Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

US-Iran economic war

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • US-Iran economic war

    http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/NA07Ak01.html

    The US-Iran economic war
    By Pepe Escobar

    NEW YORK - Here's a crash course on how to further wreck the global economy.

    A key amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act signed by United States President Barack Obama on the last day of 2011 - when no one was paying attention - imposes sanctions on any countries or companies that buy Iranian oil and pay for it through Iran's central bank. Starting this summer, anybody who does it is prevented from doing business with the US.

    This amendment - for all practical purposes a declaration of economic war - was brought to you by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), on direct orders of the Israeli government under Prime Minister Benjamin "Bibi" Netanyahu.

    Torrents of spin have tried to rationalize it as the Obama administration's plan B as opposed to letting the Israeli dogs of war conduct an unilateral attack on Iran over its supposed nuclear weapons program.

    Yet the original Israeli strategy was in fact even more hysterical - as in effectively preventing any country or company from paying for imported Iranian oil, with the possible exceptions of China and India. On top of it, American Israel-firsters were trying to convince anyone this would not result in relentless oil price hikes.

    Once again displaying a matchless capacity to shoot themselves in their Ferragamo-clad feet, governments in the European Union (EU) are debating whether or not to buy oil from Iran anymore. The existential doubt is should we start now or wait for a few months. Inevitably, like death and taxes, the result has been - what else - oil prices soaring. Brent crude is now hovering around $114, and the only way is up.

    Get me to the crude on time
    Iran is the second-largest Organization for Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) producer, exporting up to 2.5 million barrels of oil a day. Around 450,000 of these barrels go to the European Union - the second-largest market for Iran after China.

    The requisite faceless bureaucrat, EU Energy Commissioner Gunther Ottinger, has been spinning that the EU can count on Saudi Arabia to make up the shortfall from Iran.

    Any self-respecting oil analyst knows Saudi Arabia does not have all the necessary extra spare capacity. Moreover, and crucially, Saudi Arabia needs to make a lot of money out of expensive oil. After all, the counter-revolutionary House of Saud badly needs these funds to bribe its subjects into dismissing any possibility of an indigenous Arab Spring.

    Add to it Tehran's threat to block the Strait of Hormuz, thus preventing one-sixth of the world's oil and 70% of OPEC's exports from reaching the market; no wonder oil traders are falling over themselves to lock up as much crude as they can.

    Forget about oil at an accessible $50 or even $75 a barrel. The price of oil may be destined to soon reach $120 a barrel and even $150 a barrel by summer, just as in crisis-hit 2008. OPEC, by the way, is pumping more oil than at any time since late 2008.

    So what started as an Israeli-concocted roadside improvised explosive device has now developed into a multiple economic suicide bombing targeting whole sections of the global economy.

    No wonder the chairman of the Iranian parliament's national security and foreign policy commission, Ala'eddin Broujerdi, has warned that the West may be committing a "strategic blunder" with these oil sanctions.

    Translation: as it goes, the name of the game for 2012 is deep global recession.

    Obama rolls the dice
    First Washington leaked that sanctions on Iran's central bank were "not on the table". After all, the Obama administration itself knew this would translate into an oil price hike and a certified one-way ticket for more global recession. The Iranian regime, on top of it, would be making more money out if its oil exports.

    Still, the Bibi-AIPAC combo had no trouble forcing the amendment through those Israel-firster Meccas, the US Senate and Congress - even with US Secretary of the Treasury Tim Geithner expressly against it.

    The amendment just passed may not represent the "crippling sanctions" vociferously demanded by the Israeli government. Tehran will feel the squeeze - but not to an intolerable level. Yet only those irresponsible people at the US Congress - despised by the overwhelming majority of Americans, according to any number of polls - could possibly believe they can take Iran's 2.5 million barrels of oil a day in exports off the global market with no drastic consequences for the global economy.

    Asia increasingly will need more oil - and will continue to buy oil from Iran. And oil prices will keep flirting with the stratosphere.

    So why did Obama sign it? For the Obama administration, everything now is about electoral calculus. Those terminal wackos in the Republican presidential circus - with the honorable exception of Ron Paul - are peddling war on Iran the moment they're elected, and substantial swathes of the American electorate are clueless enough to buy it.

    No one, though, is doing some basic math to conclude the American and European economies certainly don't need oil flirting with the $120 level if some minimal recovery is in the cards.

    Show me your balls Apart from that self-defeating, terminally in crisis euro/North Atlantic Treaty Organization bunch, everyone and his neighbor will be bypassing this Israeli-American declaration of economic war:
    - Russia already said it will circumvent it.
    - India is already paying for Iranian oil via Halkbank in Turkey.
    - Iran is actively negotiating to sell more oil to China. Iran is China's second-largest supplier, only behind Saudi Arabia. China pays in euros, and soon may be paying in yuan. By March they both will have sealed an agreement about new pricing.
    - Venezuela controls a bi-national bank with Iran since 2009; that's how Iran gets paid for business in Latin America.
    - Even traditional US allies want out. Turkey - which imports around 30% of its oil from Iran.
    - Will seek a waiver exempting Turkish oil importer Tupras from US sanctions.
    - And South Korea will also seek a waiver, to buy around 200,000 barrels a day - 10% of its oil - from Iran in 2012.

    China, India, South Korea, they all have complex two-way trade ties with Iran (China-Iran trade, for instance, is $30 billion a year, and growing). None of this will be extinguished because the Washington/Tel Aviv axis says so. So one should expect a rash of new private banks set up all across the developing world for the purpose of buying Iranian oil.

    Washington wouldn't have the balls to try to impose sanctions on Chinese banks because they will be dealing with Iran.

    On the other hand, one's got to praise Tehran's balls. After a relentless campaign of covert assassinations; abductions of Iranian scientists; cross-border attacks in Sistan-Balochistan province; Israeli sabotage of its infrastructure, with viruses and otherwise; invasion of territory via US spy drones; non-stop Israeli and Republican threats of an imminent "shock and awe"; and the US sale of $60 billion of weapons to Saudi Arabia, still Tehran won't balk.

    Tehran has just tested - successfully - its own cruise missiles, and in the Strait of Hormuz of all places. Then when Tehran reacts to the non-stop Western aggressive barrage, it is blamed with "acts of provocation".

    Last Friday, the New York Times editorial board was totally in love with the Pentagon's threats against Iran, as well as calling for "maximum economic pressure".

    The bottom line is that average Iranians will suffer - as average, crisis-hit, indebted Europeans will also suffer. The US economy will suffer. And whenever it feels the West is getting way too hysterical, Tehran will keep reserving the right to send oil prices skyrocketing.

    The regime in Tehran will keep selling oil, will keep enriching uranium and, most of all, won't fall. Like a Hellfire missile hitting a Pashtun wedding party, these Western sanctions will miserably fail. But not without collecting a lot of collateral damage - in the West itself.

    Pepe Escobar is the author of Globalistan: How the Globalized World is Dissolving into Liquid War (Nimble Books, 2007) and Red Zone Blues: a snapshot of Baghdad during the surge. His new book, just out, is Obama does Globalistan (Nimble Books, 2009).

  • #2
    Re: US-Iran economic war

    As
    the dollar -and the rest of the fiat currencies- are losing their value due to money printing, we are approaching a point where the world will simply reject them, and the West will not be able to have oil - at least not at "reasonable" prices by today's standards.

    This is why the USA "must" attack all the oil states who try to break free from the dollar, and start accepting other means of payment - because no mater how much it costs them to go to war, it will cost them a lot more if the world finally gets of the "dollar standard", and the value of the dollar goes to almost zero.

    The main thing that prevents the oil states from rejecting the dollar right now is their fear of being attacked by the USA - if that fear goes away, then they will be free to choose what currency to accept as means of payment.
    http://whataboutmarx.blogspot.com/20...than-just.html

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: US-Iran economic war

      More reccession - depressed spending due to inflated oil
      Pressure on other oil producing nations:
      Saudi
      Iraq
      Kuwait
      Venezuela (Hugo Chavez - soon to be villan de jeur... again)

      Canada - renewed 'need' - full-court press re: pipeline from Alberta to TX... Obama/admin gets bully-puplit from which to call out those anti-american types who won't/don't want a pipeline coming through their land/state... and in doing so are supporting 'terrorist regimes'.

      Eventually, enough hardship and hassle for everyday Americans/Euros swings public opinion to more accepting of an attack on Iran... to liberate the oil... er, I mean the people.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: US-Iran economic war

        Brilliant strategy on the Iranians part. There doesn't need to be a blockade or a shooting war. Just rattle the saber and watch oil prices spike. Every dollar per bbl. up is several billion dollars of pain imposed on the world economy.
        Greg

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: US-Iran economic war

          Well here comes the external conflict needed to create cost-push inflation to try and help inflate our debt away.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: US-Iran economic war

            No one is talking about India............India is going to better China, but not if she can't get her oil from Iran. India has a large armed forces, inclunding atomic & THERO-NUCLEAR weapons/Delivery systems.........She is disturstful of China & the West....she is trustful of Russia..........I wonder how she react to the West trying to cut her Oil????
            Mike

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: US-Iran economic war

              "A key amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act signed by United States President Barack Obama on the last day of 2011 - when no one was paying attention - imposes sanctions on any countries or companies that buy Iranian oil and pay for it through Iran's central bank. Starting this summer, anybody who does it is prevented from doing business with the US. "

              I don't understand what it means to pay for it through Iran's central bank. Is this the way oil is usually purchased from Iran? If it is, it seems like a simple matter to set up another funding mechanism. Does not going through the central bank mean that the purchaser has to use USD?

              If this is how China purchases oil from Iran, does that mean no trade with China? Does Japan buy Iranian oil? how about South Korea?

              Two things come to mind. First, "Never let a good crisis go to waste". This would let feds sink their tentacles further into the energy complex. Second, I think if the stock market crashes, gasoline prices spike, or unemployment rises before the election the O'man is toast. High oil prices have the ability to do all three.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: US-Iran economic war

                No More ZIRP For US Government


                Due to insane religious nuts like Senator Lee, the elites have decided to have a legal but unconstitutional coup: ‘Super Congress’: Debt Ceiling Negotiators Aim To Create New Legislative Body. Good lord, what’s next? The guillotine? French Directory – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
                Under the French Constitution of 1795, qualified property holders elected 750 legislators, who divided themselves into the Council of Five Hundred and the Council of Ancients. This bicameral legislature had a term of three years, with one-third of the members renewed every year. The Ancients held a suspensory veto, but possessed no initiative in legislation.
                [...]
                The system made provision for the stringent control of all local authorities by the central government. Since the new constitution sought to create a separation of powers, the directors had no voice in legislation or taxation, nor could directors or ministers sit in either house. The law guaranteed freedom of religion, freedom of the press, and freedom of labour, but forbade armed assemblies and even public meetings of political societies. Only individuals or public authorities could tender petitions…The finances had been so thoroughly ruined that the government could not have met its expenses without the plunder and the tribute of foreign countries. If peace were made, the armies would return home and the directors would have to face the exasperation of the rank-and-file who had lost their livelihood, as well as the ambition of generals who could, in a moment, brush them aside.
                The end result was Napoleon. When the Weimar government floundered, the end result was Hitler when Germany finally went bankrupt. Since the military is sucking down a huge, huge hunk of our budget, if this is endangered and the wages of the military aren’t paid on time, they will take over the government just like we saw in Egypt. This will fix nothing since the military leaders want more wars which is what happened when Hitler and Napoleon took over bankrupt empires that still had strong military systems pretty much intact.
                .
                Both Hitler and Napoleon promised guns and butter and brought in lots of loot for a while until military defeats reversed this and the people let invaders (Russia in both cases!) overthrow their armies. In the US, we have a very dangerous military machine that is mainly overseas. If Congress doesn’t pay them or if the US debt is degraded and thus, less desirable, we will have a coup more likely than an election. The military will not tolerate civilian spending if they have to be cut, too. Ending the many wars goes against the grain for the military which wants more of these wars for it increases their power.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: US-Iran economic war

                  I don't know. Maybe the US needs cost-push inflation, and this is just a well choreographed play?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: US-Iran economic war

                    There has been a lot of backroom horsetrading going on that we are not aware of. We'll know as these events transpire.

                    One example is Greece. Due to the crisis, and the fear that Greece may revert to the drachma, Greece recently started getting most of its oil from Iran. This was due to the fact that Greek oil traders had a hard time getting financing for oil purchases from more "friendly" sources. So Greece was forced to buy from Iran, which doesn't have as difficult terms for selling oil.

                    Well, just recently, Greece signed onto this oil embargo - and I still see oil being sold in Greece. What happened? Somebody is making sure Greece gets financing for oil from other sources in order for Greece (an EU member) to agree to the embargo.

                    I can't say anything about India - but the Greek situation tells me that a lot is going on behind closed doors.

                    November 11, 2011: Greece turns to Iranian oil as default fears deter trade

                    January 2, 2012: "Greece made it known that it was against the ban as it imports about 35 percent of its fuel from Iran. Italy and Spain are other major importers of Iranian crude.

                    However, the Greek Foreign Ministry believes that the embargo will be back on the EU agenda soon. The government has asked Greek fuel importers to seek alternative sources of oil that they could switch to but they have recently had trouble convincing suppliers in other countries to extend them credit due to the economic crisis in Greece." LINK

                    January 4th, 2012: EU agrees in principle on Iran oil ban :

                    "Diplomats said EU envoys had held talks on Iran in the last days of December, and that any objections to an oil embargo had been dropped - notably from crisis-hit Greece which gets a third of its oil from Iran, relying on Tehran's lenient financing. Spain and Italy are also big buyers."

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: US-Iran economic war

                      Iran, Russia Replace Dollar With Rial, Ruble in Trade, Fars Says

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X