Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: Economic State Of The Union -- 2008

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    US, Europe and Asia
    Posts
    4,585

    Default Economic State Of The Union -- 2008

    The Economic State Of The Union -- 2008

    by Charles McMillion, President and chief economist of MBG Information Services in Washington, D.C.

    As we head into another recession and hear politicians tell us how recession can be avoided with stimulus packages that further expand household and government debt, remember that between 2001 and the end of 2007 each new job created by these same methods cost $1.8 million per job in new debt liabilities.

    In just the past seven years, U.S. household debt almost doubled and federal debt soared by near two-thirds, rocketing by a combined $10.5 trillion. The total combined debt of households ($14.4 trillion) and the federal government ($9.2 trillion) is now 168 percent of GDP, far higher even than in the brief spike during World War II. All other levels and ratios of debt also have soared far beyond any past precedent.

    Yet, this record-shattering explosion of debt stimulus created the weakest seven-year job growth (4.4 percent) and one of the weakest periods of real GDP growth (18.1 percent) since the Depression: less than 6 million new jobs ($1.8 million of debt per job) and a mere $4 trillion increase in GDP.

    This period began with the collapse of Wall Street's stock market bubble from the late 1990s and ends now with the collapse of Wall Street's housing and other debt bubbles. That such massive mortgage and consumer borrowing, tax cuts and war spending produced such remarkably weak real economic results suggests the months and years ahead could be quite difficult.

    Yet, along with the Fed rate cuts for cheaper debt, the only policies seriously considered by this year's crop of Wall Street-funded political candidates is more short-term household and federal debt "stimulus." Locked into a failed, 30-year-old ideology of deregulation and debt, there is still no option to compete with the remarkably effective industrial and trade policies pursued by China and others.

    2008 will be the ninth consecutive year the U.S. economy grows slower than the world's growth while China grows more than three times faster. In the past seven years of sluggish growth, the United States accumulated manufacturing trade deficits (production shortfalls) of over $3 trillion with full current account trade losses of $4.3 trillion; more than the entire nominal growth of GDP.

    At the same time, now in the third year of their remarkable eleventh Five-Year Development Plan, China's accumulated Current Account surplus soared by nearly $1 trillion since 2001, near 13 percent of GDP in 2007. These surpluses are funding China's now $1.5-trillion war chest of foreign currency reserves.

    Record trade losses have accelerated the hollowing-out of the once dynamic U.S. economy. For the first time on record, in 2002 the United States lost its historic global trade surplus in advanced technology products (ATP). Worsening sharply, since 2004 the ATP deficit became larger than the U.S. trade surplus for intellectual property services, royalties and fees. That is, for the past four years the United States has a worsening combined deficit in technology goods and services. Technology no longer pays any part of the U.S. import bills for oil, cars, electronics and clothing, etc. China now accounts for half the U.S. manufacturing trade deficit and more than the entire deficit in technology.

    Reflecting the production shortfall from the trade deficits, BLS data show output growth since 2001 is among the weakest since the Depression and the gain in total hours worked (just 0.5 percent) is, by far, the weakest. This is why productivity growth has appeared misleadingly healthy; productivity is a measure of output per hour of labor.

    Another powerful measure of the hollowing out in the economy is the radical shift in the job market. Of the 5.92 million total new jobs in the last seven years, only 4.32 million were in the private sector while 1.66 million were in state/local governments, mostly for public education, health and prisons. The federal government cut jobs in the Postal Service.

    More than all of the new jobs added by the private sector since 2001 are in private education and health care bureaucracies (3.34 million new jobs) and in bars and restaurants (1.53 million new jobs.) Uniquely, all net new jobs added fall in the non-supervisory/ production category -- half a million supervisory jobs were lost. Manufacturing lost 3.28 million jobs (19.1 percent) and now provides fewer jobs than in July 1942 -- seven months after the attack on Pearl Harbor.

    Despite concerns about illegal immigration, since 2001 the labor force has grown more slowly (7.4 percent) than during any seven-year period since 1955 and participation rate of those in the labor force -- those working or looking for work -- also fell sharply -- from 67 percent to 66 percent. This is the reason that the unemployment rate, now 5.0 percent, is not much higher.



    The average weekly wage for non-supervisory jobs buys 2.0 percent more now than seven years ago and the average real salary and benefits for all workers is up by 9.0 percent. These real increases are down from the bubble period of the late 1990s but they are far better than the declines of the previous 20 years. Unfortunately, these recent increases in "average" wages appear to be a product of the latest financial bubbles: the widening use of stock options and very large bonuses in compensation, particularly on Wall Street.

    Median real wages have continued to decline, including by 1.4 percent over the past year. Median household real incomes fell 2.0 percent from 2000 to 2006 (latest data available) and even the average income fell 0.5 percent with inequality now the worst on records back to the 1960s. The total current savings of ALL households over the past three years is virtually nothing; by far the worst since 1933.

    The foolishness of powerful, self-interested claims of a "new paradigm" is again exposed. The fantasy is that soaring debt and the loss of production through trade deficits are good things and the lack of current savings irrelevant. As a long forgotten advertisement once proclaimed: "If you don't have yourself an oil well, get one!" We can all live well from royalties and asset appreciation.

    Soaring debt and debt schemes did drive up many asset prices, creating a borrowed illusion of general prosperity along with enormous actual wealth and power for a few. But now, unprecedented debt and soaring inventories of unsold homes are driving down the inflated prices for homes and other assets. For at least the next several years, most households will now be forced to cut spending and earn, not borrow, their living standard.

    Another short-term debt stimulus may take the edge off the difficult economic conditions of the next few months. But trading away our once unique economic strengths while borrowing against the future has failed. Making even minimum interest payments on these massive, soaring debts will be increasingly difficult as the success of thoughtful industrial and trade policies in China and elsewhere continues.

    ___

    Editor's Note: This article recently appeared in Manufacturing and Technology News and we thank Dr. McMillion for giving iTulip permission to publish his important article here. Dr. McMillion details the true costs the average US taxpayer incurs as the US government attempts to preserve the now struggling de-industrialized and financialized US economy for the Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate (FIRE) sector industries maintained by FIRE industry sector subsidies. The FIRE sector supports our government through lobbies, campaign contributions, capital gains tax revenues made possible by asset price inflation monetary policies, and other tax revenues enabled by FIRE sector friendly tax policies.

    Many professional economists work for the FIRE sector, such as for the real estate industry where in the interests of their employers they obfuscated clear economic data to deny the existence of the housing bubble 2002 - 2006, dutifully reported and repeated ad nauseum in the business media at a time when warnings by voices of authority could have helped prevent much of the excess that has led to the hardship that many home owners are experiencing today. Other economists, such as Dr. McMillion, continue to fight for and represent what remains of our nation's once globally dominant industrial economy, including its technology industries. We applaud their efforts. As the US faces its debt deflation deflation crisis, the result of 30 years of FIRE Economy excesses, we hope their time has come and that a new administration in government will seek their guidance on policies to grow the productive sectors of our economy -- including nanotechology, biotechnology, and alternative energy technology -- to re-industrialize the US economy to make it sustainable with minimal dependency on debt and finance for GDP growth, a high national savings rate, more equitable distribution of income and wealth, opportunities for higher education and high wage jobs, and continued open access to capital and markets by US entrepreneurs.


    iTulip Select: The Investment Thesis for the Next Cycle™

    __________________________________________________

    To receive the iTulip Newsletter or iTulip Alerts, Join our FREE Email Mailing List


    Copyright © iTulip, Inc. 1998 - 2007 All Rights Reserved


    All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice.
    Nothing appearing on this website should be considered a recommendation to buy or to sell any security or related financial instrument. iTulip, Inc. is not liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. Full Disclaimer
    Last edited by FRED; 02-10-08 at 07:57 PM.
    Ed.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-14-08, 09:26 PM
  2. NAU, The North American Union...
    By Sapiens in forum Video
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 12-03-07, 12:15 PM
  3. The Real Reason the Soviet Union Collapsed
    By FRED in forum Education and Resources
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-20-07, 08:25 PM
  4. The Big Brother State
    By metalman in forum Video
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-17-07, 01:47 AM

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Opinions expressed herein are those of the posters, not those of iTulip, Inc., its owners, or management. All material posted on this board becomes the intellectual property of the poster and iTulip, Inc., and may not be reposted in full on another website without the express written permission of iTulip, Inc. By exception, the original registered iTulip member who authored a post may repost his or her own material on other sites. Permission is hereby granted to repost brief excerpts of material from this forum on other websites provided that attribution and a link to the source is included with the reposted material.

Nothing on this website is intended or should be construed as investment advice. It is intended to be used for informational and entertainment purposes only. We reserve the right to make changes, including change in price, content, description, terms, etc. at any time without notice. By using this board you agree that you understand the risks of trading, and are solely responsible for your own investment and trading decisions. Read full legal disclaimer.

Journalists are not permitted to contact iTulip members through this forum's email and personal messaging services without written permission from iTulip, Inc. Requests for permission may be made via Contact Us.

Objectionable posts may be reported to the board administrators via Contact Us.

-->