Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

P C Roberts Bets on Collapse

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • P C Roberts Bets on Collapse

    Recovery or Collapse? Bet on Collapse

    May 20, 2012 |



    The US financial system and, probably, the financial system of Europe, no longer serves a useful social purpose.


    The cost to society of the private financial system is even higher. Rob Urie reports that two years ago Andrew Haldane, executive Director for Financial Stability at the Bank of England (the UK’s version of the Federal Reserve) said that the financial crisis, now four years old, will in the end cost the world economy between $60 trillion and $200 trillion in lost GDP. If Urie’s report is correct, this is an astonishing admission from a member of the ruling elite.

    Try to get your mind around these figures. The US GDP, the largest in the world, is about 15 trillion. What Haldane is telling us is that the financial crisis will end up costing the world lost real income between 4 and 13 times the size of the current Gross Domestic Product of the United States. This could turn out to be an optimistic forecast.
    In the end, the financial crisis could destroy Western civilization.



    Even if Urie’s report, or Haldane’s calculation, is incorrect, the obvious large economic loss from the financial crisis is still unprecedented. The enormous cost of the financial crisis has one single source–financial deregulation. Financial deregulation is likely to prove to be the mistake that destroys Western civilization. While we quake in our boots from fear of “Muslim terrorists,” it is financial deregulation that is destroying us, with help from jobs offshoring. Keep in mind that Haldane is a member of the ruling elite, not a critic of the system like myself, Gerald Celente, Michael Hudson, Pam Martins, and Nomi Prins. (This is not meant to be an exhaustive list of critics.)


    Financial deregulation has had dangerous and adverse consequences. Deregulation permitted financial concentration that produced “banks too big to fail,” thus requiring the general public to absorb the costs of the banks’ mistakes and reckless gambling.



    Deregulation permitted banks to leverage a small amount of capital with enormous debt in order to maximize return on equity, thereby maximizing the instability of the financial system and the cost to society of the banks’ bad bets.



    Deregulation allowed financial institutions to sweep aside the position limits on speculators and to dominate commodity markets, turning them into a gambling casino and driving up the prices of energy and food.
    Deregulation permits financial institutions to sell naked shorts, which means to sell a company’s stock or gold and silver bullion that the seller does not possess into the market in order to drive down the price. http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/accidentally-released-and-incredibly-embarrassing-documents-show-how-goldman-et-al-engaged-in-naked-short-selling-20120515



    The informed reader can add more items to this list.


    The dollar in its role as world reserve currency is the source of Washington’s power. It allows Washington to control the international payments system and to exclude from the financial system those countries that do not do Washington’s bidding. It allows Washington to print money with which to pay its bills and to purchase the cooperation of foreign governments or to fund opposition within those countries whose governments Washington is unable to purchase, such as Iran, Russia, and China. If the dollar was not the world reserve currency and actually reflected its true depreciated value from the mounting US debt and running of the printing press, Washington’s power would be dramatically curtailed.


    The US dollar has come close to its demise several times recently. In 2011 the dollar’s value fell as low as 72 Swiss cents. Investors seeking safety for the value of their money flooded into Swiss francs, pushing the value of the franc so high that Switzerland’s exports began to suffer. The Swiss government responded to the inflow of dollars and euros seeking refuge in the franc by declaring that it would in the future print new francs to offset the inflows of foreign currency in order to prevent the rise in the value of the franc. In other words, currency flight from the US and Europe forced the Swiss to inflate in order to prevent the continuous rise in the exchange value of the Swiss currency.


    Prior to the sovereign debt crisis in Europe, the dollar was also faced with a run-up in the value of the euro as foreign central banks and OPEC members shifted their reserves into euros from dollars. The euro was on its way to becoming an alternative reserve currency. However, Goldman Sachs, whose former employees dominate the US Treasury and financial regulatory agencies and also the European Central Bank and governments of Italy and, indirectly, Greece, helped the Greek government to disguise its true deficit, thus deceiving the private European banks who were purchasing the bonds of the Greek government. Once the European sovereign debt crisis was launched, Washington had an interest in keeping it going, as it sends holders of euros fleeing into “safe” dollars, thus boosting the exchange value of the dollar, despite the enormous rise in Washington’s own debt and the doubling of the US money supply.


    Last year gold and silver were rapidly rising in price (measured in US dollars), with gold hitting $1,900 an ounce and on its way to $2,000 when suddenly short sales began dominating the bullion markets. The naked shorts of gold and silver bullion succeeded in driving the price of gold down $350 per ounce from its peak. Many informed observers believe that the reason Washington has not prosecuted the banksters for their known financial crimes is that the banksters serve as an auxiliary to Washington by protecting the value of the dollar by shorting bullion and rival currencies.



    What happens if Greece exits the EU on its own or by the German boot? What happens if the other EU members reject German Chancellor Merkel’s austerity, as the new president of France promised to do? If Europe breaks apart, do more investors flee to the doomed US dollar?


    Will a dollar bubble become the largest bubble in economic history?


    When the dollar goes, interest rates will escalate, and bond prices will collapse. Everyone who sought safety in US Treasuries will be wiped out.

    We should all be aware that such outcomes are not part of the public debate.



    Recently Bill Moyers interviewed Simon Johnson, formerly chief economist of the International Monetary Fund and currently professor at MIT. It turns out that deregulation, which abolished the separation of investment banks from commercial banks, permitted Jamie Dimon’s JPMorganChase to gamble with federally insured deposits. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article31356.htm Despite this, Moyers reports that Republicans remain determined to kill the weak Dodd-Frank law and restore full deregulation.


    Simon Johnson says: “I think it [deregulation] is a recipe for disaster.” The problem is, Johnson says, that correct economic policy is blocked by the enormous donations banks make to political campaigns. This means Wall Street’s attitudes and faulty risk models will result in an even bigger financial crisis than the one from which we are still suffering. And it will happen prior to recovery from the current crisis.


    Johnson warns that the Republicans will distract everyone from the real crisis by concocting another “crisis” over the debt ceiling.



    Johnson says that “a few people, particularly in and around the financial system, have become too powerful. They were allowed to take a lot of risk, and they did massive damage to the economy — more than eight million jobs lost. We’re still struggling to get back anywhere close to employment levels where we were before 2008. And they’ve done massive damage to the budget. This damage to the budget is long lasting; it undermines the budget when we need it to be stronger because the society is aging. We need to support Social Security and support Medicare on a fair basis. We need to restore and rebuild revenue, revenue that was absolutely devastated by the financial crisis. People need to understand the link between what the banks did and the budget. And too many people fail to do that.”


    Consequently, Johnson says, the banksters continue to receive mega-benefits while imposing enormous social costs on society.


    Few Americans and no Washington policymakers understand the dire situation. They are too busy hyping a non-existent recovery and the next war. Statistician John Williams reports that when correctly measured as a cost of living indicator, which the CPI no longer is, the current inflation rate in the US is 5 to 7 percentage points higher than the officially reported rate, as every consumer knows. The unemployment rate falls because, and only because, people unable to find jobs drop out of the labor force and are no longer counted as unemployed. Every informed person knows that the official inflation and unemployment rates are fictions; yet, the presstitute media continue to report the rates with a straight face as fact.



    The way the government has rigged the measure of unemployment, it is possible for the US to have a zero rate of unemployment and not a single person employed or in the work force.


    The way the government has the measure of inflation rigged, it is possible for your living standing to fall while the government reports that you are better off.


    Financial deregulation raises the returns from speculative schemes above the returns from productive activity. The highly leveraged debt and derivatives that gave us the financial crisis have nothing to do with financing businesses. The banks are not only risking their customers’ deposits on gambling bets but also jeopardizing the country’s financial stability and economic future.


    With an eye on the approaching dollar crisis, which will wreck the international financial system, the presidents of China, Russia, Brazil, South Africa, and the prime minister of India met last month to discuss forming a new bank that would shield their economies and commerce from mistakes made by Washington and the European Union. The five countries, known as the BRICS, intend to settle their trade with one another in their own currencies and cease relying on the dollar. The fact that Russia, the two Asian giants, and the largest economies in Africa and South America are leaving the dollar’s orbit sends a powerful message of lack of confidence in Washington’s handling of financial matters.



    It is ironic that the outcome of financial deregulation in the US is the opposite of what its free market advocates promised. In place of highly competitive financial firms that live or die by their wits alone without government intervention, we have unprecedented financial concentration. Massive banks, “too big to fail,” now send their multi-trillion dollar losses to Washington to be paid by heavily indebted US taxpayers whose real incomes have not risen in 20 years. The banksters take home fortunes in annual bonuses for their success in socializing the “free market” banks’ losses and privatizing profits to the point of not even paying income taxes.



    In the US free market economists unleashed avarice and permitted it to run amuck. Will the disastrous consequences discredit capitalism to the extent that the Soviet collapse discredited socialism?



    Will Western civilization itself survive the financial tsunami that deregulated Wall Street has produced?


    Ironic, isn’t it, that the United States, the home of the “indispensable people,” stands before us as the likely candidate whose government will be responsible for the collapse of the West.




    Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate.



  • #2
    Re: P C Roberts Bets on Collapse

    "The enormous cost of the financial crisis has one single source–financial deregulation."

    Wrong. 100% wrong.

    The primary cause of the financial crisis is the epic moral hazard that developed over decades when the role of government was expanded to include protecting people from financial loss via government guarantees, bailouts, FDIC insurance, auto bailouts, Fannie/Freddie bailouts, etc. Anyone with a basic understanding of economics and free markets knows that when you remove the naturally-occurring penalties for stupid business decisions, you get a whole lot more risk-taking.

    The second major cause was the role of the government being expanded to include ensuring that low-income people (who had no business buying a house) could buy a house using loan money that government made available via Fannie and Freddie and loan guarantees. This drove the price of houses up to an unrealistic level from which they predictably crashed, causing the whole subprime crisis.

    The third major cause was the Federal Reserve and its power to try to "centrally plan" the proper interest rate and to print money. Without the Fed making money artificially cheap to borrow, the house prices could not have gone so high because people could not have afforded the mortgages.

    The fourth major cause is human nature and the unavoidable generational pattern of younger generations forgetting the hard-learned lessons of previous generations. "It's different this time", "house prices never go down", etc. No regulation could have remedied this, because when a new generation comes along that has no living memory of the hard lessons of the past, they will revoke the regulations of the past generations, seeing no need for them.

    So, deregulation had nothing to do with this crisis, although those who devoutly believe that the government SHOULD be protecting us from financial losses and SHOULD be providing loans to people who can't afford them and SHOULD be solving all of our problems, and who do not believe the free market can be trusted, would like us to believe that if only there was enough regulation of the right type, all of that moral hazard and bubble-inducing subsidy would have been manageable. It is not.

    That is the great failure of the liberal/socialist mindset. They remain convinced that if you just let the smart liberal/socialist Keynesians run things and put enough regulation in place, they can make socialism work without the problems of moral hazard. They keep failing and we keep having to pay the price over and over and over again. And every time they fail, they angrily accuse those who believe in free markets of causing the problem by not letting them put on more regulation. They always identify the problem as a lack of enough regulation.

    But without government interference in the market, house prices would never have gotten so high, so many people without the means to pay would not have been able to get mortgages, investors and bankers would not have taken so many risks, and the bubble (small versions of which are unavoidable because of human nature) would never have developed to civilization-threatening levels.

    This problem was caused by those who place their faith in the ability of the government to perfect society through government manipulation of the free market.
    Last edited by Mn_Mark; May 22, 2012, 10:54 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: P C Roberts Bets on Collapse

      Mi opinion is that all the chatter about the catastrophic possible outcomes of the Greek-Eurozone crisis is only an extortion to force European people to accept the two objectives of the powerful in Europe: the destruction of the welfare state and privatization of public services and industrial companies. The ways to avoid any such catastrophe are simple and at hand: money printing by the European Central Bank. Any legal constraints to such massive money printing would be easily overcome.
      So, when the things get really bad they print until the worst is avoided. And more austerity and privatizations are imposed. So, a new cycle begins.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: P C Roberts Bets on Collapse

        And the repeal of Glass-Steagall? The passing into law of The Commodities Futures Modernization Act?

        Look, for all I care they could do away with the GSE's entirely and I wouldn't care a hoot. Other countries do fine without these things and we could too. Same for CRA and a few other right wing Bogey men... but in the end these are merely window dressing. They had the effect of amplifying the bubble a bit around the edges but had little to do with blowing the bubbles.

        You can check out the actual numbers of mortgage failures held by the GSEs and compare that to that of private label loans. Or you can actually check out what a miniscule percentage of private label loans were eligible for CRA credit. Or you can see how much private label ilk was bought up by the GSEs and the central bank to save the banks. Any of these things will let you know loud and clear where the problems arose at.

        Securitization allowed the banks to make tons of money assembling MBS and pawning them off. It is a system where banks can get rich off of a product that allows them to disown a lot of the risk. The CDS system allowed them to threaten, with a lot of believability, that they could blow up the financial system. These are the roots of the housing bubble and the financial crisis. The trade deficit was the fertilizer that provided the dollar recycling racket needed for cash flow.

        If you'll allow a suggestion, I'd advise forgetting about right vs left and conservative vs liberal. Believe me when I tell you that the origins of the FIRE economy do not follow these old denominations. As long as you are in the trap of this mindset you'll never 'get' the cause of the crisis. Never.

        At least IMvHO.

        Will

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: P C Roberts Bets on Collapse

          How do you explain the housing bubbles in other countries? I assume Fannie/Freddie did that too?

          How do you explain the relatively good economic growth throughout the many years, prior to deregulation?

          Fannie and Freddie insure small, inexpensive homes. How do you explain the bubble in all housing?

          So, deregulation had nothing to do with this crisis,
          --> Did it have everything to do with it? No. Did it have a lot to do with it? Hell yes.

          In the end, just look at who has benefited the most over the past 20 years and who has lost the most. There, you will find where the blame lies.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: P C Roberts Bets on Collapse

            This kind of black and white thinking is symptomatic of the serious chalenges we face as a country. "100% wrong" is 100% wrong. How about using a little critical thinking? It was common knowledge that the ability to sell mortgages to investors led to the bank or mortgage lender having no responsibility for losses, and led to all sorts of fraud, not just targeting unsophisticated low income people but also large pension funds, investors and banks across the US and Europe.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: P C Roberts Bets on Collapse

              There's also the missing point about how the 'expanded Federal government' led to decreased fraud monitoring/enforcement and bank supervision.

              How exactly did the 'moral hazard' mentioned play into the utter lack of criminal investigation and prosecution? And who was the moral hazard on?

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: P C Roberts Bets on Collapse

                A liberal friend said: Who's fault is it? Everyones!


                Financial institutiuons,governments, consumers, journalists, etc.; were all responsible for greed, stupidity, and not being careful.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: P C Roberts Bets on Collapse

                  Originally posted by vt View Post
                  A liberal friend said: Who's fault is it? Everyones!


                  Financial institutiuons,governments, consumers, journalists, etc.; were all responsible for greed, stupidity, and not being careful.

                  Yes.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: P C Roberts Bets on Collapse

                    Might some possible causes for this Great Recession, especially in America be: a.) the Cold War deficit-spending, for decades and to achieve absolutely nothing; b.) the stupidity of JFK and LBJ in creating the Vietnam War and its spending, year-after-year for absolutely nothing; c.) the Federal Reserve Bank and its insistence upon keeping lending rates below the rate of inflation, forever; d.) the green energy folly, now forcing energy costs and inflation up; e.) city planners increasing housing density and driving up land and housing prices, needlessly;
                    f.) the special needs of the baby-boom (population bulge) generation for education, then jobs, then affordable housing, interest income, complete medicare for everyone at all ages, social security, and pension income; g.) the collapse of the industrial base of America ( in the Rust-Belt ); h.) the long-term failure of Keynesian economics; i.) the lack of planning for people, instead of the environment;
                    j.) inflation and the failure by the Fed to address it; k.) deficit spending; l.) punishing savers; m.) the policies of trickle-up economics and the Repukes?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: P C Roberts Bets on Collapse

                      Originally posted by vt View Post
                      A liberal friend said: Who's fault is it? Everyones!


                      Financial institutiuons,governments, consumers, journalists, etc.; were all responsible for greed, stupidity, and not being careful.
                      Yes, the American Citizen, who is now called the American Consumer. Decades of people re-electing the most venal slimebags, as long as those slimebags promise them more slop at the trough. How far we have fallen.

                      Edit: Reading my own post, I realize it isn't very kind. Oh, well.

                      Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: P C Roberts Bets on Collapse

                        I remember the days of Arthur Burns running the Fed:

                        "Five-percent down for our new homes this week-end. Nothing down to vets. Buy a new home this week-end with a 4.50 % mortgage and payments as low as $99 per month. Melody Homes on Alum Rock Road, San Jose. See you this Sunday.... Free balloons and hot-dogs for the kiddies!"

                        This is how it was in the 1960s in San Jose. This was Silicon Valley before the computer revolution.... This was inflation on-the-make with Arthur Burns running the Federal Reserve Bank in Washington.

                        Enjoy the Great Recession now because it began with insane economic policies from the Federal Reserve Bank, and it also began with endless spending for the Cold War and for the ridiculous Vietnam War cultivated, by JFK and LBJ, the so-called, "liberals" in Washington.

                        Meanwhile, the silver dollars began to disappear from the banks, and the Federal Reserve kept printing money.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X