Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Apocaholics Anonymous

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2006

    Default Apocaholics Anonymous

    See: Are You a Doomer?

    Welcome to
    “Apocaholics Anonymous” –

    Join Me in a
    Crusade for Panic-Free Living

    Updated for the
    Atlanta Investment Conference

    Anniversary Reunion, 8:45 am, April 20, 2007

    By Gary Alexander,
    Recovering Apocaholic

    Hi, I’m Gary
    and I’m a recovering Apocaholic. I am currently Apocalypse free for nearly 18
    years. I left the church of the Religious Apocalypse in 1976, over 30 years
    ago, and I resigned from the secular church of the Financial Apocalypse in
    1989. Yes, I still feel the urge to proclaim the end of all things, from time
    to time, but I white-knuckle my way to a history book for a little perspective,
    and then I breathe easier. If you wish to join AA, the only requirement is that
    you give up the adrenaline rush of media-fed fantasies.

    Since I spoke to you last on this subject, in 1994, we have
    survived “Bankruptcy 1995” (the original epidemic of Hockey Stock charts), the
    Big Bang in Hong Kong, years of Y2K scare stories, a SARS epidemic, Mad Cow
    disease, Bird Flu, a real threat on 9/11, Triple Deficits (Budget, Trade and
    Balance of Payments), wars in Serbia/Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan, Deflation in
    2003, Inflation since then, The Perfect Storms of 2005 (Katrina, Rita and Wilma,
    the 3 Witches of the Bermuda Triangle), and today’s reigning fears of Global
    Warming, $200 Oil and the Sub-prime Housing Loan Crisis Implosion.

    But before we go from today’s Sub-prime to the ridiculous
    claims of imminent collapse, let me introduce the depths of my past addiction to
    the Apocalypse. I was born in July 1945, the day the first atomic bomb exploded
    in Alamogordo, New Mexico. That mushroom crowd has haunted our lives ever
    since. As a teenager, I became convinced the world would end before I was 30.
    Too soon old…too late smart, I was very, very wrong:

    50 Years
    Ago (1957) – The “Duck and Cover” Generation

    My apocalyptic addiction began 50 years ago, in the Year of
    Sputnik, when all of us Seattle-area 7th graders – mostly the
    offspring of Boeing engineers – were told that we must now learn more science
    and math, to close the missile gap with the Soviet Union.

    Back in 1957, the U.S. was the proud owner of 100,000
    kilograms of U-235, in what was termed “45 times overkill” of the Soviets. But
    the Soviets had more missiles than we did. In that same year, 1957, the first
    underground nuclear explosion was set off near Las Vegas. In junior high, I
    soon became addicted to dystopian novels, like On the Beach, by Nevil
    Shute, a Briton who had moved to Australia, in order to be among the last on
    earth to be fried by the inevitable radiation cloud following nuclear
    Armageddon. The novel was adapted for the screen in 1959, directed by Stanley
    Kramer, and starring Gregory Peck as captain Dwight Lionel Towers of the USS
    Sawfish. The story was set in the near future, 1963 in the book (1964 in the
    movie), in the months following World War III. Nuclear fallout killed ALL life,
    with hot air currents killing off Australia last,

    The characters made their best effort to enjoy what
    remained of their life before dying from radiation poisoning. The film was shot
    in Melbourne, with a chilling ending of wind-swept but empty city streets there.
    That image has haunted me, to this day. I am convinced that this hopelessness
    sewed the seeds for the senseless rush to immediate gratification in the 1960s.
    With a world about to die, hedonism soon reigned supreme.

    In high school, I read Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World”
    and the scathing exposes and novels of Philip Wylie (1902-1971), son of a
    Presbyterian minister father and a novelist mother (who died when he was five).
    Wylie wrote apocalyptic nuclear war novels like “Tomorrow” (1954), about the
    atomic bombing of two fictional Midwest cities adjacent to each other in the
    mid-1950s. One had an effective civil defense program, and the other did not.
    Later, I read his novel, “Triumph” (1963), another graphic description of the
    effects of nuclear war story involving a worst-case USA/USSR “spasm war,” in
    which both sides emptied their arsenals into each other with extensive use of
    “dirty” bombs to maximize casualties, resulting in the main characters (in a
    very deep bomb shelter) being the sole survivors in the northern hemisphere, the
    new Adam and Eve of a new creation.

    In the financial realm, I was also becoming convinced that
    America’s economy was doomed, especially after reading John Kenneth Galbraith’s
    “The Affluent Society” (1958), which said the rich get richer and the poor get
    poorer, while advertising creates artificial demand in the West. The same theme
    was echoed in Vance Packard’s “The Hidden Persuaders” (1957). He followed up
    with “The Status Seekers” (1959) and “The Waste Makers” (1960). Also popular
    was a book we young cynics all read, “The Ugly American” (1958), by William
    Lederer and Eugene Burdick. America was supposedly incredibly shallow and
    bigoted in the 1950s, soon to be rescued by the Liberated 1960s.

    P.S. The world is still a dangerous and violent place, but
    the most chilling example of violent death now is in Africa, with machetes.
    We’ve now gone over 61 years without using nuclear bombs against humans – thank
    God. Back in the late 1960s, Herman Kahn wrote “On Thermonuclear War” and
    “Thinking the Unthinkable,” in which he demonstrated that we can survive a
    nuclear holocaust, but that didn’t seem likely in 1962:

    45 Years
    Ago (1962): The Cuban Missile Crisis and “Silent Spring”

    The closest we came to a nuclear exchange was in October,
    1962, during the Cuban Missile Crisis, in my high school senior year. That was
    one of the events that caused me to throw away a National Merit Scholarship and
    decide to attend a small church college that seemed to made sense of these
    global threats. Another impetus was the collapse of the global ecology, as
    demonstrated in another best-selling book that I read in 1962:

    Rachel Carson (1907-1964) published “Silent Spring” in
    1962, based on a compilation of articles she had written for The New Yorker.
    Her book is credited with launching the environmental movement that culminated
    in Earth Day (1970), including a worldwide ban on the main villain in her book,
    DDT. Silent Spring was a Book of the Month Club main selection, spending
    several weeks on the New York Times best seller list. It was actively
    endorsed by one of my heroes at the time, a Washington State native, Supreme
    Court Justice William O. Douglas, as well as many other nature advocates in my

    As a result of that book and further research, I wrote an
    extended scientific article for a national magazine in 1970, linking the
    chemicals in DDT to many of the pest sprays commonly used in homes. I wrote
    other articles supporting the ban in DDT, which I am ashamed to say, has caused
    the deaths of millions of Asians and Africans since then. Many insect-borne
    diseases were on the verge of extinction in 1970, when the U.S. tied foreign aid
    to poor nations to their “voluntary” banning of DDT, to our great shame.

    Knock, knock!

    Who’s There?


    Armageddon Who?

    Armageddon outa here!

    In 1963, I threw away my future to apply to Ambassador
    College and join the Worldwide Church of God, in effect saying “Armageddon Outa
    Here.” The book that motivated me the most was Herbert Armstrong’s “1975 in
    Prophecy,” in which he showed from several perspectives that the world couldn’t
    make it past 1975. After four years of their college indoctrination, I became a
    leading writer, editor and researcher for a decade (1966-76) for their
    publications, turning secular trends into Apocalyptic rhetoric in magazines and
    in the electronic radio media, writing radio and TV scripts for the voice of
    “The World Tomorrow,” the late Garner Ted Armstrong. I didn’t have long to wait
    for ammunition:

    40 Years
    Ago: “The Population Bomb!” and “Famine 1975”

    Upon graduation from college, my job of predicting the End
    of the World by 1975 was made incredibly easier by a wave of new books
    proclaiming the inevitable end, based on the centuries-old (and easily
    discredited) theories of Thomas Robert Malthus, who wrote in 1798 that
    population grew geometrically, but food production could only grow in small
    (arithmetic) increments. In 1967, the brothers William and Paul Paddock wrote a
    book called “Famine 1975,” in which they said it was impossible for food
    production to keep up with population growth. The title of their first chapter
    said, “The Population-Food Collision Is Inevitable; It Is Foredoomed.” The
    Paddocks believed that the Malthusian formula was on a collision course and all
    we could do was starve a little less than others.

    Then came Paul Ehrlich’s “The Population Bomb” (1968), in
    which he opened famously by saying, “The battle to feed humanity is over. In
    the 1970s and 1980s, hundreds of millions of people will starve to death, in
    spite of any crash programs embarked upon now.” Writing in Ramparts
    magazine, he went even further, “Hundreds of millions of people will soon perish
    in smog disasters in New York and Los Angeles…the oceans will die of DDT
    poisoning by 1979…the U.S. life expectancy will drop to 42 years by 1980, due to
    cancer epidemics.” Hepatitis and dysentery would sweep America by 1980 and
    nearly all of us would wear gas masks. Over 65 million Americans would starve
    in the 1980s, leaving only 22.6 million starved Americans alive in 1990. In
    1990, he incredibly justified his claims as being right – a trait common to
    Doomsday prophets. *

    * “The individual will frequently emerge not
    only unshaken but even more convinced of the truth of his beliefs than ever
    before. Indeed, he may even show a new fervor about convincing and converting
    other people to his view.” – Leon Festinger, “When Prophecies Fail.”

    In the meantime, Dr. Normal Borlaug was launching the Green
    Revolution, which has managed to feed billions more people on moderately more
    arable soil than in the 1960s. Instead of starving against our will, millions
    of us are trying to starve voluntarily – by dieting. Food is far cheaper,
    relative to the overall growth of the cost of living, than in the 1960s. From
    1977 to 1994, food costs fell 77% in real terms. Grain is in surplus, despite
    46 million idle arable acres of U.S. farmland, and 11 million idle acres in

    In the first 15 years after “Earth Day,” we made great
    progress against pollution. The amount of particulates spewed into the air fell
    by 64%, carbon monoxide emissions fell 38%, ocean dumping of industrial wastes
    was cut by 94%, and the number of rivers unfit for swimming dropped 44%. By
    1990, cars emitted 78% fewer pollutants. Yet Lester Brown’s annual “State of
    the Earth” keeps saying the opposite, that pollution is growing.

    And for anyone who still believes in Dr. Malthus, I have
    one word to share with you: Chickens! Are they food, or are they
    population? Do they grow arithmetically, or geometrically? On the Delmarva
    Peninsula alone, 90 million cluckers live their nasty, brutish, crowded and
    short lives on the way the chopping block and your local KFC.

    The famine/population fear is older than Malthus.
    Confucius thought the earth was full, 2500 years ago. Romans thought they had
    “worn out the earth.” St. Jerome said “the world is already full, and the
    population too large for the soil.” Tertullian wailed about “teeming populations
    of Carthage” with “numbers burdensome to the world.” He saw death from famine,
    war and disease as “the means of pruning the luxuriance of the human race.” In
    truth, Rome was rich when it was crowded, and a wasteland when it was empty.

    35 Years
    Ago – The Club of Rome and “The Limits to Growth”

    In the early 1970s, Garner Ted Armstrong pulled me aside
    and gave me a challenging new project, which might take years to finish. He
    said that all the globe’s trends are getting worse, and that if we could only
    “feed all these trends into a computer,” we could predict the precise time of
    the end. Maybe it’s 1975, as we all still thought at the time, or maybe it’s a
    little later than that. After all, we can count the hairs we lose each day and
    predict when we will go bald. So we could do the same with all other trends –
    depleting resources, increased crime, nuclear overkill, chemical and
    environmental pollutants, etc.

    Ambassador College had a new IBM 370 computer and a huge
    programming team at my disposal, so I set out on this impossible project full of
    hope. Two years later, I gave up, but a bunch of secular statisticians in
    Cambridge, Massachusetts did not give up. They fed all the same kind of data
    into Harvard’s massive mainframe and came out with their magnum opus, “Limits to
    Growth,” modeling the future consequences of growing world population and finite
    resources. The study was commissioned by the world’s aristocracy, gathered into
    a group they called the Club of Rome. Limits to Growth was written by Dennis
    and Donella Meadows, among many others. The book used computer simulation to
    project a rolling Doomsday. (All this made me feel like less of a religious

    In short, the report’s authors projected that, at the
    exponential growth rates they expected to continue, all the known world supplies
    of zinc, gold, tin, copper, oil, and natural gas would be completely exhausted
    in 1992. They set specific dates for each commodity. President Carter later
    bought into this idea and published his gloomy Global 2000 report.

    Then, along came Dr. Julian Simon, who bet Dr. Paul Ehrlich
    $1,000 that the price of commodities would FALL, not rise, implying an expansion
    of resources, rather than a contraction of supplies during the decade in which
    they were all to disappear – the 1980s.

    By 1985, instead of running out of oil, an oil glut pushed
    the price down from $40 to $10 a barrel. Shortages beget higher prices and more
    exploration, not depletion of resources. In the extreme cases, shortages create
    new technologies. A wood shortage in England in the early 17th
    Century led to the use of coal and the birth of the industrial revolution. A
    shortage of whales led to the use and discovery of petroleum, and electrical
    lighting. The stench of horse manure in urban streets led to the invention of
    the horseless carriage.

    30 Years
    Ago – Global Cooling and “The Next Ice Age”

    My final TV script for Garner Ted Armstrong came in 1975,
    when I was about to leave the cocoon of the Church of the Apocalypse for a more
    mundane job at the University of Southern California. He wanted a program on
    Global Cooling, or the Coming Ice Age. In 1975, there were several covers in
    major news magazines about the Coming Ice Age.

    One example was Newsweek, for the week of April 28,
    1975. It said that leading climate scientists were “almost unanimous” (sound
    familiar?) in their predictions of global cooling. Time Magazine had
    “The Coming Ice Age” on its cover, and the November 1976 issue of National
    had a lead article on the problem of global cooling.

    Later on, physicists combined the threat of natural cooling
    with nuclear war to predict a “Nuclear Winter.” Our future was clearly frigid.
    The trend from 1935 through 1975 was a gradual cooling of temperatures, since
    the Dust Bowl of the 1930s. (Most record-high state temperatures, to this day,
    were set in the 1930s, not in the 1990s, Mr. Gore.)

    One day in the control studio, Garner Ted Armstrong showed
    me a news clipping that pointed to the potential threat of carbon-dioxide
    emissions contributing to future global warming – a threat that currently
    assaults us in the daily media. He looked me in the eye, as his trusted
    researcher, and asked point blank, “Which is it – warming or cooling?”

    “With any luck, sir,” I quipped, “We’ll get both, and then
    they will offset each other.”

    He was not amused. But I was on my way out and no longer
    cared what he thought. I was happy that a peaceful new job awaited me at a less
    Apocalyptic California college. But that did not stop me from reading a series
    of best-sellers and coming back to the Doomsday business three years later. In
    the 1970s alone, all of this was “Coming…”

    * The Coming Dollar Devaluation (1970) by Harry

    * The Coming Dark Age (1971) by Roberto Vacca

    * The Coming Credit Collapse (1974), by Alexander

    * The Coming Bad Years (1978), but Howard Ruff

    * The Coming Real Estate Crash (1979) by English and

    The 1970s were also book-ended by two big #1 best-sellers
    telling the same story from the religious and secular angle: “The Late Great
    Planet Earth” by Hal Lindsey (1970) and “Crisis Investing” by Doug Casey
    (1979). They were the biggest best-sellers each year.

    25 Years
    Ago (1982): The Coming Kondratieff Collapse!

    I didn’t stay out of the Doomsday press for long. By 1979,
    I was back in the business, in Virginia, writing free-lance special reports for
    a leading direct mail marketer on a more secular version of The End of the
    World. As “Mr. X,” I wrote a series of reports on survival havens, banking
    secrecy, the collapse of the stock market and the fiat currency system. I was
    consulting editor to Survival Tomorrow, Tax Angles and Personal
    (formerly the Inflation Survival Letter) at KCI. In 1982, my first
    special report for Jim Blanchard was on the coming Third World Loan Crisis,
    leading to the demise of major New York City money center banks, including the
    much maligned Citibank.

    In brief, I said, trying to re-arrange loans to Third World
    nations was “like re-arranging deck chairs on the Titanic.” At the time, most
    Latin American nations were following the Juan Peron model, as military
    dictatorships, starting in Peru (from 1948 to 1980), then Venezuela (1952),
    Colombia (1953), Bolivia (1964), Brazil (1964), Uruguay (1972) and Chile, under
    Gen. Auguste Pinochet (1973 to 1988). The giant of the region, Brazil, was
    ruled by a succession of four-star generals from 1964 to 1985, as their economy
    reeled from one crisis to another. Central America was in the same condition.
    El Salvador was under the military’s thumb for over 60 years, from 1931 to
    1992. Then came military juntas in Guatemala (1954 to 1986), Honduras
    (1963-82), Nicaragua’s Sandinistas (1979-90) and Panama under General Noreiga
    (1968-89), so the situation indeed looked bleak.

    Latin America dominated the news in 1982, when I was
    writing that Third World debt threatened to bring down the region, and perhaps
    cause many major North American money center banks to fail. The major New York
    money banks and the U.S. Treasury of the late 1970s had loaned too much money to
    the “ABC” nations (Argentina, Brazil and Chile), who were each in default on
    those loans, after crippling back-to-back recessions.

    Like others, I said it was futile to re-arrange those
    loans. But behind the scenes, several New York bankers and Reagan-era Treasury
    officials quietly negotiated with the Latin American debtors, offering to
    reschedule their debts at lower interest rates, in exchange for some political
    concessions – such as free elections – which resulted in the gradual forced
    retirement of several military dictators. Throughout the mid-1980s, military
    juntas were replaced by democracies, the last one by a dramatic invasion of
    Panama in 1989.

    As a result of increased economic freedom south of the
    border, between 1987 and 1994, external debt as a percent of GDP declined by
    fully half in most Latin American nations: In Chile, external debt fell from
    109% of GDP in 1987 to 42% by 1994. Argentina’s debt fell from 58% of GDP to
    31%. The biggest basket case of the early 1980s, Brazil, reduced its external
    debt to the lowest level in Latin America, at just 25.8% by 1994. Even Mexico’s
    debt fell significantly, from 79% of GDP to 44%. We heard all about their high
    debt levels in the 1980s. But I bet your never heard the rest of the story. In
    1975, there were only 31 global democracies, but now, we have over 120

    By the way, Nikolai Kondratieff was proved right: The
    1979-82 depression came exactly 50 years after the 1929-32 depression, but none
    of the Doomsday prophets noticed that.

    20 Years
    Ago – A Wave of “Coming Crash” Books (after the Crash)

    The #1 Best-seller in 1987 was Dr. Ravi Batra’s “The Great
    Depression of 1990.” Dr. Batra turned out to be right on his timing, but wrong
    on his geography. Japan suffered a decade-long Great Depression in the 1990s,
    but according to Batra and others, Japan was the last place this could happen.
    Many other best-sellers of 1987 were proclaiming the superiority of the Japanese
    management system, Japan’s work ethic, its currency, its wealth and ability to
    “buy up American assets” from Hawaiian hotels to Hollywood studios. (As it
    turned out, Japan only knew how to pay way too much for those assets.)

    Several other authors (including me) tried their hands at
    “coming crash” books, sadly published about the same time the crash happened,
    failing to warn anyone in time, and keeping them from re-investing in stocks,
    which would have been the smartest move at the time. In the next wave of
    “coming crash” books, the overextended American debts were the paramount
    threat. Harry Browne wrote “The Economic Time Bomb: How You Can Profit from the
    Emerging Crisis” in 1989. Harry’s “bullet points” predict this:

    • Be ready for both a deep recession and severe
    • Why deposit insurance doesn’t make your bank account
    • How the trade deficit could trigger the next
    • Budget deficits have reached a limit – causing the
      worst recession since 1937.
    • An economic time bomb is set to implode – one wrong
      move can set it off.

    Not one threat came to pass, despite deeper budget deficits
    and trade deficits in 1990-91.

    Then came “The Great Reckoning” (1990), also predicting a
    “Depression in the 1990s.” But the 1990s turned out to be the best decade ever
    for global economic growth and the stock markets of free countries, as the Dow
    gained 5-fold, from 2,365 to 11,723.

    It was at this time (1990) that I wised up and, mercifully,
    partook in the bulk of that rise:

    10-50 Years Ago DOW
    10-Year Gain

    April 18, 1957 488.03 192.8%

    April 20, 1967 878.62 80.0%

    April 20, 1977 942.59 7.3%

    April 20, 1987 2270.60 140.9%

    April 21, 1997 6660.21 193.3%

    April of 2007 c. 12,500 87.7%

    60-Year Gain: 75-fold +7,400%

    For my grandchildren’s generation, I look for another
    75-fold gain in the next 60 years, despite threats from Global Warming, the
    Housing Crisis, the Triple Deficits in America, and anything else Doomsday
    prophets dream up in the future. I have been inoculated against such fears.
    Please join me in abandoning the siren song of the Prophets of Doom.

    Anonymous” Bibliography: For Further Reading

    (1) Proof that “Things
    Really are Getting Better”

    Anderson, Terry L., editor, “You Have to Admit It’s
    Getting Better: From Economic Prosperity to Environmental Quality,” Hoover
    Press, 202 pages.

    Goklany, Indur M., “The Improving State of the
    World: Why We’re Living Longer, Healthier, More Comfortable Lives, on a Cleaner
    Planet,” Cato Institute, 2007

    Lomborg, Bjorn, “The Skeptical Environmentalist:
    Measuring the Real State of the World,” Cambridge University Press, 1998, 352
    pages + 153p of notes and bibliography.

    Moore, Stephen & Simon Julian L., “It’s
    Getting Better All the Time: 100 Greatest Trends of the Last 100 Years, CATO
    Institute, 2000, 265 pages.

    Simon, Julian L., “Population Matters: People,
    Resources, Environment and Immigration,” Transaction Publishers, 1993

    (2) Countering the Current
    Global Warming Scare

    Avery, Dennis T. & Singer, S. Fred,
    “Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years,” Rowman & Littlefield, 2007

    Horner, Christopher C., “The Politically Incorrect
    Guide to Global Warming and Environmentalism,” Regnery Publishing, 2007

    Michaels, Patrick,
    “Shattered Consensus” (2005) and “Meltdown” (2003)

    (3) How Media and Mass
    Psychosis Mislead You

    Chafetz, Morris E., MD, “Big Fat Liars: How
    Politicians, Corporations, and the Media Use Science and Statistics to
    Manipulate the Public,” Nelson Current, 2005.

    Mackay, Charles, “Extraordinary Popular Delusions
    and the Madness of Crowds,” 1841 first edition, 700+ pages

    Simon, Julian, “Hoodwinking the Nation,” Transaction
    Publishers, 1999, 127 pages

    (4) Currently Popular
    Doomsday Books in 2007: Random Sampling

    Arnold, Daniel A., “The Great Bust Ahead: The
    Greatest Depression in American and UK History is Just Several Short Years

    Brussee, Warren: “The Second Great Depression:
    Starting 2007, Ending 2020”

    Panzner, Michael, “Financial Armageddon: Protecting
    Your Future from Four Impending Catastrophes.”

    Rubino, John, “How to Profit from the Coming Real
    Estate Bust”

    Schiff, Peter, “Crash Proof: How to Profit from the
    Coming Economic Collapse.”

    Wiedemer, David & Robert, “America’s Bubble Economy:
    Profit When it Pops”

    In addition, Bill Bonner’s & Addison Wiggin’s
    “Empire of Debt: The Rise of an Epic Financial Crisis” (a 2005 best-seller) will
    be turned into a documentary film in 2008. Perhaps they will join Al Gore in
    the Apocaholics Hall of Fame in Hollywood.

    Last edited by FRED; 06-27-07 at 04:57 PM.



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Opinions expressed herein are those of the posters, not those of iTulip, Inc., its owners, or management. All material posted on this board becomes the intellectual property of the poster and iTulip, Inc., and may not be reposted in full on another website without the express written permission of iTulip, Inc. By exception, the original registered iTulip member who authored a post may repost his or her own material on other sites. Permission is hereby granted to repost brief excerpts of material from this forum on other websites provided that attribution and a link to the source is included with the reposted material.

Nothing on this website is intended or should be construed as investment advice. It is intended to be used for informational and entertainment purposes only. We reserve the right to make changes, including change in price, content, description, terms, etc. at any time without notice. By using this board you agree that you understand the risks of trading, and are solely responsible for your own investment and trading decisions. Read full legal disclaimer.

Journalists are not permitted to contact iTulip members through this forum's email and personal messaging services without written permission from iTulip, Inc. Requests for permission may be made via Contact Us.

Objectionable posts may be reported to the board administrators via Contact Us.