Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FIRE Economy turns turtle

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • FIRE Economy turns turtle

    FIRE Economy turns turtle

    by Dave Cohen
    And a man's foes [shall be] they of his own household
    — Mark's Gospel, 10:36

    "What you have told us is rubbish. The world is really a flat plate supported on the back of a giant tortoise." The scientist replied, "What is the tortoise standing on?" "You're very clever, young man, very clever," said the old lady. "But it's turtles all the way down!"
    — comments made (perhaps) to Bertrand Russell
    Today I will make the crucial link between our unsound economy and the future of manufacturing in the United States. I will focus on the auto industry, which has been so crucial to our past economic health and figures greatly in our future oil consumption. In Should We Save General Motors? I pointed out the important difference between "productive works" like the Chevy Volt and derivatives like credit default swaps (CDS), which enabled gambling (not hedging) leading to pointless but profitable exchanges of paper money in the finance industry.

    In No, We Can't? I described the tragic misallocation of capital flowing from the Treasury and the Central Bank into the private banking system. Substantial amounts of money have been funneled through AIG to their CDS counterparties, which are the same banks (like Goldman Sachs) receiving TARP money and loan guarantees. This ultimately self-defeating behavior emanates from the cozy relationship between the Federal government and our out-sized finance sector, which was recently described at length in The Quiet Coup by Simon Johnson (The Atlantic, May, 2009). (See: The Big Bet)

    Tim Geithner has now revealed his extremely dangerous plan to bribe private equity and hedge funds to buy up toxic bank assets with the public taking almost all of the risk. Apparently I used the wrong wording and punctuation the last time around—it should have been called No We Won't! Obama met with the bankers last Friday. His spokesman Robert Gibbs described the meeting's agenda.

    Spokesman Robert Gibbs said the president would seek the executives' input on how the economy is developing. "The president looks forward to getting an update on what they're seeing happening in the economy," Gibbs said on Wednesday of the banking chief executives who are slated to meet with the president later this week.

    He said Obama's message at the meeting would be to say that what is good for Wall Street is good for Main Street.

    "We're all in the same boat," Gibbs said. "We have to understand that ... what is good for one has to be also good for the other [emphasis added]

    Plainly, we are not all in the same boat. Gibbs has delivered the kiss of the death to Main Street. This phrase derives from Judas' identification of Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane. Jesus goes on to suffer The Passion, but working Americans are being crucified (sacrificed) this time around. In the Gospels, Judas' kiss is a betrayal.

    Only the oldest among you will remember the words of General Motors' CEO "Engine" Charlie Wilson in 1953.

    In his closed hearing on Jan. 15, 1953, Wilson defended his investments and his integrity, saying he never could have risen to the top of GM if he had been crooked. Sen. Robert Hendrickson, R-N.J., asked whether, given his investments in GM, he could make a decision that would hurt the company... [Wilson replied as follows]

    "I cannot conceive of one, because for years I thought what was good for our country was good for General Motors and vice versa. The difference did not exist. Our company is too big. It goes with the welfare of the country."

    Fast forward 56 years later. Try this quote on for size: "Asked whether he could make a decision that would hurt the company, CEO Stan O'Neal replied `I can not conceive of one, because for years I thought what was good for our country was good for Merrill Lynch and vice versa´." Just doesn't ring true, does it? A lot has changed since Charlie Wilson's day, and not much of it for the better from our perspective in 2009.

    Finance Versus Manufacturing

    Today the President got tough with General Motors and Chrysler, Bloomberg, March 30, 2009).

    President Barack Obama said General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC. must survive without becoming “wards of the state” and the companies have one last, limited chance to “fundamentally restructure.”

    ...“We cannot and must not, and we will not let our auto industry simply vanish,” the president said at the White House, announcing new and final deadlines for the No. 1 and No. 3 U.S. automakers to remake themselves [but] “we cannot continue to excuse poor decisions. We cannot make the survival of our auto industry dependent on an unending flow of taxpayer dollars.”

    Obama is adamant that General Motors and Chrysler should not become "wards of the state." And what of an unending flow of taxpayer dollars? And poor decision-making? This all sounds very familiar. Where have we heard this before?

    In his description of America's rebirth as a Banana Republic, Simon Johnson touches on the expansion of finance in recent decades.

    The financial industry has not always enjoyed such favored treatment. But for the past 25 years or so, finance has boomed, becoming ever more powerful. The boom began with the Reagan years, and it only gained strength with the de-regulatory policies of the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations....

    Not surprisingly, Wall Street ran with these opportunities. From 1973 to 1985, the financial sector never earned more than 16 percent of domestic corporate profits. In 1986, that figure reached 19 percent. In the 1990s, it oscillated between 21 percent and 30 percent, higher than it had ever been in the postwar period. This decade, it reached 41 percent. Pay rose just as dramatically...

    Johnson is right about the influence of the banks, but Wall Street's galling takeover of our economy (Figure 1) is not the whole story.


    Figure 1 — Taken from How might the current financial crisis shape financial sector regulation and structure? by Már Gudmundsson, Deputy Head of the Monetary and Economic Department of the Bank for International Settlements. Also shown are similar rises in Japan and some EU countries. This speech is worth reading.
    Gudmundsson's graph displays the growing share of GDP appropriated by what iTulip's Eric Janszen calls the FIRE economy (Finance, Insurance and Real Estate). This alarming growth came at the expense of manufacturing in the United States. The following passage is taken from Manufacturing continues to shrink as a percentage of U.S. economic activity. The analysis was done in 2006 at the height of the madness.

    Manufacturing's share of the U.S. economy continues its 50-year decline. Last year, manufacturing GDP fell to an all-time low of just 12 percent of the economy, according to a Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI analysis of recent data from the Commerce Department.

    "Both major segments of manufacturing--durable and nondurable industries--declined," according to MAPI. Durable manufacturing accounted for 7 percent of the economy last year, down from 9.2 percent in 1995. Nondurable manufacturing fell to just 5 percent of the economy, from 6.7 percent in 1995.

    Manufacturing represented only 12% of GDP while the categories finance and insurance taken together with real estate, rental and leasing3 million manufacturing jobs between 1998 and 2003.

    The BEA's final revision indicates that U.S. GDP fell 6.3% in the final quarter of 2008. How did manufacturing fare over the entire year?

    According to the measure of profits before tax with inventory valuation adjustment, domestic profits of financial and non-financial corporations decreased in 2008. The decrease in non-financial corporations reflected decreases in all industries shown. The largest decrease was in manufacturing, and within manufacturing, the largest decreases were in “other” durable goods and in motor vehicles. [emphasis added]

    President Obama rightly says that "we will not let our auto industry simply vanish," but he continues to coddle finance while chastising the car companies for making poor decisions. The now decrepit state of the auto industry is not just a result of their own mismanagement or the strength of the UAW—it is mostly a direct result of "poor" decisions made by bloated plutocrats on Wall Street. Greed-driven, non-productive investments in credit derivatives have now brought down Main Street, which binged on all the new credit the banks made available.

    GM did not make bad or the wrong cars in recent years. However we view it, the domestic automakers gave the people what they wanted. Dubious enterprises like GMAC dispensed loads of credit to grease the wheels. At least General Motors made something instead of selling AAA-rated collateralized debt obligations based on pools of lousy mortgages.

    In his State of Union speech, the president asserted that "new plug-in hybrids roll off our assembly lines, but they will run on batteries made in Korea." Those new Chevy Volts aren't rolling off our assembly lines yet, but they will certainly have batteries made by LG Chem of South Korea if and when they do. But who will buy them? What is the prognosis for domestic car sales?

    How is Main Street Doing?

    President Obama laid out guarantees for car buyers in his speech on the fate of automakers.

    “If you buy a car from Chrysler or General Motors, you will be able to get your car serviced and repaired, just like always,” President Obama said during a speech from the White House. “Your warranty will be safe. In fact, it will be safer than it’s ever been, because starting today, the United States government will stand behind your warranty.”

    "If you buy a car anytime this year, you may be able to deduct the cost of any sales and excise taxes," the president promised.

    "We are working intensively with the auto finance companies to increase the flow of credit to both consumers and dealers," Obama pledged.

    How are car sales doing? Economist James Hamilton, who appreciates the role of an ever-diminishing manufacturing sector in America's economic health, gave us his latest update on March 8, 2009.


    Figure 2 — Taken from Hamilton's excellent Econbrowser blog. Sales in the first two months of 2009 were approximately half of what they were in 2004. The good years were 2004-2007.
    Why are cars sales in the dumper? Listening to the president, you might assume that only a weak flow of credit is preventing brisk new car sales. Once illiquid—not insolvent—banks start making loans again, everything will be fine as auto sales just pick up where they left off a few years ago.

    The president's story is seriously incomplete. It's as though he has blinders on, but we know the reason why. Obama can only see the credit extension problem on Wall Street, not the debt obligation problem on Main Street. Pictures tell part of the story. I will rely on some data posted by Calculated Risk based on the Fed's 2008 Q4 Flow of Funds report. (See Flow of Funds Q4 2008: Debt Deflation confirmation - Eric Janszen)


    Figure 3 — From Calculated Risk. Annotated to reflect his comment: "This is the Households and Nonprofit Net Worth as a percent of GDP.This includes real estate and financial assets (stocks, bonds, pension reserves, deposits, etc) net of liabilities (mostly mortgages). This ratio was relatively stable for almost 50 years, and then ... bubbles!" A FIRE economy can not "thrive" without bubbles.

    Figure 4 — Taken from Tim Iacono's Seeking Alpha report on March 12, 2009. Bubbly total household assets are now starting to revert back to their pre-2002 level. How far will they fall in 2009?

    Figure 5 — From Calculated Risk. His comment: "This graph shows household real estate assets and mortgage debt as a percent of GDP. Household assets as a percent of GDP is now declining rapidly. Mortgage debt as a percent of GDP was up slightly in Q4, and is only declining slowly. It's an old lesson: Assets values can fall quickly, but debt lingers!" [emphasis added]
    These graphs show the staggering loss of wealth in American households. This trend is far from complete. Today's Case-Shiller index of house values in 20 cities dropped a record 19% year-over-year in January, 2009. (Economic indicators lag the present.) U.S. News & World Report posted a story about wealth losses in 2008.

    The numbers from the Fed's Flow of Funds report for the fourth quarter are ugly:
    1. The showstopper in today's report was the larger-than-expected $5.1 trillion decline in household net worth. The 9% decline in wealth was easily the largest on record and pushes the much-watched wealth-to-income ratio for the household sector down to 4.83, the lowest since 95Q1.
    2. Since peaking in the second quarter of 2007, household wealth is down almost $13 trillion. Given where the S&P500 is now (around 740) and recent house price data, we estimate consumers have lost about another $2.5 trillion in the first quarter of the year.

    These numbers are absolute death for workers who are more and more dependent on assets rather than incomes for long-term wealth building. This is why the White House can't dismiss the stock market as some sort of mere tracking poll. In terms of wealth destruction, this downturn is already like a half a Great Depression. [emphasis added. Assets rather than wages have been important to workers because real wages have been flat for most of the last decade.]

    To make a long story short, people bought cars (and houses) in large numbers between 2004-2007 because they felt rich. Now all that inflated paper wealth is dwindling away as house and stock market prices continue to fall, despite the recent dead cat bounce in the Dow and S&P 500. Most alarmingly, Figure 5 demonstrates that "asset values can fall quickly but debt lingers!"

    Americans are thus increasingly squeezed between their declining net worth and their overlarge debt. At what rate will they be buying new cars, let alone those made domestically, in the future? The outlook does not look good. There are a lot of fairly new cars out there that don't have to be replaced for years. And if you absolutely have to have one, you can always buy something used. Even a restructured General Motors will have trouble surviving as sales tumble in the short-term and remain low for several years to come. It is hard to see how Obama's sales pitch will work if Americans follow their own best interests.

    These are the real consequences for manufacturing in an out-of-control FIRE economy. It will not be possible to pile more debt upon too much debt to jump start the economy. Americans must pay off their debt before any new spending spree can begin again. General Motors may need life-support for several years if they are to stay in business. If we had given them even half the money (after a bankruptcy and restructuring) that has been laundered through AIG to its counter-parties the banks since last September, that would have been a good start—if you want to ever see a $40,000 Chevy Volt, that is.

    Liquid Fuels Efficiency in a Prolonged Downturn

    The downturn on Main Street accompanying our maintenance of a FIRE economy also has severe consequences for U.S. energy policy.The saving grace for Obama's administration is that global oil demand will likely stay low for several years.

    Unfortunately, so will oil prices. Where is the incentive to buy those pricey Chevy Volts (with their Korean batteries) when they start rolling off our assembly lines? iTulip takes a particularly grim view of the timing of new alternative energy projects (Figure 6).

    Figure 6 — iTulip's prediction for an alternative energy bull market.
    On this view, even if large-scale 2nd-generation biofuels production from cellulosic feedstocks were technically and logistically feasible—it's not and might never be—we would not see that production until at least 2020 based on the shaky economy alone.

    In Steve Chu's Energy Miscalculations, I demonstrated that Energy Secretary Chu's vision for increased liquid fuels efficiency in the U.S. depends almost entirely on higher CAFE standards. A prolonged downturn poses many problems for an already inadequate strategy.
    • If few are buying new cars, which lowers the turnover rate for a fleet of 250 million vehicles, CAFE standards have much weaker effects on fuel efficiency over time.
    • New technology companies who want to make HEV or PHEV vehicles will be hesitant to enter a very slow global market.
    • Even when new companies do start-up, sales for new types of products (like PHEVs) always follow an S-shaped curve. Thus achieving significant market penetration would take more than a decade even without a depressed economy. (See my Energy Miscalculations.)

    Now deposed GM CEO Rick Wagoner is aware of the problems.

    Wagoner hinted that government may want to consider designing new negative incentives for consumers to purchase highly fuel-efficient vehicles.

    He noted that hybrid sales have fallen off a cliff this year due to the relatively high price of hybrid automobiles and the low price of fuel. "Consumers don't have an incentive themselves" to purchase vehicles that stray from the traditional petroleum model, said Wagoner, and he pointed to Europe as an example of governments creating incentives for consumers. (In Western Europe, government taxes push gas prices past $5 per gallon.)

    In a prolonged downturn, it will surely be impossible to stimulate spending by means of "negative incentives" like raising gasoline taxes. That would just make a bad situation worse.

    The central dogma of every government since Jimmie Carter—ever-greater debt fueling economic growth—is dead. We can not overlay too much debt with more debt—it is not turtles all the way down. We can not buy new cars we can not afford. Sorry, Mr. President, even you can not resurrect the dead.

    See also:
    USA, Inc. Common Shares: Long or Short?
    Debt brings down venerable manufacturing firms, right on schedule - Eric Janszen
    Pop goes the Globaloney Economy - Eric Janszen

    Dave Cohen writes for The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas (ASPO-USA). Contact the author at dave.aspo@gmail.com

    (Photo credit: gomichild)

    iTulip Select: The Investment Thesis for the Next Cycle™
    __________________________________________________

    To receive the iTulip Newsletter or iTulip Alerts, Join our FREE Email Mailing List

    Copyright © iTulip, Inc. 1998 - 2009 All Rights Reserved

    All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Nothing appearing on this website should be considered a recommendation to buy or to sell any security or related financial instrument. iTulip, Inc. is not liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. Full Disclaimer
    Last edited by FRED; 04-01-09, 06:33 PM.
    Ed.

  • #2
    Re: FIRE Economy turns turtle

    Originally posted by FRED View Post

    Liquid Fuels Efficiency in a Prolonged Downturn

    The downturn on Main Street accompanying our maintenance of a FIRE economy also has severe consequences for U.S. energy policy.The saving grace for Obama's administration is that global oil demand will likely stay low for several years.

    Unfortunately, so will oil prices. Where is the incentive to buy those pricey Chevy Volts (with their Korean batteries) when they start rolling off our assembly lines? iTulip takes a particularly grim view of the timing of new alternative energy projects (Figure 6).


    Figure 6 — iTulip's prediction for an alternative energy bull market.
    On this view, even if large-scale 2nd-generation biofuels production from cellulosic feedstocks were technically and logistically feasible—it's not and might never be—we would not see that production until at least 2020 based on the shaky economy alone.

    In Steve Chu's Energy Miscalculations, I demonstrated that Energy Secretary Chu's vision for increased liquid fuels efficiency in the U.S. depends almost entirely on higher CAFE standards. A prolonged downturn poses many problems for an already inadequate strategy.
    • If few are buying new cars, which lowers the turnover rate for a fleet of 250 million vehicles, CAFE standards have much weaker effects on fuel efficiency over time.
    • New technology companies who want to make HEV or PHEV vehicles will be hesitant to enter a very slow global market.
    • Even when new companies do start-up, sales for new types of products (like PHEVs) always follow an S-shaped curve. Thus achieving significant market penetration would take more than a decade even without a depressed economy. (See my Energy Miscalculations.)
    Now deposed GM CEO Rick Wagoner is aware of the problems.

    Wagoner hinted that government may want to consider designing new negative incentives for consumers to purchase highly fuel-efficient vehicles.

    He noted that hybrid sales have fallen off a cliff this year due to the relatively high price of hybrid automobiles and the low price of fuel. "Consumers don't have an incentive themselves" to purchase vehicles that stray from the traditional petroleum model, said Wagoner, and he pointed to Europe as an example of governments creating incentives for consumers. (In Western Europe, government taxes push gas prices past $5 per gallon.)

    In a prolonged downturn, it will surely be impossible to stimulate spending by means of "negative incentives" like raising gasoline taxes. That would just make a bad situation worse.

    "The low price of fuel" is not the only factor driving the sales volumes of hybrid cars, and it may not even be the most important factor.

    USA hybrid vehicle sales fell off a cliff in 2008 months before the price of gasoline peaked, and have never come close to their all time peak of 45,000 units in May of 2007.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: FIRE Economy turns turtle

      "We can not overlay too much debt with more debt—it is not turtles all the way down. We can not buy new cars we can not afford. Sorry, Mr. President, even you can not resurrect the dead."

      A truer statement could not have been made. I started a referral service for bankruptcy attorneys a year or so ago – OMG you guys would not believe the stories.

      rick

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: FIRE Economy turns turtle

        What makes the statistic on the decline of manufacturing even more terrifying is the Government's definitiion of "manufacturing," which includes things like flour, cheese, animal slaughtering, chocolate and coffee. :eek: Funny how these expansions were added when things I'd define as "manufacturing" hit the skids several years ago. What a coincidence.

        The full, eye-popping list is here:

        http://www.census.gov/indicator/www/m3/appendixb.pdf

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: FIRE Economy turns turtle

          Its the END of the UK-USA-Euro-........Ah HELL, WHITE MANS EMPIRE.....not even ISREAL can save it now!


          The "Buzz" out of London is "They" are going to PRINT!

          Mike

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: FIRE Economy turns turtle

            Can FIRE change its Nature :rolleyes:

            The Fire Scorpion needed to cross the river. He had no chance on his own.

            The turtle, nearby, crossed the river every day.

            "Turtle, can you carry me to the other side?"

            "No', said the turtle, "you will sting me when my head is exposed."

            The fire scorpion assured the turtle that would never happen.

            The turtle, after a long deliberation, decided to take that chance.

            Across the river they went, the turtle stretched out from his shell, swimming steadily toward the far shore.

            The scorpion, true to his word, rode peacefully on the turtle's shell just behind his neck.

            As they reached the far shore and the scorpion was out of danger, he struck the turtle a killing sting to the neck.

            "Why", asked the dying turtle, "you promised me you wouldn't sting me."

            "I know", said the scorpion, "but I couldn't help myself. You see by nature I'm a scorpion."

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: FIRE Economy turns turtle

              I agree with most of this post. Here are some comments.

              1. Short sighted financial planning had a lot to do with GM's demise. I think the business model was, we can't compete with small/medium sized car imports, so lets create large vehicles with high profit margins. That worked real well until gas hit 4.00+ a gallon, and financing or the desire to own a 30K+ SUV no longer existed.

              2. I'm in the market to replace my small commuter car (1995 mazda). First as the article says Hybrids are too expensive, i also dont know how the repairs on these will be once they are off warranty. Can my local shop guy fix it if its electrical/drive train? Or will I have to take it to the dealer and be soaked with 120$/hr repair costs? I will buy used, who knows if I will have a job next month?? I compared ford focus, saturn ion, toyota echo, nissan sentra, honda civic.
              Using govt fuel data scion, honda, and toyota all have significantly higher fuel economy than the ford/saturn vehicles (upper 20's vs. lower 20's). I also looked up the consumer's reports reliability records on these models, and scion, toyota, honda are significantly better in reliability. maybe that is why ford/chrysler/gm are where they are today. they still dont get.
              J6P (me) needs a reliable fuel efficient car.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: FIRE Economy turns turtle

                Originally posted by FRED View Post
                FIRE Economy turns turtle

                by Dave Cohen
                And a man's foes [shall be] they of his own household
                — Mark's Gospel, 10:36

                "What you have told us is rubbish. The world is really a flat plate supported on the back of a giant tortoise." The scientist replied, "What is the tortoise standing on?" "You're very clever, young man, very clever," said the old lady. "But it's turtles all the way down!"
                — comments made (perhaps) to Bertrand Russell
                Today I will make the crucial link between our unsound economy and the future of manufacturing in the United States. I will focus on the auto industry, which has been so crucial to our past economic health and figures greatly in our future oil consumption. In Should We Save General Motors? I pointed out the important difference between "productive works" like the Chevy Volt and derivatives like credit default swaps (CDS), which enabled gambling (not hedging) leading to pointless but profitable exchanges of paper money in the finance industry.

                In No, We Can't? I described the tragic misallocation of capital flowing from the Treasury and the Central Bank into the private banking system. Substantial amounts of money have been funneled through AIG to their CDS counterparties, which are the same banks (like Goldman Sachs) receiving TARP money and loan guarantees. This ultimately self-defeating behavior emanates from the cozy relationship between the Federal government and our out-sized finance sector, which was recently described at length in The Quiet Coup by Simon Johnson (The Atlantic, May, 2009). (See: The Big Bet)

                Tim Geithner has now revealed his extremely dangerous plan to bribe private equity and hedge funds to buy up toxic bank assets with the public taking almost all of the risk. Apparently I used the wrong wording and punctuation the last time around—it should have been called No We Won't! Obama met with the bankers last Friday. His spokesman Robert Gibbs described the meeting's agenda.

                Spokesman Robert Gibbs said the president would seek the executives' input on how the economy is developing. "The president looks forward to getting an update on what they're seeing happening in the economy," Gibbs said on Wednesday of the banking chief executives who are slated to meet with the president later this week.

                He said Obama's message at the meeting would be to say that what is good for Wall Street is good for Main Street.

                "We're all in the same boat," Gibbs said. "We have to understand that ... what is good for one has to be also good for the other [emphasis added]

                Plainly, we are not all in the same boat. Gibbs has delivered the kiss of the death to Main Street. This phrase derives from Judas' identification of Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane. Jesus goes on to suffer The Passion, but working Americans are being crucified (sacrificed) this time around. In the Gospels, Judas' kiss is a betrayal.

                Only the oldest among you will remember the words of General Motors' CEO "Engine" Charlie Wilson in 1953.

                In his closed hearing on Jan. 15, 1953, Wilson defended his investments and his integrity, saying he never could have risen to the top of GM if he had been crooked. Sen. Robert Hendrickson, R-N.J., asked whether, given his investments in GM, he could make a decision that would hurt the company... [Wilson replied as follows]

                "I cannot conceive of one, because for years I thought what was good for our country was good for General Motors and vice versa. The difference did not exist. Our company is too big. It goes with the welfare of the country."

                Fast forward 56 years later. Try this quote on for size: "Asked whether he could make a decision that would hurt the company, CEO Stan O'Neal replied `I can not conceive of one, because for years I thought what was good for our country was good for Merrill Lynch and vice versa´." Just doesn't ring true, does it? A lot has changed since Charlie Wilson's day, and not much of it for the better from our perspective in 2009.

                Finance Versus Manufacturing

                Today the President got tough with General Motors and Chrysler, Bloomberg, March 30, 2009).

                President Barack Obama said General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC. must survive without becoming “wards of the state” and the companies have one last, limited chance to “fundamentally restructure.”

                ...“We cannot and must not, and we will not let our auto industry simply vanish,” the president said at the White House, announcing new and final deadlines for the No. 1 and No. 3 U.S. automakers to remake themselves [but] “we cannot continue to excuse poor decisions. We cannot make the survival of our auto industry dependent on an unending flow of taxpayer dollars.”

                Obama is adamant that General Motors and Chrysler should not become "wards of the state." And what of an unending flow of taxpayer dollars? And poor decision-making? This all sounds very familiar. Where have we heard this before?

                In his description of America's rebirth as a Banana Republic, Simon Johnson touches on the expansion of finance in recent decades.

                The financial industry has not always enjoyed such favored treatment. But for the past 25 years or so, finance has boomed, becoming ever more powerful. The boom began with the Reagan years, and it only gained strength with the de-regulatory policies of the Clinton and George W. Bush administrations....

                Not surprisingly, Wall Street ran with these opportunities. From 1973 to 1985, the financial sector never earned more than 16 percent of domestic corporate profits. In 1986, that figure reached 19 percent. In the 1990s, it oscillated between 21 percent and 30 percent, higher than it had ever been in the postwar period. This decade, it reached 41 percent. Pay rose just as dramatically...

                Johnson is right about the influence of the banks, but Wall Street's galling takeover of our economy (Figure 1) is not the whole story.


                Figure 1 — Taken from How might the current financial crisis shape financial sector regulation and structure? by Már Gudmundsson, Deputy Head of the Monetary and Economic Department of the Bank for International Settlements. Also shown are similar rises in Japan and some EU countries. This speech is worth reading.
                Gudmundsson's graph displays the growing share of GDP appropriated by what iTulip's Eric Janszen calls the FIRE economy (Finance, Insurance and Real Estate). This alarming growth came at the expense of manufacturing in the United States. The following passage is taken from Manufacturing continues to shrink as a percentage of U.S. economic activity. The analysis was done in 2006 at the height of the madness.

                Manufacturing's share of the U.S. economy continues its 50-year decline. Last year, manufacturing GDP fell to an all-time low of just 12 percent of the economy, according to a Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI analysis of recent data from the Commerce Department.

                "Both major segments of manufacturing--durable and nondurable industries--declined," according to MAPI. Durable manufacturing accounted for 7 percent of the economy last year, down from 9.2 percent in 1995. Nondurable manufacturing fell to just 5 percent of the economy, from 6.7 percent in 1995.

                Manufacturing represented only 12% of GDP while the categories finance and insurance taken together with real estate, rental and leasing3 million manufacturing jobs between 1998 and 2003.

                The BEA's final revision indicates that U.S. GDP fell 6.3% in the final quarter of 2008. How did manufacturing fare over the entire year?

                According to the measure of profits before tax with inventory valuation adjustment, domestic profits of financial and non-financial corporations decreased in 2008. The decrease in non-financial corporations reflected decreases in all industries shown. The largest decrease was in manufacturing, and within manufacturing, the largest decreases were in “other” durable goods and in motor vehicles. [emphasis added]

                President Obama rightly says that "we will not let our auto industry simply vanish," but he continues to coddle finance while chastising the car companies for making poor decisions. The now decrepit state of the auto industry is not just a result of their own mismanagement or the strength of the UAW—it is mostly a direct result of "poor" decisions made by bloated plutocrats on Wall Street. Greed-driven, non-productive investments in credit derivatives have now brought down Main Street, which binged on all the new credit the banks made available.

                GM did not make bad or the wrong cars in recent years. However we view it, the domestic automakers gave the people what they wanted. Dubious enterprises like GMAC dispensed loads of credit to grease the wheels. At least General Motors made something instead of selling AAA-rated collateralized debt obligations based on pools of lousy mortgages.

                In his State of Union speech, the president asserted that "new plug-in hybrids roll off our assembly lines, but they will run on batteries made in Korea." Those new Chevy Volts aren't rolling off our assembly lines yet, but they will certainly have batteries made by LG Chem of South Korea if and when they do. But who will buy them? What is the prognosis for domestic car sales?

                How is Main Street Doing?

                President Obama laid out guarantees for car buyers in his speech on the fate of automakers.

                “If you buy a car from Chrysler or General Motors, you will be able to get your car serviced and repaired, just like always,” President Obama said during a speech from the White House. “Your warranty will be safe. In fact, it will be safer than it’s ever been, because starting today, the United States government will stand behind your warranty.”

                "If you buy a car anytime this year, you may be able to deduct the cost of any sales and excise taxes," the president promised.

                "We are working intensively with the auto finance companies to increase the flow of credit to both consumers and dealers," Obama pledged.

                How are car sales doing? Economist James Hamilton, who appreciates the role of an ever-diminishing manufacturing sector in America's economic health, gave us his latest update on March 8, 2009.


                Figure 2 — Taken from Hamilton's excellent Econbrowser blog. Sales in the first two months of 2009 were approximately half of what they were in 2004. The good years were 2004-2007.
                Why are cars sales in the dumper? Listening to the president, you might assume that only a weak flow of credit is preventing brisk new car sales. Once illiquid—not insolvent—banks start making loans again, everything will be fine as auto sales just pick up where they left off a few years ago.

                The president's story is seriously incomplete. It's as though he has blinders on, but we know the reason why. Obama can only see the credit extension problem on Wall Street, not the debt obligation problem on Main Street. Pictures tell part of the story. I will rely on some data posted by Calculated Risk based on the Fed's 2008 Q4 Flow of Funds report. (See Flow of Funds Q4 2008: Debt Deflation confirmation - Eric Janszen)


                Figure 3 — From Calculated Risk. Annotated to reflect his comment: "This is the Households and Nonprofit Net Worth as a percent of GDP.This includes real estate and financial assets (stocks, bonds, pension reserves, deposits, etc) net of liabilities (mostly mortgages). This ratio was relatively stable for almost 50 years, and then ... bubbles!" A FIRE economy can not "thrive" without bubbles.

                Figure 4 — Taken from Tim Iacono's Seeking Alpha report on March 12, 2009. Bubbly total household assets are now starting to revert back to their pre-2002 level. How far will they fall in 2009?

                Figure 5 — From Calculated Risk. His comment: "This graph shows household real estate assets and mortgage debt as a percent of GDP. Household assets as a percent of GDP is now declining rapidly. Mortgage debt as a percent of GDP was up slightly in Q4, and is only declining slowly. It's an old lesson: Assets values can fall quickly, but debt lingers!" [emphasis added]
                These graphs show the staggering loss of wealth in American households. This trend is far from complete. Today's Case-Shiller index of house values in 20 cities dropped a record 19% year-over-year in January, 2009. (Economic indicators lag the present.) U.S. News & World Report posted a story about wealth losses in 2008.

                The numbers from the Fed's Flow of Funds report for the fourth quarter are ugly:
                1. The showstopper in today's report was the larger-than-expected $5.1 trillion decline in household net worth. The 9% decline in wealth was easily the largest on record and pushes the much-watched wealth-to-income ratio for the household sector down to 4.83, the lowest since 95Q1.
                2. Since peaking in the second quarter of 2007, household wealth is down almost $13 trillion. Given where the S&P500 is now (around 740) and recent house price data, we estimate consumers have lost about another $2.5 trillion in the first quarter of the year.

                These numbers are absolute death for workers who are more and more dependent on assets rather than incomes for long-term wealth building. This is why the White House can't dismiss the stock market as some sort of mere tracking poll. In terms of wealth destruction, this downturn is already like a half a Great Depression. [emphasis added. Assets rather than wages have been important to workers because real wages have been flat for most of the last decade.]

                To make a long story short, people bought cars (and houses) in large numbers between 2004-2007 because they felt rich. Now all that inflated paper wealth is dwindling away as house and stock market prices continue to fall, despite the recent dead cat bounce in the Dow and S&P 500. Most alarmingly, Figure 5 demonstrates that "asset values can fall quickly but debt lingers!"

                Americans are thus increasingly squeezed between their declining net worth and their overlarge debt. At what rate will they be buying new cars, let alone those made domestically, in the future? The outlook does not look good. There are a lot of fairly new cars out there that don't have to be replaced for years. And if you absolutely have to have one, you can always buy something used. Even a restructured General Motors will have trouble surviving as sales tumble in the short-term and remain low for several years to come. It is hard to see how Obama's sales pitch will work if Americans follow their own best interests.

                These are the real consequences for manufacturing in an out-of-control FIRE economy. It will not be possible to pile more debt upon too much debt to jump start the economy. Americans must pay off their debt before any new spending spree can begin again. General Motors may need life-support for several years if they are to stay in business. If we had given them even half the money (after a bankruptcy and restructuring) that has been laundered through AIG to its counter-parties the banks since last September, that would have been a good start—if you want to ever see a $40,000 Chevy Volt, that is.

                Liquid Fuels Efficiency in a Prolonged Downturn

                The downturn on Main Street accompanying our maintenance of a FIRE economy also has severe consequences for U.S. energy policy.The saving grace for Obama's administration is that global oil demand will likely stay low for several years.

                Unfortunately, so will oil prices. Where is the incentive to buy those pricey Chevy Volts (with their Korean batteries) when they start rolling off our assembly lines? iTulip takes a particularly grim view of the timing of new alternative energy projects (Figure 6).

                Figure 6 — iTulip's prediction for an alternative energy bull market.
                On this view, even if large-scale 2nd-generation biofuels production from cellulosic feedstocks were technically and logistically feasible—it's not and might never be—we would not see that production until at least 2020 based on the shaky economy alone.

                In Steve Chu's Energy Miscalculations, I demonstrated that Energy Secretary Chu's vision for increased liquid fuels efficiency in the U.S. depends almost entirely on higher CAFE standards. A prolonged downturn poses many problems for an already inadequate strategy.
                • If few are buying new cars, which lowers the turnover rate for a fleet of 250 million vehicles, CAFE standards have much weaker effects on fuel efficiency over time.
                • New technology companies who want to make HEV or PHEV vehicles will be hesitant to enter a very slow global market.
                • Even when new companies do start-up, sales for new types of products (like PHEVs) always follow an S-shaped curve. Thus achieving significant market penetration would take more than a decade even without a depressed economy. (See my Energy Miscalculations.)

                Now deposed GM CEO Rick Wagoner is aware of the problems.

                Wagoner hinted that government may want to consider designing new negative incentives for consumers to purchase highly fuel-efficient vehicles.

                He noted that hybrid sales have fallen off a cliff this year due to the relatively high price of hybrid automobiles and the low price of fuel. "Consumers don't have an incentive themselves" to purchase vehicles that stray from the traditional petroleum model, said Wagoner, and he pointed to Europe as an example of governments creating incentives for consumers. (In Western Europe, government taxes push gas prices past $5 per gallon.)

                In a prolonged downturn, it will surely be impossible to stimulate spending by means of "negative incentives" like raising gasoline taxes. That would just make a bad situation worse.

                The central dogma of every government since Jimmie Carter—ever-greater debt fueling economic growth—is dead. We can not overlay too much debt with more debt—it is not turtles all the way down. We can not buy new cars we can not afford. Sorry, Mr. President, even you can not resurrect the dead.

                See also:
                USA, Inc. Common Shares: Long or Short?
                Debt brings down venerable manufacturing firms, right on schedule - Eric Janszen
                Pop goes the Globaloney Economy - Eric Janszen

                Dave Cohen writes for The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas (ASPO-USA). Contact the author at dave.aspo@gmail.com

                (Photo credit: gomichild)

                iTulip Select: The Investment Thesis for the Next Cycle™
                __________________________________________________

                To receive the iTulip Newsletter or iTulip Alerts, Join our FREE Email Mailing List

                Copyright © iTulip, Inc. 1998 - 2009 All Rights Reserved

                All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Nothing appearing on this website should be considered a recommendation to buy or to sell any security or related financial instrument. iTulip, Inc. is not liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. Full Disclaimer
                The good news is that we're fucked!

                The bad news is there's plenty more where that came from.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: FIRE Economy turns turtle

                  I have just read the linked article at the BIS concerning regulation

                  http://www.bis.org/speeches/sp081119.htm

                  Quote
                  The current financial crisis was triggered by increasing defaults on subprime mortgages and the turn of the housing cycle in the United States

                  And there I was thinking that it was due to the dismantling of existing regulation like Glass / Steagal and the fradulent packaging of these loans into derivatives which also would have been illegal up to the late nineties until Rubin, Summers and co. dismantled said legisilation for the benefit of their friends in Goldmans and elsewhere



                  Quote
                  Let me end by saying that the financial industry and its regulators face big challenges. The regulatory weaknesses that came to the fore during the crisis need to be fixed. This is also an opportunity to reduce the procyclical tendencies in the financial system and its regulatory framework.

                  I think I have heard this some where before! was this not the same reasoning for the establishment of the FED? Can not wait to see what they offer us this time round to reduce "the procyclical tendencies"
                  "that each simple substance has relations which express all the others"

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: FIRE Economy turns turtle

                    Originally posted by FRED View Post

                    The downturn on Main Street accompanying our maintenance of a FIRE economy also has severe consequences for U.S. energy policy.The saving grace for Obama's administration is that global oil demand will likely stay low for several years.

                    Unfortunately, so will oil prices.
                    Interesting viewpoint FRED. It's quite divergent from itulip's past prognostications. EJ has said prior that he felt commodity and oil prices would not stay low for long in interviews. Also, you recently said that oil investment would be a central tenant in your new allocation update. How do these two sentiments jive with the above statement?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: FIRE Economy turns turtle

                      Probably not significant, but interesting. As soon as I saw the Total Household Net Worth as % of GDP curve, it's similarity to DJIA curve striked me, and so I compared. The years of tops and bottoms match in both.

                      For some reason could not upload the image file, hence attached the word doc.
                      Attached Files

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: FIRE Economy turns turtle

                        Originally posted by don View Post
                        Can FIRE change its Nature :rolleyes:



                        The Fire Scorpion needed to cross the river. He had no chance on his own.



                        The turtle, nearby, crossed the river every day.



                        "Turtle, can you carry me to the other side?"



                        "No', said the turtle, "you will sting me when my head is exposed."



                        The fire scorpion assured the turtle that would never happen.



                        The turtle, after a long deliberation, decided to take that chance.



                        Across the river they went, the turtle stretched out from his shell, swimming steadily toward the far shore.



                        The scorpion, true to his word, rode peacefully on the turtle's shell just behind his neck.



                        As they reached the far shore and the scorpion was out of danger, he struck the turtle a killing sting to the neck.



                        "Why", asked the dying turtle, "you promised me you wouldn't sting me."



                        "I know", said the scorpion, "but I couldn't help myself. You see by nature I'm a scorpion."


                        http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-P70hbHBdl0

                        1:02 minutes

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: FIRE Economy turns turtle

                          Originally posted by strittmatter View Post
                          Like the frozen credit analogy!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: FIRE Economy turns turtle

                            Originally posted by GRG55 View Post
                            "The low price of fuel" is not the only factor driving the sales volumes of hybrid cars, and it may not even be the most important factor.

                            USA hybrid vehicle sales fell off a cliff in 2008 months before the price of gasoline peaked, and have never come close to their all time peak of 45,000 units in May of 2007.

                            It may be that people just got smarter about it. I considered a hybrid when looking for a new car, but by my calculations the price of gas needed to be over $7 per gallon for it to make financial sense to pay the premium. My theory is that once the earlier adopters and environmentalists with a little extra dough made their purchases, there was not really that large a market for your average price-conscious consumer.
                            Cowards die many times before their deaths; the valiant never taste of death but once.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: FIRE Economy turns turtle

                              "In a prolonged downturn, it will surely be impossible to stimulate spending by means of "negative incentives" like raising gasoline taxes. That would just make a bad situation worse."

                              and yet thats the plan to raise taxes, raise taxes some more, and then raise them again...

                              what the gov't will not take upfront in higher taxes, they will do through the hidden tax of inflation...

                              ugggh

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X