Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Cramer cracks. Who gets bailed out? Wall Street or Main Street?

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    US, Europe and Asia
    Posts
    4,592

    Default Cramer cracks. Who gets bailed out? Wall Street or Main Street?

    Our opinion isn't that the Fed is an inherently bad institution any more than is the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan, the People's Bank of China, or any other central bank.

    The principle here is that the concept of free and efficient markets needs apply evenly not selectively. If it's okay for a business such as US auto parts company that fail because it bet the wrong way on the US auto industry, financial companies that make losing market bets should also be allowed to fail. Even the Japanese, famous for using public funds to support corrupt banks that made uneconomic loans to favored bank clients, allowed their second largest financial firm to go under in the early 1990s after their credit bubble popped. The head of the Japanese Ministry of Finance put it well when asked why the firm was allowed to fail: "Easy come, easy go."




    Of course, the Fed will need to step in at some point. We don't want our collapsing credit bubble to go the way the Japanese bubble went, like this...


    ... followed by this...




    On a personal note, we feel bad for Cramer. His people are not managing him appropriately. Perhaps they are aware that his mental health is suffering under the stress of being on the wrong side of the market and they are exploiting this for the entertainment value.

    We'll update you with some of the more amusing comments we're getting on the video from other sites, such as this one from the UK:

    The US Recession: ARMAGEDDON IT!


    LOL-worthy bit where argues with the host about the nature of "Armageddon".

    Is this the same Cramer that was ramping up the market not six months ago?

    Still, better late than never.

    Man, I wish we had entertaining financial coverage like this, it is a huge gap in the British media. The BBC just have a succession of boring people who offer commentary, but never really any opinions or analysis (I suppose a public sector broadcaster has problems going there). The UK version of this is some guy saying "There are limited reasons for concern at the present time" and blinking a lot. The rest don't even bother.
    Last edited by FRED; 08-07-07 at 02:15 PM. Reason: Added stome stuff, fixed some stuff.
    Ed.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Opinions expressed herein are those of the posters, not those of iTulip, Inc., its owners, or management. All material posted on this board becomes the intellectual property of the poster and iTulip, Inc., and may not be reposted in full on another website without the express written permission of iTulip, Inc. By exception, the original registered iTulip member who authored a post may repost his or her own material on other sites. Permission is hereby granted to repost brief excerpts of material from this forum on other websites provided that attribution and a link to the source is included with the reposted material.

Nothing on this website is intended or should be construed as investment advice. It is intended to be used for informational and entertainment purposes only. We reserve the right to make changes, including change in price, content, description, terms, etc. at any time without notice. By using this board you agree that you understand the risks of trading, and are solely responsible for your own investment and trading decisions. Read full legal disclaimer.

Journalists are not permitted to contact iTulip members through this forum's email and personal messaging services without written permission from iTulip, Inc. Requests for permission may be made via Contact Us.

Objectionable posts may be reported to the board administrators via Contact Us.

-->