Test your knowledge of the Greenspan 1990s Credit Bubble!
"Free Advice and Worth Every Penny!"
"Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent." - John Maynard Keynes
| || || || || || || |
adj : a corporation that relies on the Internet to deliver products or
services to its customers at a loss : an uneconomical
business as a : requires private or public capital
operations indefinitely b : raises
capital through the
markets to achieve an historically unprecedented market capitalization
induced by the stock performance of similar companies, none of which
profitable ||Feb. 2001 The Guardian said, "And then there is iTulip.com. Launched ahead of its time, in 1998, the site has long since given up warning about the internet bubble. They're previewing the Greenspan economic wasteland now." Bill Griffeth first described iTulip.com on CNBC Feb. 9, 1999 as, "...the place to go for a contrary view of the markets." USA Today called iTulip.com, "an acerbic, informative Web site that never misses a chance to skewer what it considers to be modern America's answer to tulip mania: the technology-stock craze." Barron's described iTulip.com as, "A quirky site with a very serious message." See our press page for more stories about iTulip.com from The Boston Globe, Reuters, BBC News, Smart Money, Money Magazine, Institutional Investor, Forbes, Washington Post, Fox News and others.|
November 1998 - Stated that the stock market itself and Internet stocks in particular represented an asset bubble that we owed to a special set of economic, political and market conditions that attend all financial manias. The bubble began in 1996 where the bull market ended, following a policy change by the US Fed to permit the broad money supply M3 to increase at historically abnormal rates (M3 grew 4% from 1990 - 1995 and 32% from 1995 to 1999) and an influx of foreign investment that doubled foreign holdings of US debt between 1995 and 1999.
December 1998 - Described how financial bubbles form, their characteristics and how the US stock market bubble conformed to the profile.
January 1999 - On Internet stock prices, we predicted: "The average Internet stock will lose 87% of peak price." As of November 27 2000 our index of Internet stocks was down 85.48%. Safe to say the index is off more than 90% today.
August 1999 - On Y2K, we predicted: "What the heck's gonna go down after Dec. 31, 1999? Do we at iTulip.com envision a world in chaos ruled by tribal warlords marauding the strife torn land in ox drawn Rolls Royces, plundering suburban America for precious caches of bottled water and canned tuna fish? Time to invest in a bomb silo apartment? Nah. After the clocks roll over into 2000, a lot of crappy software that doesn't work very well and breaks all the time will continue to be crappy and not work very well and break all the time."
October 18, 1999 - On the market crash, we predicted that the market was to crash on October 19th. This was unwise and broke with our tradition of not attempting to target specific dates, a tradition we returned to after that. We did, however, anticipate the NASDAQ drop on April 16 by taking note of trends that paralleled past bubble declines that we detailed in We're Almost There on March 6, 2000.
November 24, 1999 - On the triggers for the future collapse of the Internet stock bubble: "Credit Squeeze, Bankruptcy, Fraud, and Weakness in the Real Economy." The first of these triggers, revelations of fraud, did not occur until the early part of 2000 with announcements of accounting irregularities among certain Internet companies. The credit squeeze did not really begin until late March, the delayed effect of Fed tightening nine months earlier. Bankruptcies among the dot coms are only just now beginning. Weakness in the real economy will not show up until Q3 or Q4 2000.
March 6, 2000 - Near the final top in Internet stocks, we predicted: "Careful students of financial manias -- and daily readers of iTulip.com -- know that the entire world and a wide array of economic segments of each nation's society need become engaged in a speculative mania for it to develop to the terminal stage..."
April 5, 2000 - On the bear market, we predicted: "A bear market is born."
2000 - On Recession 2000, we predicted: "We believe that this
is the result of the markets pricing in a long overdue US
We will have to wait another six months before this prediction is
accurate or not.
Predictable, Inexorable, Non-Linear, Torturously Slow
Today's Story First Half 2001 Archive
Each 1,000,000 new unemployed =
1% rise in
Yes. It's a housing bubble.
Debate rages today about whether or not a housing bubble exists in the U.S. The fact that there is even any controversy about the bubble's existence testifies to the power of the forces of misinformation and proves that the long habit of wishful thinking among the millions of victims of the so-called New Economy has yet to start to dissipate. But we're used to that. We recall the debate that we endured in the late 1990s on the existence of a bubble in stocks when iTulip.com first opened shop. In those days, nearly everyone was in on the game of justifying the bubble. Alan Greenspan said in testimony before the U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee June 1999, "But bubbles generally are perceptible only after the fact. To spot a bubble in advance requires a judgment that hundreds of thousands of informed investors have it all wrong." At the time, we dug up a similarly evasive statement by Professor Lawrence of Princeton University in September 1929 when he said, "[T]he consensus of judgment of millions whose valuations function on that admirable market... is that stocks are not at present over-valued. Where is that group of men with the all-embracing wisdom which will entitle them to veto the judgment of this intelligent multitude?" Today, Greenspan is in the no-bubble camp again, this time defending historically anomalous housing price appreciation with statements that are reminiscent of his defenses of stock valuations during the stock market bubble. Who is the Fed to say that prices are too high? Markets know best.
Fact is, housing bubbles, like stock market bubbles, are not at all hard to spot. We grant that they are politically challenging to discuss in public, especially when they are needed to prevent the aftermath of a previous monetary disaster, the 1990s stock market bubble, from dragging the real economy into a deflationary depression. Putting aside New Economy obfuscation, the measure of a stock market bubble is simple: prices rise much faster than future earnings possibly can. A stock market bubble looks like this...
2002 Commentary Archive
August 2, 2001
When it's all over...
The United States of America files for bankruptcy protection
iTulip.com Ka-Poom Post-Bubble U.S. Economy Theory - November 2000
- Deflationary phase starts 2001 and ends in 2004
- Inflationary phase starts 2004 and ends 2006
1. Investment Dollars for No-Hope Companies Dry Up
2. Inventory Investements Drop, Capital Equipment Sales Collapse
3. Capital Equipment Producer Layoffs Rise, Job Creation Drops
4. Overleveraged Consumers Become Concerned and Belatedly Start to Save
5. Consumer Product & Service Layoffs Skyrocket, Job Creation Plummets
6. Ka - Defaults Soar on Consumer Debt and Mortgages, Asset Prices Fall
7. Poom - Run on the Dollar, Inflation Takes Off Like a Rocket
| Commentaries Archive | Comments? | Join Our Mailing List |
It was Greenspan's
bubble. We just lived in
About iTulip.com Spinning Head Technology
The information herein is based on sources which we believe to be reliable, but we cannot warrant its accuracy or completeness. Such information is subject to change and is not intended to influence your investment decisions.
1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 Osborn Capital, LLC
Estragon: I can't go on like this.
Vladimir: That's what you think.
- Samuel Beckett, Waiting For Godot