Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Banksters here, banksters there, banksters everywhere: suicides due to micro-finance

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Banksters here, banksters there, banksters everywhere: suicides due to micro-finance

    Does make one wonder about the role banksters played in awarding the Nobel Prize to the person who popularized this...

    Several points of note:

    24% to 30% is apparently fine because 'usurious moneylenders' charge more.

    Poor people actually care about defaulting on loans.

    The historical links are equally amusing at the end of this article.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-11997571

    India has 30 million households who have accessed micro-loans

    In his grotty, two-room brick home, all that remains of Ketadi Ramchandra Moorthy is a laminated colour photograph sitting on the cold cement floor.

    Two months ago, the 40-year-old carpenter dropped dead after a heart attack at a bus station in Hyderabad, some 70km (43 miles) away from his rural home in the south-east Indian state of Andhra Pradesh.

    He had travelled to the city to beg friends for cash to pay loans he had taken over the course of a year from private micro-credit firms.

    A broken man, he had been heading back empty-handed to Gajwel village in Medak district.

    A government report said Mr Moorthy had suffered a heart attack "due to pressure put by the micro-finance institutions for repayment".

    Ketadi Ramachandra Moorthy's family is struggling in debt

    "He was so stressed out that he just collapsed and died," says his wife, K Karuna, 36.

    More than a third of the 30 million households that have taken micro-credit in India live in Andhra Pradesh. The majority of the borrowers are women.

    Borrowers' revolt

    But the small loan has turned out to be a big curse for many in the state.
    More than 80 people have taken their own lives in the last few months after defaulting on micro-loans, according to the government.

    This has triggered the worst ever crisis in India's booming micro-finance industry.
    Scenting votes, opposition politicians have encouraged borrowers to halt repayments - micro-finance companies have given out 80bn rupees ($2bn; £1.3bn) of loans in Andhra Pradesh.

    Banks, in turn, have stopped lending to micro-finance companies and fear they may not recover some $4bn in loans.

    "Multiple lending, over-indebtedness, coercive recovery practices and unseemly enrichment by promoters and senior executives [of micro-credit companies] has led to this situation," says Vijay Mahajan, chairman of India's Microfinance Institutions Network.

    India's micro-finance crisis mirrors the 2008 subprime mortgage meltdown in the US, where finance companies threw cheap and easy loans at homebuyers until prices crashed and borrowers were unable to sell their homes or pay their debts.
    But the difference in India is that the borrowers are even poorer, with zero social security.

    Mr Moorthy's story is a tragic example of how micro-loans - annual interest rates vary from 24-30%, compared with the 36%-120% charged by usurious money lenders - can lead impoverished, ill-educated people to ruin.


    This defeats the supposed purpose of micro-credit, with all its talk about improving the lives of the poor.

    In 2002, Mr Moorthy took a loan worth $350 from a micro-credit company to build his $2,210 home.

    Half of the money came via an interest-free loan his wife - who rolls tobacco leaves for a living - took from her employers.

    A moneylender chipped in another loan worth $440 that is yet to be repaid.

    Ultimate price

    In May 2008, micro-credit salesmen descended in droves on Mr Moorthy's village and he took a second loan worth $330 to pay off small debts to his neighbours.

    This second loan, the family say, was paid off within a year.

    Terms and perdition may apply: The government is seeking to regulate microfinance companies

    Undeterred by the debt trap he was falling into, and persuaded by aggressive micro-credit agents, Mr Moorthy borrowed $660 in three loans from as many companies.

    These were to pay for the education of his three children, including a college-going son, and, again, to repay previous debt.

    When he died in October, he had been defaulting on the latter three loans for up to 20 weeks.

    Mr Moorthy's monthly earnings, say his family, usually never exceeded $110.
    "Loans have been given to rural people without checking whether they had the capacity to repay," says Reddy Subrahmanyam, the state's most senior rural development official.

    The government estimates families that have taken micro-loans in Andhra Pradesh have an average debt of $660, and an average annual income of $1,060.

    This means more than 60% of their fragile, uncertain income is being spent paying off loans.

    Two months after his death, Mr Moorthy's family struggles to survive, pawning jewellery and depending on the generosity of caring neighbours and vote-seeking politicians.

    The eldest son, K Ramanachari has had to give up the college education that cost his father so much.

    The 19-year-old has found a job ferrying tobacco leaves on baskets once a week, earning about 100 rupees ($2.2) for a day's work.

    Mrs Karuna rolls tobacco leaves during the day and then, if she is lucky, finds farmwork in the evenings.

    All this fetches her less than $3 on a good day.

    She pawned her silver and gold jewellery, worth nearly $200, to keep a roof over her children's heads and send them to school.

    Appendicitis to suicide

    Two leading politicians, including the state's main opposition leader Chandrababu Naidu, have lent her $1,100, which she plans to deposit in a bank.

    Mylaram Kallava defaulted on loans taken for her daughter's treatment

    "Big or small, loans kill. I will never take up another loan," says Mrs Karuna.
    Sometimes a loan taken to save a life can end up taking a life in the debt-stricken villages of Andhra Pradesh.

    Mylaram Kallava, 45, hanged herself from the ceiling of her mud hut in the neighbouring village of Ghanapur after she defaulted on four micro-loans amounting to $840.

    The loans were taken to pay for medical treatment for her 17-year-old daughter's appendicitis and her eldest daughter's pregnancy, which ended in a miscarriage.

    The nearest government hospitals were more than 70km (45 miles) away, forcing Mrs Kallava to seek private treatment which was well beyond her means.

    The three loans were taken in July last year - Mrs Kallava was in default for just two months when she killed herself.

    It did not help that her grave-digger husband, Narsimhulu, 55, was in poor health and found work only now and then.

    The federal jobs-for-work programme in the village stopped in August, leading to an acute shortage of employment in the area, locals say.

    "I could feel that my mother's tension was building up when she began defaulting," says her daughter, Sangeeta. "She was unable to get work.
    "Her co-guarantors in the group came to the house and asked her to explain. I think she felt ashamed."

    For seven days before she took her life one weekday evening, Mrs Kallava had been unable to find any work.

    The micro-loan recovery agents were due to come knocking by the end of that week.

    She did not wait for them.

    This is the first in a two-part series by Soutik Biswas on the micro-credit industry in India.

    More on This Story

    Related Stories



  • #2
    Re: Banksters here, banksters there, banksters everywhere: suicides due to micro-finance

    Originally posted by c1ue View Post
    Does make one wonder about the role banksters played in awarding the Nobel Prize to the person who popularized this...

    ....

    tell me...please... that it wasnt krugman?

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Banksters here, banksters there, banksters everywhere: suicides due to micro-finance

      Originally posted by lektrode
      tell me...please... that it wasnt krugman?
      No, while the Nobel Prize for Economics these days seems to attract more than its share of failed future hedge fund managers, the Nobel Prize referred to above is one of the only ones with an even worse track record than Economics:

      The Nobel Peace Prize for 2006, awarded to Mohammed Yunus and Grameen bank for micro-loans:

      http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_priz...aureates/2006/

      Yunus can now join such worthy winners as Barack Obama (2009), the IPCC for climate change (2007), Menachem Begin (1978), and Henry Kissinger (1973).

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Banksters here, banksters there, banksters everywhere: suicides due to micro-finance

        I've tried to read about Mohammed Yunus especially after he was forced to "retire." My impression, probably naive, is that he set out to do something good. Grameen's micro loans were at flat rates usually from 10 to 18 percent. Mostly to women, almost all paid back. Now most micro loans are offered by other banks trying to get in on the action with more attention to shareholders than fighting poverty. Yunus is clearly in politics whether he wanted to be or not. Never found an in depth article that could explain what was going on.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Banksters here, banksters there, banksters everywhere: suicides due to micro-finance

          As far as I understand micro-finance could only ever work on a-not-for-profit basis (which, for what it's worth was the only model Yunus put forward as far as I recall.) The loans are just far too small relative to the servicing costs for it ever to make sense.

          I wasn't aware that micro-finance had "blossomed" into a for-profit business. You could have predicted the tragedies described here just based on that. It was never going to work and if it appeared to, it was a mirage that someone was profiting from mightily.

          But that does not condemn micro-finance on a not for profit basis as far as I can see.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Banksters here, banksters there, banksters everywhere: suicides due to micro-finance

            After taking another look around, it seems the debate is still raging, and that a definitive article on Yunus is hard to find. Notes: He began microfinancing in '76 thirty years before the prize. His dismissal was upheld by the supreme court a month ago. He is asking for a review.


            “In Latin America, lenders have been accused of charging usurious rates, prompting repayment strikes.
            In India, government regulators in the state of Andhra Pradesh cracked down on the industry after a spate of suicides that they claimed had been caused by strong-arm collection tactics and overindebtedness by microfinance customers.
            “It is certainly a sign of the bad times for the microfinance sector as a whole,” said Vijay Mahajan, who heads Basix, an Indian lender. “In country after country, what was considered a very useful and hopeful thing for poor people — and indeed financially sustainable — is now being reviled as something that is either exploitative or worse.”
            http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/03/wo...a/03yunus.html



            “Microfinance Pioneer Prof. Muhammad Yunus has long been critical of the for-profit microfinance institutions. In a recent interview with Microfinance Focus, Prof. Yunus stated that commercial programmes should not be allowed to use the terms ‘microcredit’ or ‘microfinance’.
            “On many occasions problems created by commercial credit programmes are imputed to microcredit programmes. This creates a bad image for the microcredit programmes”, he said.

            In response to his remarks, P N Vasudevan, Promoter and Managing Director of Chennai based Equitas Micro Finance India, said that microfinance institutions should not be judged by the constitution of their formation but by what they do to their clients.

            “And for every for-profit MFI which is known to be usurious in lending rates and greedy in profiteering, there are equal number of NGO-MFIs which are corrupt and carry out any number of mal-practices cheating their clients. *And so too, for every good and ethical NGO, there are equally good and honest NBFC-MFIs too”, Vasudevan said.”

            http://www.microfinancefocus.com/mff...tion-vasudevan

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Banksters here, banksters there, banksters everywhere: suicides due to micro-finance

              There is a reason usury was considered a crime by many cultures for centuries. There is difference between business debt and personal debt too, although many don't see it.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Banksters here, banksters there, banksters everywhere: suicides due to micro-finance

                Originally posted by oddlots
                As far as I understand micro-finance could only ever work on a-not-for-profit basis (which, for what it's worth was the only model Yunus put forward as far as I recall.) The loans are just far too small relative to the servicing costs for it ever to make sense.

                I wasn't aware that micro-finance had "blossomed" into a for-profit business. You could have predicted the tragedies described here just based on that. It was never going to work and if it appeared to, it was a mirage that someone was profiting from mightily.

                But that does not condemn micro-finance on a not for profit basis as far as I can see.
                What are the differences in interest rates between a non-profit and a for-profit?

                Secondly why are the servicing costs a barrier, when they can be factored into the interest rate (and are, even for non-profits)?

                Lastly why do you think that micro-finance for profit cannot generate profits?

                The large numbers above speak only to what banks think they might not recover. Actual overall volume is estimate to be around $38 billion worldwide, with likely a significant chunk in India alone. At interest rates of 24% to 30%, even low double digit default rates are very profitable.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Banksters here, banksters there, banksters everywhere: suicides due to micro-finance

                  Don't fall for the trap.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Banksters here, banksters there, banksters everywhere: suicides due to micro-finance

                    An alternat model exists

                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&f...&v=q3YHd9e4Q2A

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Banksters here, banksters there, banksters everywhere: suicides due to micro-finance

                      Niall Ferguson loved them in his movie "ascent of money"

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X