• MulaMan

    There is no available content written by MulaMan
  • Recent Forum Posts


    Re: Trump to win?

    you're talking reality, not appearances. your rational arguments have been true for a long time, but haven't changed behavior. the big budget is as much or more symbolic as all the carrier groups...

    jk Today, 12:00 PM Go to last post

    Re: Trump to win?

    The US does not need to increase spending to have a strong military. We could could cut our defense budget in half and still spend more than any other country. As far as appearances we have as many...

    DSpencer Today, 11:44 AM Go to last post

    Re: Trump will be the Republican nominee

    What do you mean "turns?" The Clintons started that job decades ago by repealing Glass-Steagall and turning the Democratic Party into a cash-only whore house. Adams and Jefferson apparently had...

    Woodsman Today, 06:15 AM Go to last post
    Milton Kuo

    Re: Trump will be the Republican nominee

    The U.S. was casino-ized in the dot-com bubble, the reflationary housing/credit bubble, and now whatever the current reflation is (the reflation of the reflation).

    Milton Kuo Today, 04:06 AM Go to last post

    Re: Trump will be the Republican nominee

    Jefferson and Adams roll in their graves as Trump turns the US into an Atlantic City casino.

    santafe2 Yesterday, 10:39 PM Go to last post

    Re: Trump to win?

    i don't know that we can be SURE about anything. however, i think a strong military would be meaningful to someone with trump's personality. he is very caught up in appearances.

    jk Yesterday, 08:56 PM Go to last post

    Re: Trump to win?

    Some Trump supporters seem to think (hope?) that a lot of his more outrageous statements are just to attract certain voters or get news coverage. He doesn't really mean that. And they point out his...

    LazyBoy Yesterday, 08:49 PM Go to last post

    Re: Trump will be the Republican nominee

    unfortunately you can't refinance the u.s. debt. the treasury has not issued callable bonds since 1985.

    edit: just read a new thread started by poz, sounds like trump doesn't mean a refi like a...

    jk Yesterday, 08:29 PM Go to last post
Opinions expressed herein are those of the posters, not those of iTulip, Inc., its owners, or management. All material posted on this board becomes the intellectual property of the poster and iTulip, Inc., and may not be reposted in full on another website without the express written permission of iTulip, Inc. By exception, the original registered iTulip member who authored a post may repost his or her own material on other sites. Permission is hereby granted to repost brief excerpts of material from this forum on other websites provided that attribution and a link to the source is included with the reposted material.

Nothing on this website is intended or should be construed as investment advice. It is intended to be used for informational and entertainment purposes only. We reserve the right to make changes, including change in price, content, description, terms, etc. at any time without notice. By using this board you agree that you understand the risks of trading, and are solely responsible for your own investment and trading decisions. Read full legal disclaimer.

Journalists are not permitted to contact iTulip members through this forum's email and personal messaging services without written permission from iTulip, Inc. Requests for permission may be made via Contact Us.

Objectionable posts may be reported to the board administrators via Contact Us.