Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Janszen interview on BNN

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    US, Europe and Asia

    Default Janszen interview on BNN

    Eric Janszen is interviewed on BNN by "Squeeze Play" hosts Kevin O'Leary and guest host Paul Waldie about and the housing bubble fallout: recession and the next radical government US economy reflation program.

    Note from EJ on the interview:
    Expect additional concentration of purchasing power in the hands of governments – whether government is buying out of the treasury account, lending short term out of the central bank account, or purchasing out of the Federal budget – to further distort markets. As more of this occurs in response to deteriorating private sector economic performance as the US economy deteriorates due to the debt deflation starting in 2007, political relationships will become more important than market and economic forces in shaping major economic investment decisions.

    We all know that governments are terrible at allocating investment capital, although they are needed to enforce the "rules of the road" so markets can function. The tech and housing bubbles could have been avoided if the SEC had been able to enforce securities law and the housing bubble if the Fed and other regulatory bodies had enforced lending laws and properly regulated credit derivatives. The paradox is that the inevitable response to the failure of governments to fulfill their legitimate role to enforce the rules of the road in markets is to increase their less constructive role of making direct investment in industries better served by private source of funding. To the extent that Sovereign Weath Funds (SWVs) invest in US infrastructure projects that are the traditional realm of government, I'm in favor. In fact, I see Private Public Partnerships (PPPs), while imperfect, as having the potential to improve on the capital-inefficient and tending toward wasteful and corrupt pure government management of infrastructure projects, such as we suffered here recently in The Big Dig. PPPs have the potential to offer the benefits of private corporate oversight, with the rigors of public company project management in terms of transparency and needing to meet obligations to shareholders, while also providing a level of funding that only governments can offer.

    SWFs investing in properly structured PPPs is not ideal – the ideal solution was to not have the credit bubble and economic crash in the first place. But here we are with a lot of debt, an economy going into a prolonged recession, our productive capacity weakened by decades of dependence on the FIRE sector, and there they are will all their "surplus savings" denominated in dollars to put to work and a limited number of places in which to get a return on a level of risk that is lower than a government guaranteed PPP investment.

    Last edited by FRED; 02-07-08 at 11:58 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. Interview of Eric Janszen by Monex
    By FRED in forum Video
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-13-13, 10:36 AM
  2. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 01-28-08, 07:22 PM
  3. Faber Interview 1/11/08
    By Jim Nickerson in forum News
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-12-08, 02:38 PM
  4. Dr. James K. Galbraith Interview - Janszen
    By FRED in forum Interviews
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 01-04-07, 01:37 AM



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Opinions expressed herein are those of the posters, not those of iTulip, Inc., its owners, or management. All material posted on this board becomes the intellectual property of the poster and iTulip, Inc., and may not be reposted in full on another website without the express written permission of iTulip, Inc. By exception, the original registered iTulip member who authored a post may repost his or her own material on other sites. Permission is hereby granted to repost brief excerpts of material from this forum on other websites provided that attribution and a link to the source is included with the reposted material.

Nothing on this website is intended or should be construed as investment advice. It is intended to be used for informational and entertainment purposes only. We reserve the right to make changes, including change in price, content, description, terms, etc. at any time without notice. By using this board you agree that you understand the risks of trading, and are solely responsible for your own investment and trading decisions. Read full legal disclaimer.

Journalists are not permitted to contact iTulip members through this forum's email and personal messaging services without written permission from iTulip, Inc. Requests for permission may be made via Contact Us.

Objectionable posts may be reported to the board administrators via Contact Us.