Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Did JPM & Citi Corner Commodity Derivatives and PMs?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Hades/Arizona
    Posts
    3,788

    Default Did JPM & Citi Corner Commodity Derivatives and PMs?

    Anyone care to comment on these two reports? Given the source, I don't know if they're significant, hyperbole or downright false. I'm trying to understand this stuff better.

    One report says that in Q1 2015, JPM's holdings in the Commodities derivatives markets suddenly climbed to 96%:
    ... based on the OCC's derivative update, JPM had literally cornered the commodity derivatives complex, when from "just" $226 billion in total Commodity exposure, JPM's notional soared by 1,690% in one quarter to $4 trillion, or about 96% of total.

    The other report says that in the same quarter, Citigroup cornered the PM market:
    Here is the chart showing Citigroup's Precious Metals (mostly silver now that gold is lumped in with FX), exposure over the past 4 years. Of note: the 1260% increase in Precious Metals derivative holdings in the past quarter, from just $3.9 billion to $53 billion!

    I'm such an ignoramous when it comes to things like derivatives and currency pegs, and the effect they have on other things. So much data, the significance of which I don't know how to rank in "the big picture." Presentation of data can be manipulated to obscure the truth as much as to elucidate. How can I know what's real and what's false, what's important and what isn't?

    Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

  2. #2
    jk's Avatar
    jk is online now Shadow Fed, iTulip Select Member, The Brain
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    10,346

    Default Re: Did JPM & Citi Corner Commodity Derivatives and PMs?

    for me the most interesting phrase in those reports was: "..now that gold is lumped in with FX."

    re your question, i can't give you any concrete information as a few years ago i stopped spending as much time on inside baseball, but for at least a decade there have been articles about the trillions of derivatives exposure of the big banks. the banks always say that they're just carrying offsetting exposures or hedges for their clients and that their own exposure nets near zero. that's what they say.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Hades/Arizona
    Posts
    3,788

    Default Re: Did JPM & Citi Corner Commodity Derivatives and PMs?

    Quote Originally Posted by jk View Post
    for me the most interesting phrase in those reports was: "..now that gold is lumped in with FX."

    re your question, i can't give you any concrete information as a few years ago i stopped spending as much time on inside baseball, but for at least a decade there have been articles about the trillions of derivatives exposure of the big banks. the banks always say that they're just carrying offsetting exposures or hedges for their clients and that their own exposure nets near zero. that's what they say.
    Wish I knew what the big jump means, if anything.

    Putting gold in with FX surprised me as well. I don't know if you followed this link from the article, but here's more about it from Perth Mint:
    Mea culpa on OCC derivatives Posted by Bron Suchecki at 9:05 am Derivatives
    Jul 022015
    On Tuesday I posted on the latest US Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (OCC) quarterly report and how it showed a reduction in total precious metal derivatives. I took Zero Hedge to task for jumping the gun on posting before seeking further information but now I have to admit I was guilty of that myself, the result being I was wrong to claim of a 29% reduction in precious metal derivatives.

    Zero Hedge and I both made the same mistake, which was to assume that “precious metals” in Table 9 of the OCC’s report included gold, which I think is a reasonable assumption as “precious metals” is commonly understood to mean gold, silver, platinum and palladium. The OCC confirmed to me by email that Table 9 excludes gold and gave me a snapshot of a section of the call report where, at least to the banks filling out the form, it is clearly identified that the “precious metal” category should exclude gold.

    The OCC did agree to my suggestion to footnote Table 9 to clarify that the precious metals notional does not include gold but did not answer my question as to why gold was now included with FX, simply stating that “banks began reporting combined FX and Gold notionals because of changes to the call report, specifically schedule RC-R that require the two be categorized together”.

    Since the Perth Mint is not a bank and doesn’t deal in these sort of risky derivatives, I have no insight into the reason for such a bureaucratic form change. My best guess is that it has something to do with Basel II and changes to “harmonize the [US] agencies’ rules for calculating risk-weighted assets to enhance risk sensitivity and address weaknesses identified over recent years”. A look at this notice of proposed rulemaking (the new rules started in Q1 2015) shows that Gold and FX are grouped together with the same derivative contract conversion factors (see below from page 196) – note also that the column names match exactly the reporting categories in Tables 8, 9, 10 and 11 of the OCC derivatives report. So we can blame the Basel bureaucrats for decreased transparency in gold market.


    A small mercy is that we still have a continuing dataset for the white PMs (ie silver, platinum and palladium). Zero Hedge noted the 237% increase in this category, which is certainly unusual for these markets which are smaller and often less liquid than gold. A comparison of the Q4 and Q1 OCC reports reveals that 92% of the $53.1 billion increase in the notional value of white PM derivatives was attributable to Citibank, who increased from $3.9b to $53.0b.

    In an email response to Nick Laird of Sharelynx.com who questioned this dramatic change, the OCC confirmed the figures were correct and provided the following screenshot of Citibank’s schedule RC-R as proof.

    This reveals that almost all of the increase was in Citibank’s centrally cleared derivative contracts (circled in red) rather than in OTC markets (in green), which total $3,786m, very close to Citibank’s Q4 figure of $3,901m. That does make me wonder if the red figures are a fat finger and belong in a different row.

    Bloomberg note that “Citigroup has been expanding in derivatives as it rebuilds trading businesses that suffered after the financial crisis led the firm to take a government bailout” and that it has “pursued a risk-managed expansion off of a low base to bring the firm in line with competitors” so maybe Citibank has been active in the white metals as part of this “rebuilding”. If that is the case, then it is possible that they have been doing the same in gold.

    This then leads to the question of whether we can estimate the value of gold derivatives for Q1 2015 based on historical relationships between the gold, the white PMs and FX figures. The chart below shows the notional value of gold derivatives against three other OCC report figures.

    Gold has been declining in relative terms over the past 15 years, but the last few years are more stable. If we take the average of the last two years for each of these relationships, then the estimated gold derivative notional value in dollars and tonnes would be:

    Gold as 0.045% of Total Derivatives = $91,360m (or 2,394 tonnes, red star)
    Gold as 0.433% of Gold+FX = $137,491m (or 3,602 tonnes, green star)
    Gold as 3.644 times White PMs = $275,531m (or 7,219 tonnes, orange star)

    To put those estimate figures into context, I’ve shown them as stars on Nick’s gold derivatives in notional tonnes chart below.

    I think the red and green are realistic probabilities but the orange 7,219 tonne figure, based on the large Citibank white PM’s Q1 figure, just does not seem possible given there was no commensurate response in the gold price. This leads me to think that Citibank has only been active in the white PMs and it is not correct to extrapolate this action out to gold.

    As to Citibank having a notional $53 billion worth of white PMs derivatives on their books, industry sources tell me that “Citibank are not that active in PGMs so if the figure is real, it would have to be silver and it would have to be something very unusual.” I have an email in to my precious metals contact at Citibank but he is on leave at the moment so no response at the time of this post. I’m not expecting a comment as Citibank declined to comment on the OCC report to Bloomberg, but I’ll post any update/explanation if I get it.

    Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-21-11, 04:05 PM
  2. Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-21-10, 02:34 PM
  3. AsiaTimes: Fed is Painted Into a Corner
    By reggie in forum News
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-17-10, 12:39 AM
  4. Citi ATM Fees 300% Of Citi's Share Price (C)
    By petertribo in forum News
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-09-09, 07:47 PM
  5. Stagflation may be just around the corner
    By EJ in forum iTulip News with AntiSpin
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-10-07, 11:03 PM

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Opinions expressed herein are those of the posters, not those of iTulip, Inc., its owners, or management. All material posted on this board becomes the intellectual property of the poster and iTulip, Inc., and may not be reposted in full on another website without the express written permission of iTulip, Inc. By exception, the original registered iTulip member who authored a post may repost his or her own material on other sites. Permission is hereby granted to repost brief excerpts of material from this forum on other websites provided that attribution and a link to the source is included with the reposted material.

Nothing on this website is intended or should be construed as investment advice. It is intended to be used for informational and entertainment purposes only. We reserve the right to make changes, including change in price, content, description, terms, etc. at any time without notice. By using this board you agree that you understand the risks of trading, and are solely responsible for your own investment and trading decisions. Read full legal disclaimer.

Journalists are not permitted to contact iTulip members through this forum's email and personal messaging services without written permission from iTulip, Inc. Requests for permission may be made via Contact Us.

Objectionable posts may be reported to the board administrators via Contact Us.

-->