Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    106

    Default U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void

    U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void

    http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1

    ATLANTA, Jan. 18, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision that serves to allow judges to void the Constitution in their courtrooms. The decision was issued on January 18, 2011, and the Court did not even explain the decision (Docket No. 10-632, 10-633, and 10-690). One word decisions: DENIED.

    Presented with this information and massive proof that was not contested in any manner by the accused judges, at least six of the justices voted to deny the petitions:

    "There is no legal or factual basis whatsoever for the decisions of the lower courts in this matter. These rulings were issued for corrupt reasons. Many of the judges in the Northern District of Georgia and the Eleventh Circuit are corrupt and violate laws and rules, as they have done in this case. The Supreme Court must recognize this Petition as one of the most serious matters ever presented to this Court."

    The key questions answered negatively by the U.S. Supreme Court was:

    "Whether federal courts must be stopped from operating corruptly and ignoring all laws, rules, and facts."

    By denying the petitions, SCOTUS has chosen to sanction corruption by federal judges and to allow federal judges to void sections of the Constitutional at will.

    William M. Windsor has been involved in legal action in the federal courts in Atlanta since 2006. Windsor was named a defendant in a civil lawsuit (1:06-CV-0714-ODE) in which Christopher Glynn of Maid of the Mist in Niagara Falls, swore under oath that Windsor did a variety of things including the crimes of theft and bribery. Windsor stated under oath that Christopher Glynn made it up and lied about absolutely everything that he swore. Windsor then obtained deposition testimony from Glynn and the other managers of the Maid of the Mist boat ride, and they admitted, under oath, that charges against Windsor were not true.

    Despite this undeniable proof, 32-year federal Judge Orinda D. Evans declared that the grandfather of three should not have fought the lawsuit, and she forced him to pay a fortune in legal fees of Maid of the Mist. Windsor appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, but federal judges Dubina, Hull, and Fay rubber-stamped Judge Evans' ruling. Windsor then took his appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court where the justices said the appeal was not worthy of their consideration (cert denied).

    After attempting to get the case reopened with new evidence that proved fraud upon the courts and obstruction of justice, Judge Evans and Judge William S. Duffey committed a variety of crimes and violations of Constitutional rights, as did judges with the Eleventh Circuit. All of this was detailed for the Supreme Court.

    Windsor says: "I have discovered that the federal judges in Atlanta, Georgia, Washington, DC, and the justices of the United States Supreme Court function like common criminals intentionally making bogus rulings against honest people while covering up the crimes of their fellow judges. I have been contacted by people from all over the country and around the world with their stories of judicial corruption with judges all over the U.S.

    "My charges have been totally ignored by the United States Attorney's Office, the FBI, and Congress. I do not believe there is a shred of decency, honesty, or Constitutional rights in our federal courts. In my opinion, we now live in a police state. Judges are free to do absolutely anything they want. Our laws are meaningless. Your life savings can be stolen by a federal judge, and they have no risk in violating every law in the books.

    "In my opinion, this is the most serious issue that our country has ever faced. Our rights have been stolen. And the mainstream media refuses to cover this story because they are afraid of the judges. Heaven help us.

    "I believe our only hope in America is if the masses become aware of what is taking place. I am writing an expose, and my book will be available at Borders, Barnes & Noble, and on amazon.com soon. The publisher will decide if the title is Lawless America or Screwed, Glued, and Tattooed."

    For more information, see www.LawlessAmerica.com.

    Contact: William Windsor, +1-770-578-1094, bill@lawlessamerica.com

    SOURCE William M. Windsor

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Haunted Manor
    Posts
    7,035

    Default Re: U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void

    Quote Originally Posted by billstew View Post
    U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void...

    By denying the petitions, SCOTUS has chosen to sanction corruption by federal judges and to allow federal judges to void sections of the Constitutional at will...
    Opponents of the Constitution may not want us to think of it, but fortunately the courts do not have sole custody of the founding document. Every elected legislator and executive swears to uphold the Constitution and therefore unconstitutionality is a legitimate ground for refusing to pass or sign legislation. Of course it's still subject to checks and balances, but no President, for example, should be reticent to veto a bill on the grounds of unconstitutionality if that is the case. And no congressman should feel obliged to vote for legislation he finds unconstitutional based on an argument that that's for the courts to decide.
    Finster
    ...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Medstead, United Kingdom
    Posts
    3,352

    Default Re: U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void

    Finster, had you seen this report regarding the lack of ethics of the Department of Justice Attorneys?

    Federal Judge in Texas Demands Justice Dept. Lawyers Take Ethics Class

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/20/us/andrew-hanen-immigration-texas-court.html

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-09-11, 06:55 PM
  2. Gerry Spence on the Supreme Court decision
    By Charles Mackay in forum News
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-27-10, 03:08 PM
  3. Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-22-10, 11:51 PM
  4. Replies: 27
    Last Post: 10-27-09, 03:33 PM

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Opinions expressed herein are those of the posters, not those of iTulip, Inc., its owners, or management. All material posted on this board becomes the intellectual property of the poster and iTulip, Inc., and may not be reposted in full on another website without the express written permission of iTulip, Inc. By exception, the original registered iTulip member who authored a post may repost his or her own material on other sites. Permission is hereby granted to repost brief excerpts of material from this forum on other websites provided that attribution and a link to the source is included with the reposted material.

Nothing on this website is intended or should be construed as investment advice. It is intended to be used for informational and entertainment purposes only. We reserve the right to make changes, including change in price, content, description, terms, etc. at any time without notice. By using this board you agree that you understand the risks of trading, and are solely responsible for your own investment and trading decisions. Read full legal disclaimer.

Journalists are not permitted to contact iTulip members through this forum's email and personal messaging services without written permission from iTulip, Inc. Requests for permission may be made via Contact Us.

Objectionable posts may be reported to the board administrators via Contact Us.

-->