Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void

    U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void

    http://www.breitbart.com/article.php...show_article=1

    ATLANTA, Jan. 18, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision that serves to allow judges to void the Constitution in their courtrooms. The decision was issued on January 18, 2011, and the Court did not even explain the decision (Docket No. 10-632, 10-633, and 10-690). One word decisions: DENIED.

    Presented with this information and massive proof that was not contested in any manner by the accused judges, at least six of the justices voted to deny the petitions:

    "There is no legal or factual basis whatsoever for the decisions of the lower courts in this matter. These rulings were issued for corrupt reasons. Many of the judges in the Northern District of Georgia and the Eleventh Circuit are corrupt and violate laws and rules, as they have done in this case. The Supreme Court must recognize this Petition as one of the most serious matters ever presented to this Court."

    The key questions answered negatively by the U.S. Supreme Court was:

    "Whether federal courts must be stopped from operating corruptly and ignoring all laws, rules, and facts."

    By denying the petitions, SCOTUS has chosen to sanction corruption by federal judges and to allow federal judges to void sections of the Constitutional at will.

    William M. Windsor has been involved in legal action in the federal courts in Atlanta since 2006. Windsor was named a defendant in a civil lawsuit (1:06-CV-0714-ODE) in which Christopher Glynn of Maid of the Mist in Niagara Falls, swore under oath that Windsor did a variety of things including the crimes of theft and bribery. Windsor stated under oath that Christopher Glynn made it up and lied about absolutely everything that he swore. Windsor then obtained deposition testimony from Glynn and the other managers of the Maid of the Mist boat ride, and they admitted, under oath, that charges against Windsor were not true.

    Despite this undeniable proof, 32-year federal Judge Orinda D. Evans declared that the grandfather of three should not have fought the lawsuit, and she forced him to pay a fortune in legal fees of Maid of the Mist. Windsor appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, but federal judges Dubina, Hull, and Fay rubber-stamped Judge Evans' ruling. Windsor then took his appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court where the justices said the appeal was not worthy of their consideration (cert denied).

    After attempting to get the case reopened with new evidence that proved fraud upon the courts and obstruction of justice, Judge Evans and Judge William S. Duffey committed a variety of crimes and violations of Constitutional rights, as did judges with the Eleventh Circuit. All of this was detailed for the Supreme Court.

    Windsor says: "I have discovered that the federal judges in Atlanta, Georgia, Washington, DC, and the justices of the United States Supreme Court function like common criminals intentionally making bogus rulings against honest people while covering up the crimes of their fellow judges. I have been contacted by people from all over the country and around the world with their stories of judicial corruption with judges all over the U.S.

    "My charges have been totally ignored by the United States Attorney's Office, the FBI, and Congress. I do not believe there is a shred of decency, honesty, or Constitutional rights in our federal courts. In my opinion, we now live in a police state. Judges are free to do absolutely anything they want. Our laws are meaningless. Your life savings can be stolen by a federal judge, and they have no risk in violating every law in the books.

    "In my opinion, this is the most serious issue that our country has ever faced. Our rights have been stolen. And the mainstream media refuses to cover this story because they are afraid of the judges. Heaven help us.

    "I believe our only hope in America is if the masses become aware of what is taking place. I am writing an expose, and my book will be available at Borders, Barnes & Noble, and on amazon.com soon. The publisher will decide if the title is Lawless America or Screwed, Glued, and Tattooed."

    For more information, see www.LawlessAmerica.com.

    Contact: William Windsor, +1-770-578-1094, bill@lawlessamerica.com

    SOURCE William M. Windsor

  • #2
    Re: U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void

    Originally posted by billstew View Post
    U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void...

    By denying the petitions, SCOTUS has chosen to sanction corruption by federal judges and to allow federal judges to void sections of the Constitutional at will...
    Opponents of the Constitution may not want us to think of it, but fortunately the courts do not have sole custody of the founding document. Every elected legislator and executive swears to uphold the Constitution and therefore unconstitutionality is a legitimate ground for refusing to pass or sign legislation. Of course it's still subject to checks and balances, but no President, for example, should be reticent to veto a bill on the grounds of unconstitutionality if that is the case. And no congressman should feel obliged to vote for legislation he finds unconstitutional based on an argument that that's for the courts to decide.
    Finster
    ...

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision: Constitution is Void

      Finster, had you seen this report regarding the lack of ethics of the Department of Justice Attorneys?

      Federal Judge in Texas Demands Justice Dept. Lawyers Take Ethics Class

      http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/20/us/andrew-hanen-immigration-texas-court.html

      Comment

      Working...
      X