Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Debt crisis(for the US) overblown? Comments

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Debt crisis(for the US) overblown? Comments

    I'd be curious to hear your thoughts....He almost makes me feel better...at least as long as interest rates remain low.

    http://www.minyanville.com/businessm...als&from=yahoo

  • #2
    Re: Debt crisis(for the US) overblown? Comments

    From the article:

    interest payments (not total debt service, which includes payment of principal) as a percent of GDP are equivalent to about 1.4% of GDP. Let me repeat: US government interest payments are only equivalent to roughly 1.4% of national income.

    Furthermore, if we factor in long-term inflation of about 2.5%, the US is essentially paying a real interest rate of about 1.00% on its debt. This translates into a real interest burden of about 0.4% of real GDP. This is almost an insignificant figure.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Debt crisis(for the US) overblown? Comments

      Originally posted by touhy View Post
      From the article:

      interest payments (not total debt service, which includes payment of principal) as a percent of GDP are equivalent to about 1.4% of GDP. Let me repeat: US government interest payments are only equivalent to roughly 1.4% of national income.

      Furthermore, if we factor in long-term inflation of about 2.5%, the US is essentially paying a real interest rate of about 1.00% on its debt. This translates into a real interest burden of about 0.4% of real GDP. This is almost an insignificant figure.
      It's misleading to describe GDP as 'income'. Turnover would be a more appropriate analogy. The correct comparison would be interest expense to tax receipts.
      It's Economics vs Thermodynamics. Thermodynamics wins.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Debt crisis(for the US) overblown? Comments

        Originally posted by *T* View Post
        It's misleading to describe GDP as 'income'. Turnover would be a more appropriate analogy. The correct comparison would be interest expense to tax receipts.
        I Really dislike deficit/interest/debt comparisons to GDP. There's a strong implication that GDP will grow at a healthy rate and that tax receipts will track that growth. Taxes are constantly changing and the political will to increase taxes to cover deficits isn't there. The emphasis should be on tax receipts and the discussion should be, how will we increase those receipts to cover our increasing debt. GDP is a level of abstraction intended to confuse more than inform.

        Comment

        Working...
        X