Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Sec sues state of new jersey

  1. #1
    BiscayneSunrise's Avatar
    BiscayneSunrise is offline iTulip Ambassador; iTulip Select Premium Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    South Florida (Just Another Day in Paradise)
    Posts
    1,095

    Default Sec sues state of new jersey

    http://topics.wsj.com/article/SB2000...746251168.html

    SEC Sues New Jersey As States' Finances Stir Fears

    By KARA SCANNELL And JEANNETTE NEUMANN

    The Securities and Exchange Commission, in its first securities-fraud case against a state, accused New Jersey of misleading investors about the health of its two largest state pensions while selling billions of dollars in bonds.

    State authorities settled the case without admitting or denying wrongdoing.

    While it singled out New Jersey, the SEC is conducting several investigations into what other states disclosed about their weakened finances.

    States ranging from California to Illinois to New York have been thrown into financial difficulty by the economy but have been able to avoid disaster by selling bonds to investors, many of them individuals seeking safe, tax-free income.

    States as a whole face a trillion-dollar gap between the pensions, health care and other retirement benefits they have promised to public employees, and the money set aside to pay the benefits, according to a report by the Pew Center on the States.

    The SEC said it is concerned about how these problems are disclosed to investors.

    "We want to make sure that states or municipalities who go out and raise money from the public are adequately disclosing all material information in connection with their pension liabilities," said Elaine Greenberg, head of the SEC's municipal securities and public pension unit, which was created in January.

    In the New Jersey action, the SEC cited municipal bonds in 79 separate offerings totaling $26 billion from 2001 to 2007.

    Many of those sales occurred after the SEC said the state abandoned a plan to bring pension funding up to snuff.

    The SEC's filing in the civil case described a series of moves that it alleged misled investors into believing the state was adequately funding the $34 billion Teachers' Pension and Annuity Fund and the $28 billion Public Employees' Retirement System.

    The funds are the largest of seven funds in the $66.9 billion New Jersey retirement system.

    Among other things, the SEC said, the state didn't disclose it had abandoned a five-year plan to fund the pension plans. The pension system covers 689,000 current employees and retirees.

    In its settlement, New Jersey neither admitted nor denied wrongdoing but said it wouldn't do it again.

    The SEC didn't fine the state, citing its cooperation and remedial steps it has taken. No individuals were charged.

    No investors appeared to have been harmed. "New Jersey has never failed to pay a bond holder and never will," said Andrew Pratt, of the state Department of the Treasury. The state "aims to have the best bond disclosure in the nation and will continue to strive to achieve that goal," he said.

    The New Jersey Treasury and the state attorney general's office said in a joint statement that the state's credit rating hasn't been lowered since the SEC's inquiry began three years ago.

    The value of bonds held up through the recession and the investigation didn't push down prices, several large bond investors said.

    Gov. Chris Christie's office referred calls to the Treasury. A spokesman for former Gov. Jon Corzine said that as governor he threw the spotlight on pension underfunding. "The state put in more money during [Mr. Corzine's] term than his predecessors had done in the prior 15 years combined," said the spokesman, Josh Zeitz.

    New Jersey's pension problems were no secret. The state never contributed more than 30% of its required contribution between 2000 and 2006, according to the Pew report, and completely skipped its payment to the system last year.

    New Jersey will continue with plans to sell $2.25 billion in short-term bonds on Thursday, Mr. Pratt said.

    Investor demand for municipal bonds has been strong, with yields low on other investments that are perceived as safe, such as Treasury securities, bank deposits and highly rated bonds.

    Yields on some of the safest municipal bonds are at their lowest since 1981, reflecting high demand, according to UBS Financial Services Inc.

    Marilyn Cohen, president of Envision Capital Management in Los Angeles, said a "feeding frenzy" for munis may mute any impact of the SEC's case.

    The SEC has long sought to win the same rule-making powers in municipal bonds that it enjoys over corporations.

    Currently, it can tell companies what they have to disclose, but with munis, all it can do is bring a case if it suspects fraud. The SEC has asked Congress for expanded authority.

    New Jersey's disclosure problems began in 2001 after passage of a law requiring the state to increase the benefits it would pay and requiring the state to set up benefit-enhancement funds to hold a portion of assets to cover future costs.

    At the time, New Jersey's pensions were overfunded and flush with cash. The state revalued its assets in 2001 to create the benefit funds but used values from 1999, at the height of the tech bubble.

    That overstated pension assets by $2.4 billion, the SEC alleged, and wasn't disclosed.

    The state faces a $10 billion budget deficit next year, according to the Office of Legislative Services. About a third of that is unfunded pension liabilities.

    Beginning in 2003, the state's budget and other factors drove the pension from being overfunded to falling short a combined $3.8 billion.

    The state outlined its five-year plan to bring its pension to fully funded status and disclosed the plan in bond offering documents, but the SEC alleged that the state abandoned the project without telling investors.

    Steve Wollmer, a spokesman for the New Jersey Education Association, said the SEC charges "pull the curtain away and expose the state's malfeasance over the past 16 years" when successive governors failed to make required contributions to the pension system.

    —Stan Rosenberg contributed to this article
    Greg

  2. #2
    jiimbergin's Avatar
    jiimbergin is offline Contributing iTuliper, iTulip Select Premium Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    1,738

    Default Re: Sec sues state of new jersey

    there is already a thread about this

    http://www.itulip.com/forums/showthr...ght=sec+jersey

  3. #3
    BiscayneSunrise's Avatar
    BiscayneSunrise is offline iTulip Ambassador; iTulip Select Premium Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    South Florida (Just Another Day in Paradise)
    Posts
    1,095

    Default Re: Sec sues state of new jersey

    Oops. Sorry for the repeat. G
    Greg

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-19-10, 12:04 PM
  2. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 04-28-10, 12:44 AM
  3. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-06-09, 11:02 AM
  4. Replies: 22
    Last Post: 03-01-09, 12:18 PM

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Opinions expressed herein are those of the posters, not those of iTulip, Inc., its owners, or management. All material posted on this board becomes the intellectual property of the poster and iTulip, Inc., and may not be reposted in full on another website without the express written permission of iTulip, Inc. By exception, the original registered iTulip member who authored a post may repost his or her own material on other sites. Permission is hereby granted to repost brief excerpts of material from this forum on other websites provided that attribution and a link to the source is included with the reposted material.

Nothing on this website is intended or should be construed as investment advice. It is intended to be used for informational and entertainment purposes only. We reserve the right to make changes, including change in price, content, description, terms, etc. at any time without notice. By using this board you agree that you understand the risks of trading, and are solely responsible for your own investment and trading decisions. Read full legal disclaimer.

Journalists are not permitted to contact iTulip members through this forum's email and personal messaging services without written permission from iTulip, Inc. Requests for permission may be made via Contact Us.

Objectionable posts may be reported to the board administrators via Contact Us.

-->