor Lawrence of Princeton University in September 1929 when he said, "[T]he consensus of judgment of millions whose valuations function on that admirable market... is that stocks are not at present over-valued.  Where is that group of men with the all-embracing wisdom which will entitle them to veto the judgment of this intelligent multitude?"  Today, Greenspan is in the no-bubble camp again, this time defending historically anomalous housing price appreciation with statements that are reminiscent of his defenses of stock valuations during the stock market bubble.  Who is the Fed to say that prices are too high?  Markets know best.

Fact is, housing bubbles, like stock market bubbles, are not at all hard to spot.  We grant that they are politically challenging to discuss in public, especially when they are needed to prevent the aftermath of a previous monetary disaster, the 1990s stock market bubble, from dragging the real economy into a deflationary depression.  Putting aside New Economy obfuscation, the measure of a stock market bubble is simple: prices rise much faster than future earnings possibly can.  A stock market bubble looks like this...

More...



2002 Commentary Archive

Land of Broken Dreams - August 9, 2002



iTulip.com T-shirts here

iTulip.com Stock Certificates are here

Market Action

August 2, 2001

Dow 8,313.13 -193.49 (-2.23%)
 
Nasdaq 1,247.92 -32.08 (-2.51%)



When it's all over...

The United States of America files for bankruptcy protection

Click to see bankruptcy filing


"The fate of the world economy is now totally dependent on the U.S. stock market, whose growth is dependent on about 50 stocks, half of which have never reported any earnings." 

Paul Volcker 
Ex-Chairman of the Federal Reserve 
September, 1999



| Quick Comment Archive | Comments?  | Join Our Mailing List |
Search this site or the web        powered by FreeFind

Site search Web search


iTulip.com Ka-Poom Post-Bubble U.S. Economy Theory - November 2000
1.  Investment Dollars for No-Hope Companies Dry Up

2.  Inventory Investements Drop, Capital Equipment Sales Collapse

3.  Capital Equipment Producer Layoffs Rise, Job Creation Drops

4.  Overleveraged Consumers Become Concerned and Belatedly Start to Save

5.  Consumer Product & Service Layoffs Skyrocket, Job Creation Plummets

6.  Ka - Defaults Soar on Consumer Debt and Mortgages, Asset Prices Fall

7.  Poom - Run on the Dollar, Inflation Takes Off Like a Rocket

| Commentaries Archive | Comments?  | Join Our Mailing List |
Top


It was Greenspan's bubble.  We just lived in it.


iTulip.com Founders

About iTulip.com Spinning Head Technology

Top



The information herein is based on sources which we believe to be reliable, but we cannot warrant its accuracy or completeness. Such information is subject to change and is not intended to influence your investment decisions.
Disclaimers and Legal Stuff Our Lawyer Made us Put Here

Copyright 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 Osborn Capital, LLC

Estragon: I can't go on like this.

Vladimir: That's what you think.

    - Samuel Beckett, Waiting For Godot