PDA

View Full Version : Frequently asked questions, unusual data & facts


bart
07-31-08, 03:37 PM
<center>FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

</center> <center>... and some just plain interesting Q&A

</center> <center>

</center>


How is the CPI (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#cpi) calculated and what's wrong with it?



The offical government CPI FAQ (http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpifaq.htm) on how its calculated, etc.
Some of the issues we have with it under stating what is actually happening and the way its incorrectly calculated are:

It is frequently incorrectly called or promoted or understood as a cost-of-living index, and was not designed for that purpose.
Most taxes are not included.
Substitutions are done when something goes up. If beef goes up and chicken doesn't for example, chicken prices are used instead of beef prices.
On housing prices, something called "homeowners equivalent rent" is used even though over 2/3 of the people in the US live in a non-rented home, so any large increases in housing prices are not included.
On cars, used car prices are used instead of new car prices.
It does not attempt to measure a standard of living.
It does not address many changes in health care, quality changes in products included, water and air quality, crime levels, consumer safety, or educational quality to name a few.
Political bias exists to keep it lower than actual since many government payments are based on it.
Various other statistical errors and biases.
See hedonics (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#hedonics), which also applies.
Comparison of CPI rates before & after Boskin Commission (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#boskin) changes were implemented, courtesy of Financial Sense (http://www.financialsense.com/). http://www.nowandfutures.com/images/cpi_before_and_after_boskin_commission_061805cpi.g if
For a much more detailed discussion of this issue, see The Core Rate (http://www.financialsense.com/stormwatch/2005/0624.html).
One specific from June 2005 statistics; the CPI component for gasoline showed a 6.9% increase since June 2004, while the actual retail price was up well over 20%.




(last update mid 2005)



How does one know when to sell during a mania (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#mania)?



Study past manias to help identify them. See the false data (http://www.nowandfutures.com/false_data.html#mania) page for examples.
Notice that prices usually go almost vertical in the last stage.
Notice that at the peak "everybody" thinks its a sure thing.
Notice that they can go far beyond what any rational interpretation would allow.
Use technical analysis (http://www.nowandfutures.com/investing.html#ta) and especially trend lines (http://www.nowandfutures.com/investing.html#trend_lines) on a price chart that represents the item.
For U.S. housing for example, the Philadelphia Housing Index (http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.web?c=%24hgx) and the Dow Jones REIT Index (http://stockcharts.com/def/servlet/SC.web?c=$djr,uu%5Bm,a%5Ddaclyyay%5Bpb50%21b200%5D %5Bvc60%5D%5BiUb14%21La12,26,9%5D&pref=G) work for us.
When the item jumps the amount of the low from which the run started in a single month, week, and then finally a single day, it's very close to the end.


How does one identify a mania?



Extremes of popular, positive investor sentiment–the general belief that the price can only go up.
Core Beliefs that are based on fact, such as the value of the Internet during the Internet bubble, that drive early adopters into the market.
Apocryphal Beliefs that are later invented by those who are benefiting the most from the bubble, such as investment banks and venture capital firms during the Internet bubble, but readily accepted by everyone else who is also benefiting–to explain extreme price increases that go far beyond the level justified by the Core Beliefs.
A well developed system of sales, marketing and distribution, that includes the mainstream press, and employs an army of analysts, consultants, lawyers, accountants, and so on, all of whom adopt first the Core Beliefs and later buy into the Apocryphal Beliefs.
A duration that exceeds the warnings of bubble spotters by months or even years.

(from Eric Jantzen, itulip.com in this (http://www.itulip.com/forums/showthread.php?t=507) post)


How are markets manipulated?

From a Technical Analysis (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#ta) view, the following 50 year old quote from R.W. Schabacker, the father of modern technical analysis, applies in showing how the public can be manipulated. This is also known as chart painting (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#chart_painting).
"Insiders and professionals are by no means unaware of the growing public interest and education in chart theories and patterns. In normal trading there are certainly not enough chart traders to make it worthwhile for the professionals to play against them instead of against the general public, but we have learned that the professionals must play against someone in order to make money. It is quite conceivable, therefore, that the insiders might take a ‘crack’ at chart traders now and then by manipulating false patterns in their campaign stocks, with the knowledge that, by arranging certain chart pictures, they could draw in a certain amount of buying or selling, as they chose, with a view to strengthening their own position."


The 7 factors required to develop a financial panic

Buoyant Growth, Systemic Architecture, Inadequate Safety Buffers, Adverse Leadership, Real Economic Shock, Fear and Greed, Failure of Collective Action.
Source - The Panoc of 1807 (http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/047015263X/thebigpictu09-20)


What are the purposes of the Federal Reserve's monetary policy?

"The Federal Reserve sets the nations monetary policy to promote the objectives of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long term interest rates."
Source (http://federalreserve.gov/pf/pdf/pf_2.pdf), main page here (http://www.federalreserve.gov/pf/pf.htm).


How about some basic & simple data on "peak oil"?



Peak oil does not mean running out of oil.
Peak oil does mean running out of 'inexpensive' oil.
The planet Earth does have limited resources (they're not infinite in other words).
Peak oil does mean that the total world production of oil has occured or will occur.
Oil companies can do nothing about increasing the actual quantity of oil available in planet Earth.
Oil companies are neither 100% black or evil nor 100% white or good.
In 1956, the geologist/geophysicist King Hubbert predicted that U.S. oil production would peak in the early 1970's.
U.S. oil production peaked in 1971.
In 1956, the geologist/geophysicist King Hubbert predicted that *world* oil production would peak in roughly the period 2005-2010.
Many facts are in dispute. Some facts are just plain unavilable and some are subject to significant "spin".
Doing nothing is equivalent to betting against Hubbert.





How is money created in the U.S.?

First, don't expect an easy answer. Also, don't expect that it is a fully sane or believable process either. Some of the answers below are deceptively simple, don't necessarily expect to understand them quickly.

The system of fractional reserve banking (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#fractional_reserve).
The Federal Reserve, by virtue of its ability to set certain interest rates, can encourage or discourage borrowing and therefore affect item #1.
The Federal Reserve doing open market operations (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#open_market_operation).
Banks and the U.S. Treasury borrowing from the Federal Reserve via the Discount Rate (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#discount_rate) or the Fed Funds Rate (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#fed_funds_rate), and the Federal Reserve creates the money via a book keeping entry. Then #1 above applies. When the U.S. Treasury receives money from the Federal Reserve, this is usually also known as "monetizing the debt" (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#monetize).
The Federal Reserve can also affect banks needs for funds via changes in reserve requirements (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#reserve_requirements), directly causing an effect on the fractional reserve system. Note that bank reserves plus currency in circulation is tracked by the monetary base (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#base).
Via tools such as the buying and selling of repos (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#repos) they can affect short term supply of and demand for money, and thereby affect #1.
Loopholes in banking laws and regulations allow certain types of lending and borrowing actions that are not subject to reserve requirements (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#reserve_requirements) or reporting or oversight, so money can be created easily and in large quantities by simply moving it around in the financial system.

Government sponsored entities such as Fannie Mae (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#fannie_mae) borrow money very cheaply and then lend it out. They act similarly to a bank and item #1 applies again.
(If you're really a economics masochist and have to know details of how this is done, see Doug Noland's work here (http://www.safehaven.com/article-194.htm). It's called Money Market Fund Intermediation.)
There are many other financial companies and entities and even financial instruments that act similarly to Fannie Mae.
(If you just have to know... and we really don't recommend mentally abusing yourself and also leave it up to you to find definitions and understanding but... some of them are captive finance companies such as GE Capital, Wall Street brokerage houses, credit swaps, hedge fund activities, and other quite sophisticated and complex instruments like CDOs, asset or mortgage backed securities, and SPEs. These items all fall under the general term derivatives (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#derivative).)
An "outside" and indirect source, is central banks of other countries like Japan. They print their own money, and then use it to directly buy dollar denominated items from the Federal Reserve, or directly buy assets from other U.S. financial institutions.
Organizations like the FHLB (http://www.fdic.gov/about/learn/advisorycommittee/fhlb_advances.html) and others are far off the beaten path but do create money.


Per the Humphrey Hawkins Act (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#hh), "the Fed has the authority to buy foreign government debt, as well as domestic government debt. Potentially, this class of assets offers huge scope for Fed operations, as the quantity of foreign assets eligible for purchase by the Fed is several times the stock of U.S. government debt."
Source of the quote is a November 2002 speech by Ben Bernanke of the Fed, located here (http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2002/20021121/default.htm).
There also exist some unusual and limited abilities of the Fed to directly buy certain short term financial instruments from the banks (source (http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2002/20021121/default.htm#fn12)) to soften a crisis and aid banking liquidity (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#liquidity).
Note that the actual currency (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#currency) is printed by the US Treasury, and only distributed by the Federal Reserve System. Total currency is less than 5% of the grand total of all dollars everywhere.

There may be other ways, but that's all we're currently aware of. They also exclude any unproven manipulation theories that exist about the Fed (see our glossary about the ESF (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#esf) or PPT (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#ppt) for data about non Fed related entities).

One last point and it's mildly political. The U.S. Constitution states "The Congress shall have Power To ... coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures", so that's the source. The Federal Reserve System was created by Congress by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, but the Federal Reserve Banks are not part of the government in spite of their name. It's a private corporation, but does at least report to Congress frequently.
(last update Nov. 2005)


How is money destroyed?

One simple way is via investment losses. The US stock market lost about $7 trillion in total value between 2000 and late 2002, and that $7 trillion was actually destroyed as of late 2002. Note that this assumes the general definition of money here (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#).

Another would be if the Fed, during an open market operation (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#open_market_operation), sold bonds in the Federal Reserve accounts back to the US Treasury without buying at least as many as they sold. Remember that when the Fed buys bonds from the Treasury during an open market operation, that creates money out of virtually thin air.

Another is losses in the banking system itself. An example is the Saving & Loan crises in the early 1990s when there were huge losses recognized by a number of Savings & Loan associations who had hugely overextended themselves - much of that money just disappeared.

If the Federal Reserve had not stepped in and provided support, the LTCM crisis (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LTCM) in 1998 would also have destroyed a lot. Another is likely going on in early 2005 in Fannie Mae, due to some "special moments" in their accounting and financial actions since the late 1990s.

Warren Buffett, the second richest man in the world after Bill Gates, has warned repeatedly over the last few years about the dangers of derivatives (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#derivative), and a problem there could easily destroy many many billions.

This is not a complete list. It is just intended as examples.
(last update mid 2005)



What is debt deflation?

Debt-Deflation
Thus governments strained their muscles to balance their budgets--thus further depressing demand--and to reduce wages and prices--in order to restore "competitiveness" and balance to their economies. In Germany the Chancellor--the Prime Minister--Heinrich Bruening decreed a ten percent cut in prices, and a ten to fifteen percent cut in wages. But every step taken in pursuit of financial orthodoxy made matters worse.
For once the declines in wages and prices in the Great Depression had passed some critical value, they knocked the economy out of its normal business-cycle pattern. Severe deflation had consequences that were much more than an amplification of the modest five to ten percent falls in prices that had been seen in past depressions.
When banks make loans, they allow beforehand for some measure of fluctuation in the value of the assets pledged as security for their loans: even some diminuation of the value of their collateral will not cause banks to panic, because if the borrower defaults they will still be able to recover their loan principal as long as the decline in the value of the collateral is not too high.
But what happens when deflation reaches the previously never seen amount of thirty, forty, or fifty percent--as it did in the Great Depression? Banks become keenly aware that their loan principal is no longer safe: that if the borrower defaults, they no longer have recourse to sufficient collateral to recover their loan principal. if the borrower defaults, and if bank depositors take the default as a signal that it is time for them to withdraw their deposits, the bank collapses.
As Keynes, wrote, once banks realize that deflation has significantly impaired the value of their collateral: ...they become particularly anxious that the remainder of their assets should be as liquid and as free from risk as it is possible to make them. This reacts in all sorts of silent and unobserved ways on new enterprise. for it means that banks are less willing than they would normally be to finance any project...
In looking at the tracks of interest rates in the Great Depression, you can see a steady widening of the gap between safe interest rates on government securities and the interest rates that borrowing companies had to pay. Even though credit was ample--in the sense that borrowers with perfect and unimpaired collateral could obtain loans at extremely low interest rates--the businesses in the economy (few of which had perfect and unimpaired collateral) found it next to impossible to obtain capital to finance investment.
Thus the banking system freezes up. It no longer performs its social function of channeling purchasing power from savers to investors. As a result private investment collapses; falling investment produces more unemployment, excess capacity, futher falls in prices, and more deflation; and further deflation renders the banking system even more insolvent.
Morever, not only past deflation but also expected future deflation depresses investment. Why invest now if you expect deflation, so that everything you would buy this year will be ten percent cheaper next year?
In the end the spiral of deflation will continue to depress the economy until something is done to restore solvency to the banking system, and break the anticipations of further falls in prices. A few economists understood this process at work during the Great Depression--Irving Fisher, John Maynard Keynes, R.G. Hawtrey--but they did not walk the corridors of power at the nadir of the Great Depression.
Source (http://econ161.berkeley.edu/TCEH/Slouch_Crash14.html)


Is there any truth to the North American Union (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#nau) and the Amero (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#amero)?

Well, here's (http://www.spp.gov/) the very off most folk's radar US government site, showing its progress and status. Both Mexico and Canada are actively participating.


What can the Fed buy and sell in its Open Market Operations?

Section 14 of the Federal Reserve Act––Selected Passages Authorizing Purchases in the Open Markets SECTION 14--OPEN MARKET OPERATIONS

Purchase and Sale of Cable Transfers, Bank Acceptances and Bills of Exchange Any Federal reserve bank may, under rules and regulations prescribed by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, purchase and sell in the open market, at home or abroad, either from or to domestic or foreign banks, firms, corporations, or individuals, cable transfers and bankers' acceptances and bills of exchange of the kinds and maturities by this Act made eligible for rediscount, with or without the indorsement of a member bank. Dealings In, and Loans On, Gold

Every Federal reserve bank shall have power:

(a) To deal in gold coin and bullion at home or abroad, to make loans thereon, exchange Federal reserve notes for gold, gold coin, or gold certificates, and to contract for loans of gold coin or bullion, giving therefor, when necessary, acceptable security, including the hypothecation of United States bonds or other securities which Federal reserve banks are authorized to hold; Purchase and Sale of Obligations of United States, States, Counties, etc., and of Foreign Governments

(b)(1) To buy and sell, at home or abroad, bonds and notes of the United States, bonds issued under the provisions of subsection (c) of section 4 of the Home Owners' Loan Act of 1933, as amended, and having maturities from date of purchase of not exceeding six months, and bills, notes, revenue bonds, and warrants with a maturity from date of purchase of not exceeding six months, issued in anticipation of the collection of taxes or in anticipation of the receipt of assured revenues by any State, county, district, political subdivision, or municipality in the continental United States, including irrigation, drainage and reclamation districts, and obligations of, or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by, a foreign government or agency thereof, such purchases to be made in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, any bonds, notes, or other obligations which are direct obligations of the United States or which are fully guaranteed by the United States as to the principal and interest may be bought and sold without regard to maturities but only in the open market.

(2) To buy and sell in the open market, under the direction and regulations of the Federal Open Market Committee, any obligation which is a direct obligation of, or fully guaranteed as to principal and interest by, any agency of the United States. Purchase and Sale of Bills of Exchange

(c) To purchase from member banks and to sell, with or without its indorsement, bills of exchange arising out of commercial transactions, as hereinbefore defined.



How about some hard facts about this Avian Flu thing?

Fast facts about avian influenza (December 2005) (http://www.grist.org/news/counter/2005/12/08/avianflu/index.html?source=daily)


What are the top five currencies in the world, ranked by amount in circulation in 2004?



Euro
U.S. dollar
Japanese Yen
China
United Kingdom

How about the population top ten?



China - 1,306.3
India - 1,080.3
European Union - 457.0
United States - 295.7
Indonesia - 241.9
Brazil - 186.1
Pakistan - 162.4
Bangladesh - 144.3
Russia - 143.4
Nigeria - 128.7

Numbers in millions - July 2005 estimates, CIA factbook


What is the Communist Manifesto anyhow?



Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
Centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country.
Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production.




What are cognitive biases?

Many of these biases are studied for how they affect belief formation and business decisions and scientific research.


Bandwagon effect — the tendency to do (or believe) things because many other people do (or believe) the same. Related to groupthink, herd behaviour, and manias.
Bias blind spot — the tendency not to compensate for one's own cognitive biases.
Choice-supportive bias — the tendency to remember one's choices as better than they actually were.
Confirmation bias — the tendency to search for or interpret information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions.
Congruence bias — the tendency to test hypotheses exclusively through direct testing, in contrast to tests of possible alternative hypotheses.
Contrast effect — the enhancement or diminishment of a weight or other measurement when compared with recently observed contrasting object.
Déformation professionnelle — the tendency to look at things according to the conventions of one's own profession, forgetting any broader point of view.
Endowment effect — "the fact that people often demand much more to give up an object than they would be willing to pay to acquire it".[1]
Focusing effect — prediction bias occurring when people place too much importance on one aspect of an event; causes error in accurately predicting the utility of a future outcome.
Hyperbolic discounting — the tendency for people to have a stronger preference for more immediate payoffs relative to later payoffs, the closer to the present both payoffs are.
Illusion of control — the tendency for human beings to believe they can control or at least influence outcomes that they clearly cannot.
Impact bias — the tendency for people to overestimate the length or the intensity of the impact of future feeling states.
Information bias — the tendency to seek information even when it cannot affect action.
Irrational escalation — the tendency to make irrational decisions based upon rational decisions in the past or to justify actions already taken.
Loss aversion — "the disutility of giving up an object is greater than the utility associated with acquiring it".[2] (see also sunk cost effects and Endowment effect).
Neglect of probability — the tendency to completely disregard probability when making a decision under uncertainty.
Mere exposure effect — the tendency for people to express undue liking for things merely because they are familiar with them.
Omission bias — The tendency to judge harmful actions as worse, or less moral, than equally harmful omissions (inactions).
Outcome bias — the tendency to judge a decision by its eventual outcome instead of based on the quality of the decision at the time it was made.
Planning fallacy — the tendency to underestimate task-completion times.
Post-purchase rationalization — the tendency to persuade oneself through rational argument that a purchase was a good value.
Pseudocertainty effect — the tendency to make risk-averse choices if the expected outcome is positive, but make risk-seeking choices to avoid negative outcomes.
Reactance - the urge to do the opposite of what someone wants you to do out of a need to reassert a perceived attempt to constrain your freedom of choice.
Selective perception — the tendency for expectations to affect perception.
Status quo bias — the tendency for people to like things to stay relatively the same (see also Loss aversion and Endowment effect).[3]
Von Restorff effect — the tendency for an item that "stands out like a sore thumb" to be more likely to be remembered than other items.
Zero-risk bias — preference for reducing a small risk to zero over a greater reduction in a larger risk.

Source (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases)


Do you have anything about the shadowy Bilderberger group that isn't from the extreme tinfoil hat brigade?

Here (http://www.caseyresearch.com/displayArchiveArticleWwnk.php?id=212), under the subhead "Global Movers and Shakers" is one of the better articles we've seen. It covers the 2006 meeting of the group in Canada.
This (http://viridia.org/2007/08/16/unconscious-conspiracies/) short blog entry also addresses the area of "Unconscious Conspiracies".


What are the official missions of various Central Banks?

Federal Reserve System(Fed)
"Promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates" Source (http://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/mishkin20070410a.htm)

European Central Bank (ECB)
"The main objective of the Eurosystem is to maintain price stability: safeguarding the value of the euro." Source (http://www.ecb.int/ecb/html/mission.en.html)




What do you have on conformity?

Asch's Conformity Experiment (http://www.overcomingbias.com/2007/12/aschs-conformit.html)


Do you have anything on conspiracies besides Bilderberger stuff?

"The only conspiracy that matters is the conspiracy of the psychopaths against the rest of us."
Twilight of the psychopaths (http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2008/01/02/02073.html)


Can we please have some perspective on deaths from various causes?



World War II, 55 million (U.S. share, about 400,000)
China - Mao Zedong (1949-1975), 40 million
Flu epidemic, 1918 - World wide, 30+ million which was 3% of the world population (estimates range from 20-100 million)(U.S. estimate is 600,000+)
HIV/AIDs - 21 million as of 2006
Russia - Stalin (1924-1953), 20 million
World War I, 15 million
Holocaust - about 6 million Jews (and many Christians, etc. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Christians) too)
Congo War, ended in 2002 - 3.8 million
Natural disasters - 1900-1999, 3.5 million (floods, earthquakes, volcanoes, etc. but not drought or famine)
Cambodia - Pol Pot (1975-1979), 1-2 million
Malaria - world yearly, 1+ million (out of 300+ million cases)
U.S. Civil War - about 600,000
Flu, World - yearly 500,000+
Prescription drugs - U.S. only, 120,000 per year (source - Death by Medicine, by Dr. Gary Null)
Vietnam war - U.S. only, 58 thousand (excludes the approximate 140 thousand suicides)
Auto accidents - U.S. 2004 total 42,636 (alcohol related - 16,694)
Flu, U.S. - yearly average 36,000
Suicide - U.S. yearly, 30 thousand (2000)
U.S. Revolutionary War - about 25,000
Guns - U.S. yearly, 15 thousand (about one every 35 minutes, in a population over 300 million - .00005% ) (32 thousand if suicides included) (1997) (Defensive Gun Use Study (http://www.gunsandcrime.org/dgufreq.html), a very under reported item)
9/11/2001 - approx. 3000
12/7/1941 Pearl Harbor - approx. 2400




<!--!-- http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warsusa.htm, http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat8.htm ----> How about a list of countries that have had hyperinflations (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#hyperinflation) since 1985?

<!-- http://www.dollardaze.org/blog/?post_id=00107&cat_id=17 -->

1982-1988, Mexico - 1000% (corrected in 1993 by a 1000:1 peso replacement)
1985, Bolivia - 12,000%
1989, Argentina - 3,000%
1990, Peru - 7,500%
1991-97, Russia - 700%
1993, Brazil - 2,100%
1993, Ukraine - 5,000%
1993-4, Yugoslavia - 1,000,000,000+% The Yugoslavian government's official position was that the hyperinflation occurred "because of the unjustly implemented sanctions against the Serbian people and state." (http://www2.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/hyper.htm#YUGO)
1999, Ecuador - 70%
2002, Argentina - 400%
2004, Zimbabwe - 133% (14 countries in 2004 had inflation rates over 15%)


(last update mid 2005)
The World’s Greatest Unreported Hyperinflation (http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=8232)


What are the worst four hyperinflations (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#hyperinflation) in the last 100 years?



Hungary, 1945-1946 - 41.9 quadrillion peak percent per month (prices doubled every 15 hours)
Yugoslavia, 10/1993-2/1994 - 5 quadrillion peak percent during the period (prices doubled every 18 hours)
Greece, 1941-1944 - 8.5 billion paek percent per month (prices doubled every 28 hours)
Germany, 1921-1923 - 3.25 million percent per month at its peak (prices doubled every 49 hours)




What are some of the ways that governments disguise the true inflation rate?



Just plain reporting incorrect data about money supply, rate of money creation, economic growth - i.e., lying.
Ceasing the reporting of money supply or other important economic statistics. See here (http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h6/discm3.htm) for an example.
Altering how statistics like a Consumer Price Index are calculated (see above (http://www.nowandfutures.com/faq.html#cpi)).
Inventing concepts like a "core" Consumer Price Index, which excludes essential things like food and energy.
Wage & price controls
Favoring or encouraging redefinition of words like inflation to exclude major assets or goods from its definition.
International currency controls, which make it more difficult to move money out of a country.
Savings laws, designed to force people to hold money and not spend. Those will artifically and temporarily lower apparent inflation. Examples are war bonds, patriotic appeals, encouraging emergency funds, temporary taxes to discourage consumption, and the "Whip Inflation Now" program of U.S. President Ford in the mid 1970s.
Adding limitations to a right to freely buy or sell specific items (the general case of wage & price controls or international currency controls).
Public Relations programs to encourage incorrect, incomplete or deceptive media reporting.




What are some of the next probable financial issues or crises?

Under funded pension plans.

June 7, 2005 – Washington Post (Albert B. Crenshaw): “Although the financial markets have been on the upswing recently from their post-boom low, many of the nation's private pension plans have been sinking deeper into the hole, according to new figures from the government's pension insurance agency. The 1,108 weakest pension plans -- those whose assets are at least $50 million below the value of the benefits they promise -- were short by an aggregate $353.7 billion at the end of last year, figures from the government’s Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. show. That was 27 percent more than the shortfall a year earlier, contrary to the hopes of many that funding would improve as the economy strengthens.”

N.Y. Times article 1 (http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/30/magazine/30pensions.html?pagewanted=all)
N.Y. Times article 2 (http://www.truthout.org/docs_2005/printer_091905O.shtml)

A little perspective on global liquidity, please?

We thought this was an excellent broad picture of it, although the terms used in the chart aren't very well known. Most are in our glossary though.
http://www.nowandfutures.com/download/global_liquidity_pyramid.jpg


Medicaid drug bill

The Medicaid drug bill due to go into effect in January 2006 is part of the the overall massive problem with US budget deficits and government spending. It is estimated to cost about $150-200 billion per year. Add in $150+ billion of off budget spending for Iraq, another probable $150+ billion for Katrina and other hurricanes, the existing $350+ billion official deficit and the longer term outlook for inflation and the strength of the US dollar becomes less than optimistic.

Derivatives

Warren Buffett, the second wealthiest man in the U.S., has stated that derivatives (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#derivative)are the WMD of financial markets. Also see "The Derivative Conundrum" (http://www.nowandfutures.com/sinclair_open_letter.html) by Jim Sinclair, his letter to the Chairman of the Federal Reserve warning about the area. (Derivative definition) (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#derivative)

Alternative Minimum Tax

Another that has received little coverage in any of the media is changes in how the alternative minimum tax (AMT) will be implemented starting in 2006. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that it will affect an additional 20-25 million tax returns between 2006-2010, and is expected to raise about $80 billion in revenues. It will more than offset any of the tax breaks enacted in the years since 9/11.
(last update mid 2005)


Is there a counterpoint to the CERA report bashing 'peak oil'?

Right here (http://www.theoildrum.com/story/2006/11/15/83857/186).


What nations have the most popular brands?



Australia
Canada
Switzerland
UK
Sweden
Italy
Germany
Netherlands
France
New Zealand
United States
Spain
Ireland
Japan
Brazil
Mexico
Egypt
India
Poland
South Korea
China
South Africa
Czech Republic
Russia
Turkey


Source: GMI Poll (http://www.gmi-mr.com/gmipoll/), August 2005
Top brands of 2005 (http://www.brandchannel.com/boty_results/global_2005.html)


What was it like right before the Great Depression?

Here (http://www.nowandfutures.com/download/OughtToBeRich.pdf) is a short two page article from the August 1929 issue of "Ladies Home Journal", a publication not exactly known for investment advice, entitled "Everybody ought to be rich". (requires Adobe Acrobat to display)
Also, here (http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/crash/filmmore/pt.html) is a PBS transcipt of their show "The Crash of 1929".


What would the Fed do during a crisis with Fannie Mae or any GSE (http://www.nowandfutures.com/glossary.html#gse)?

"Under Section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act, Federal Reserve Banks have the authority to discount paper for individuals, partnerships or corporations. Direct lending to the GSEs would have to come under provisions of this part of the Federal Reserve Act. Critical provisions include a finding of unusual and exigent circumstances and an affirmative vote of not less than five members of the Board of Governors. The loans would have to be fully collateralized." Source: Panel on Government Sponsored Enterprises (http://www.stlouisfed.org/news/speeches/2004/05_06_04.html)


Nuclear power, good or bad or in between?

Some good and useful data at Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_waste) on the radioactive waste issue, and a good overview of nuclear power in France (http://www.uic.com.au/nip28.htm), who produce over 75% of their electric power via nuclear plants and have done so for decades.


CEO Pay vs. the Average Employee?

"In 1982, the ratio between chief executives and the average employee was 42:1. In 2004, the ratio of the average CEO pay to that of the average non-management worker in the US was 431:1."
Source: Speech by SEC Commissioner Roel C. Campos, Feb. 13th 2006 (http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/spch021306rcc.htm)


Is Earth safe?

Two answers - No, and it varies over time regarding safety.

More than 2.5 billion people were affected by floods, earthquakes, hurricanes and other natural disasters between 1994 and 2003, a 60 percent increase over the previous two 10-year periods, U.N. officials reported at a conference on disaster prevention in January. Those numbers don't include millions displaced by last December 2004's tsunami, which killed an estimated 180,000 people as its monstrous waves swept over coastlines from Indonesia's Aceh province to Trincomalee, Sri Lanka, and beyond. By another measure -- property damage -- 2004 was the costliest year on record for global insurers, who paid out more than $40 billion on natural disasters, reports German insurance giant Munich Re. Florida's quartet of 2004 hurricanes was the big factor. But generally it's not that more "events" are happening, rather that more people are in the way, said Thomas Loster, a Munich Re expert. "More and more people are being hit," he said. One third of the world’s population lives within 100 km (about 62 miles) of the ocean – thirteen of the eighteen ‘mega cities’ in the world are by the sea.


What's with this tinfoil hat thing?

From the tongue-in-cheek department:

On the Effectiveness of Aluminium Foil Helmets (http://people.csail.mit.edu/rahimi/helmet/)
Mind control (http://eclectech.co.uk/mindcontrol.php)
Wikipedia entry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tin-foil+hat)
Buy one (http://www.ericisgreat.com/tinfoilhats/)


What are the 5 steps to persecute or shut down a group or idea?



Identify the group or idea
Marginalize it via various P.R., propaganda and other tools, including the redefinition of specific words
Vilify (make vicious and defamatory statements about) the group or idea
Make laws against it
Enforce the laws




Is it really worse now?



Movies "This new form of entertainment has gone far to blast maidenhood ... Depraved adults with candies and pennies beguile children with the inevitable result. The Society has prosecuted many for leading girls astray through these picture shows, but GOD alone knows how many are leading dissolute lives begun at the 'moving pictures.'"
- The Annual Report of the New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, 1909
Telephone "Does the telephone make men more active or more lazy? Does [it] break up home life and the old practice of visiting friends?"
- Survey conducted by the Knights of Columbus Adult Education Committee, San Francisco Bay Area, 1926
Comic books "Many adults think that the crimes described in comic books are so far removed from the child's life that for children they are merely something imaginative or fantastic. But we have found this to be a great error. Comic books and life are connected. A bank robbery is easily translated into the rifling of a candy store. Delinquencies formerly restricted to adults are increasingly committed by young people and children ... All child drug addicts, and all children drawn into the narcotics traffic as messengers, with whom we have had contact, were inveterate comic-book readers This kind of thing is not good mental nourishment for children!"
- Fredric Wertham, Seduction of the Innocent, 1954
War This war is a defensive war. It was forced upon us by our enemies, who wish to destroy our nation. The only thing we cannot afford to lose in this war is our freedom, the foundation of our life and our future. No one has the right to complain about limitations on his personal freedom caused by the war.

Why of course the people don’t want war. But it is the leaders who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.

-- Joseph Goebbels, Sept 1943 (source - http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/goeb45.htm) (http://www.calvin.edu/academic/cas/gpa/goeb45.htm)
Rock and Roll "The effect of rock and roll on young people, is to turn them into devil worshippers; to stimulate self-expression through sex; to provoke lawlessness; impair nervous stability and destroy the sanctity of marriage. It is an evil influence on the youth of our country."
- Minister Albert Carter, 1956
The Waltz "The indecent foreign dance called the Waltz was introduced ... at the English Court on Friday last ... It is quite sufficient to cast one's eyes on the voluptuous inter*twining of the limbs, and close com*pressure of the bodies ... to see that it is far indeed removed from the modest reserve which has hitherto been considered distinctive of English females. So long as this obscene display was con*fined to prostitutes and adulteresses, we did not think it deserving of notice; but now that it is ... forced on the respectable classes of society by the evil example of their superiors, we feel it a duty to warn every parent against exposing his daughter to so fatal a contagion."
- The Times of London, 1816
Novels "The free access which many young people have to romances, novels, and plays has poisoned the mind and corrupted the morals of many a promising youth; and prevented others from improving their minds in useful knowledge. Parents take care to feed their children with wholesome diet; and yet how unconcerned about the provision for the mind, whether they are furnished with salutary food, or with trash, chaff, or poison?"
- Reverend Enos Hitchcock, Memoirs of the Bloomsgrove Family, 1790
Lincoln on the Declaration of Independence [regarding the framers of the Declaration of Independence]: "These communities, by their representatives in old Independence Hall, said to the whole world of men: "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness." This was their majestic interpretation of the economy of the Universe. This was their lofty, and wise, and noble understanding of the justice of the Creator to His creatures. [Applause.] Yes, gentlemen, to all His creatures, to the whole great family of man. In their enlightened belief, nothing stamped with the Divine image and likeness was sent into the world to be trodden on, and degraded, and imbruted by its fellows. They grasped not only the whole race of man then living, but they reached forward and seized upon the farthest posterity. They erected a beacon to guide their children and their children's children, and the countless myriads who should inhabit the earth in other ages. Wise statesmen as they were, they knew the tendency of prosperity to breed tyrants, and so they established these great self-evident truths, that when in the distant future some man, some faction, some interest, should set up the doctrine that none but rich men, or none but white men, were entitled to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, their posterity might look up again to the Declaration of Independence and take courage to renew the battle which their fathers began -- so that truth, and justice, and mercy, and all the humane and Christian virtues might not be extinguished from the land; so that no man would hereafter dare to limit and circumscribe the great principles on which the temple of liberty was being built."
- Speech at Lewistown, Illinois, on August 17, 1858 (CWAL II:546)




What is the 'Doomsday Clock'?

The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists has informed the world what time it is since 1947, when its now-famous "Doomsday Clock" first appeared of the cover of the magazine. Since then, the minute hand of the clock has moved forward and back to reflect the global level of nuclear danger and the state of international security.

The full timeline (http://www.thebulletin.org/doomsday_clock/timeline.htm).
The current time (http://www.thebulletin.org/doomsday_clock/current_time.htm).
The Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doomsday_clock) entry.


Please list some unusual monetary "solutions"

Monetary Policy Alternatives at the Zero Bound
"An Empirical Assessment (non-technical summary page i) In this paper, we apply the tools of modern empirical finance to the recent Experiences of the United States and Japan to provide evidence on the potential Effectiveness of various nonstandard policies. Following Bernanke and Reinhart (2004), we group these policy alternatives into three classes: (1) using communications policies to shape public expectations about the future course of interest rates; (2) increasing the size of the central bank's balance sheet, or "quantitative easing"; and (3) changing the composition of the central bank's balance sheet through, for example, the targeted purchases of long-term bonds as a means of reducing the long-term interest rate."
Source (http://www.federalreserve.gov/pubs/feds/2004/200448/200448pap.pdf)



Is there a connection between economics, investing and psychiatry?

Some thoughts here (http://www.safehaven.com/showarticle.cfm?id=3996) on stimulus/response. A bit 'out there' but still food for thought.


What are the 7 Christian Virtues

Courage, prudence, justice, and temperance, plus the theological ones of faith, hope, and charity.
In more classical views, they are chastity (Latin, virtus), abstinence (Latin, frenum), liberality (Latin, liberalitas), diligence (Latin, industria), patience (Latin, patientia), kindness (Latin, humanitas) and humility (Latin, humilitas).


What are the 7 Christian Deadly Sins

The generally accepted deadly sins are superbia (hubris/pride), avaritia (avarice/greed), luxuria (extravagance, later lust), invidia (envy), gula (gluttony), ira (wrath), and acedia (sloth)




In the probably better known than left mysterious department, what would happen if a nuclear bomb hit your city?

This link (http://meyerweb.com/eric/tools/gmap/hydesim.html) only shows a limited number of specific U.S. cities, but if you know your longitude & latitude it will show your location. Find your longitude and latitude. (http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/%7Ecvm/latlon_find_location.html#city%20location)

To the best of our knowledge, "suitcase" nuclear devices are around 10 kiloton and the "average tactical nuclear bomb" is 100 kiloton. A kiloton is equivalent to 1000 tons of dynamite.



How about a quote from Hitler, early in his career?

"My feelings as a Christian points me to my Lord and Savior as a fighter. It points me to the man who once in loneliness, surrounded by a few followers, recognized these Jews for what they were and summoned men to fight against them and who, God's truth! was greatest not as a sufferer but as a fighter. In boundless love as a Christian and as a man I read through the passage which tells us how the Lord at last rose in His might and seized the scourge to drive out of the Temple the brood of vipers and adders. How terrific was His fight for the world against the Jewish poison. To-day, after two thousand years, with deepest emotion I recognize more profoundly than ever before the fact that it was for this that He had to shed His blood upon the Cross. As a Christian I have no duty to allow myself to be cheated, but I have the duty to be a fighter for truth and justice... And if there is anything which could demonstrate that we are acting rightly it is the distress that daily grows. For as a Christian I have also a duty to my own people."

--Adolf Hitler, in a speech on 12 April 1922 (Norman H. Baynes, ed. The Speeches of Adolf Hitler, April 1922-August 1939, Vol. 1 of 2, pp. 19-20, Oxford University Press, 1942)

Feel free to substitute any other group for the word "Jews" above. We think that doing that can add perspective, and frequently more truth, to any age or time.


What legal powers does the Federal Reserve actually have?

(long & technical)


The Federal Reserve Act specifically identifies the types of securities the central bank is allowed to buy and sell. These include Treasuries, agencies, short-duration municipal bonds, bankers’ acceptances, and gold (the US was under a gold standard when the Fed was established in 1913). After a long and contentious debate over its legality, the Fed in 1962 also "reinterpreted" Section 14 of the Federal Reserve Act as giving it the legal authority to buy and sell foreign currencies (see Robert L. Hetzel’s paper "Sterilized Foreign Exchange Intervention: The Fed Debate in the 1960s" in the spring 1996 issue of the Richmond Fed’s Economic Quarterly for background on the debate and legal arguments advanced by Fed and Treasury lawyers justifying currency intervention). Subsequently, in 1980, the Congress gave the Fed legal authority to invest the proceeds of foreign exchange operations in short-term foreign government bonds.

However, the Fed clearly has no legal authority to buy equities or corporate bonds, and no reasonable interpretation of the Federal Reserve Act would give them that right. Indeed, when the Fed began to consider changes to System Open Market Account (SOMA) procedures a couple of years ago in response to concerns about a shrinking supply of Treasuries, it acknowledged that a change in the law would be required to go beyond the securities listed above. In the interim, it investigated expanding its outright purchases to include GNMA MBS, and their repo operations, to include munis and foreign government bonds, because these securities were "assets that could be purchased under existing legal authority but were not currently authorized by the Committee" (see the January 2001 FOMC minutes). Moreover, in his February 2001 Humphrey-Hawkins testimony explaining the Fed's investigation of these possibilities, Fed Chairman Greenspan acknowledged that any further steps would require that the FOMC "request the Congress for a broadening of its statutory authority for acquiring assets via open market operations." Clearly, the Fed is a long way from having the legal authority to operate in equity markets. The conspiracy theorists are going to have to look elsewhere for an explanation of the recent market gyrations.

The relevant section of the Federal Reserve Act is as follows:

"Section 14. Any Federal reserve bank may, under rules and regulations prescribed by the Federal Reserve Board, purchase and sell in the open market, at home or abroad, either from or to domestic or foreign banks, firms, corporations, or individuals, cable transfers and bankers' acceptances and bills of exchange of the kinds and maturities by this Act made eligible for rediscount, with or without the endorsement of a member bank.

Every Federal reserve bank shall have power: (a) To deal in gold coin and bullion at home or abroad, to make loans thereon, exchange Federal reserve notes for gold, gold coin, or gold certificates, and to contract for loans of gold coin or bullion, giving therefor, when necessary, acceptable security, including the hypothecation of United States bonds or other securities which Federal reserve banks are authorized to hold; (b) to buy and sell, at home or abroad, bonds and notes of the United States, and bills, notes, revenue bonds, and warrants with a maturity date of purchase of not exceeding six months, issued in anticipation of the collection of taxes or in anticipation of the receipt of assured revenues by any State, county, district, political subdivision, or municipality in the continental United States, including irrigation, drainage, and reclamation districts, such purchases to be made in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by the Federal Reserve Board; (c) to purchase from member banks and to sell, with or without its endorsement, bills of exchange arising out of commercial transactions, as hereinbefore defined; (d) to establish from time to time, subject to review and determination of the Federal Reserve Board, rates of discount to be charged by the Federal reserve bank for each class of paper, which shall be fixed with a view of accommodating commerce and business; (e) to establish accounts with other Federal reserve banks for exchange purposes and, with the consent of the Federal Reserve Board, to open and maintain banking accounts in foreign countries, appoint correspondents, and establish agencies in such countries wheresoever it may deem best for the purpose of purchasing, selling, and collecting bills of exchange, and to buy and sell with or without its endorsement, through such correspondents or agencies, bills of exchange arising out of actual commercial transactions which have not more than ninety days to run and which bear the signature of two or more responsible parties."

Section 14b was amended in the Monetary Control Act of 1980 to expressly grant the Fed the authority to invest in "short-term foreign government securities," though the Fed’s questionable legal basis for acquiring foreign currency in the first place has never been remedied by Congressional legislation.

Source: Morgan Stanley
<!--
Source (http://www.morganstanley.com/GEFdata/digests/20020718-thu.html)
-->
<hr>
The Fed is allowed to buy certain short-term private instruments, such as bankers' acceptances, that are not much used today. It is also permitted to make IPC (individual, partnership, and corporation) loans directly to the private sector, but only under stringent criteria. This latter power has not been used since the Great Depression but could be invoked in an emergency deemed sufficiently serious by the Board of Governors.
...
Therefore a second policy option, complementary to operating in the markets for Treasury and agency debt, would be for the Fed to offer fixed-term loans to banks at low or zero interest, with a wide range of private assets (including, among others, corporate bonds, commercial paper, bank loans, and mortgages) deemed eligible as collateral ( By statute, the Fed has considerable leeway to determine what assets to accept as collateral.). For example, the Fed might make 90-day or 180-day zero-interest loans to banks, taking corporate commercial paper of the same maturity as collateral. Pursued aggressively, such a program could significantly reduce liquidity and term premiums on the assets used as collateral. Reductions in these premiums would lower the cost of capital both to banks and the nonbank private sector, over and above the beneficial effect already conferred by lower interest rates on government securities.
...
... the Fed could of course always go to the Congress to ask for the requisite powers to buy private assets.

Source (http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2002/20021121/default.htm)

Federal Reserve Act of 1913 (http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/fract/), in full
<hr>
(Not strictly part of the Fed itself, but interesting nonetheless)

"The shocking revelation yesterday that governors of the Federal Reserve system are free to trade in US equities - and one would assume US Treasuries - is another slice off the confidence block."
Source (http://www.jsmineset.com/), editorial of Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 7:46:00 PM EST
(last update Oct 2005)

grapejelly
07-31-08, 05:13 PM
awesome, can't absorb it all at once, awesome. Thanks

bart
07-31-08, 05:37 PM
awesome, can't absorb it all at once, awesome. Thanks

You're most welcome.

It's undoubtedly the most diverse and eclectic page I've ever written.
"Miscellaneous to the max, hand onto your hat" is probably a better title. ;)

FRED
08-01-08, 08:39 AM
Excellent! Surprised by your "How is money created in the U.S.?" definition, however.

Most money in the US is borrowed into existance via the magic of double entry bookkeeping wherein your liability becomes the lender's asset the moment you borrow. For example, when a home is purchased and a new mortgage is taken out, a new car is purchased and new car loan is taken out, a credit card purchase is made, stocks are purchased from a brokerage account on credit, a home equity line of credit is taken out, and so on. As Galbairth said, "The process is so simple the mind is repelled." The money thus created then goes into the economy where it circulates forever, and is only extinguished bit by bit.

bart
08-01-08, 09:41 AM
Excellent! Surprised by your "How is money created in the U.S.?" definition, however.

Most money in the US is borrowed into existence via the magic of double entry bookkeeping wherein your liability becomes the lender's asset the moment you borrow. For example, when a home is purchased and a new mortgage is taken out, a new car is purchased and new car loan is taken out, a credit card purchase is made, stocks are purchased from a brokerage account on credit, a home equity line of credit is taken out, and so on. As Galbairth said, "The process is so simple the mind is repelled." The money thus created then goes into the economy where it circulates forever, and is only extinguished bit by bit.

Verily & forsooth, oh maven of mavens.

As written, my description does undervalue borrowing although I plead extenuating circumstances (and anything else that might help get me off the hook ;) ). There's so much complexity to all the ways that money can be created that I chose to not add in a lot about fractional reserve and instead used a glossary link. It does inadvertently lessen how important factional reserve really is.

That first entry of fractional reserve banking does lead to:
Fractional reserve banking
The practice of banks of retaining only a fraction of their deposits to satisfy demands for withdrawals, and then potentially loaning out the remainder.
This practice allows the banking system to actually "create" money, since if they only have to retain 10% of a deposit the other 90% can be loaned out, and then 90% of that 90% (81% of the original) can be loaned out when its deposited in another bank account by the borrower. And then 90% of that 81% can be loaned out, creating more money... and so on as deposits are made in other banks of the borrowed amount. In effect, one dollar deposited can allow a bank to create at least eight dollars of money (.90 + .81 + .73 + .66 + .59... adds up to over eight).

Diagram it out on paper if you're having trouble, it is a pretty squirrely process to understand. More data and a fuller explanation is available here (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deposit_creation_multiplier).

Now you also know why banking can be so profitable. From an original $1,000 deposit and overly simplying it, they can loan out at least another $8,000. If the interest rate is 6%, that means the income per year on that $8,000 is $480 (6% of $8,000 is $480)... not a bad deal getting a $480 income per year on a $1,000 "investment".

Two last points... as of 2005, the actual fraction is much lower than 10%. Depending on which deposits are counted, the fraction is between 1% to about 6.5%. Also, most banks do not loan up to their maximum reserves - that and other factors mean that they do not create anywhere near $8 for every $1 of deposits as the example above implies.
Wikipedia entry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional-reserve_banking), for more detail and explanation




And hopefully for a bit more clarity, here's a newer chart that's a best efforts attempt to show what the actual commercial bank fractional reserve ratio is, both now and for the last few decades.

http://www.nowandfutures.com/images/required_reserves_ratio.png

Lukester
08-01-08, 10:46 PM
What did the barista sprinkle in your quadruple espresso coffee slug this morning? :D This is soaring, far ranging stuff Bart, you seem to be flying at about 45,000 feet today. Nobody else here sits around quiet for months and then "burps" up this kind of "general guide to surviving the 21st century" on a Friday afternoon as though out of a trance. Yeesh, I'm wondering if the Bartos is really that mythical two headed Cerberus after all? :eek: I thought it was just an apochryphal hound carved out of mossy stone.

bart
08-01-08, 11:04 PM
What did the barista sprinkle in your quadruple espresso coffee slug this morning? :D This is soaring, far ranging stuff Bart, you seem to be flying at about 45,000 feet today. Nobody else here sits around quiet for months and then "burps" up this kind of "general guide to surviving the 21st century" on a Friday afternoon as though out of a trance. Yeesh, I'm wondering if the Bartos is really that mythical two headed Cerberus after all? :eek: I thought it was just an apochryphal hound carved out of mossy stone.


sssshhhh... I thought you promised to keep that secret... :eek:
http://www.nowandfutures.com/grins/twilightzone.mid ;)


It's lots simpler than that. All I've been doing for weeks now is just copying & pasting various pages from my site to here. The iTulip interface makes it a complete breeze.

Lukester
08-01-08, 11:32 PM
Great stuff Bart, thank you for sharing these with all here. And I also wonder what your impression of Bensimon's work has been? .

bart
08-02-08, 12:23 PM
Great stuff Bart, thank you for sharing these with all here. And I also wonder what your impression of Bensimon's work has been? .

My pleasure Lukester.

Bensimon does seem to have a quite decent longer term record of calls and also seems to neither be arrogant nor excessively self effacing.
He does blow it sometimes too, as this shows:
http://home.comcast.net/~Haytham/DavidBensiman.bmp (http://home.comcast.net/%7EHaytham/DavidBensiman.bmp)
But he corrected it shortly thereafter.

Here's a video of him on CNBC Asia in Feb calling correctly for a March bottom:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/15840232?video=648408040

And a more recent one about his oil call:
http://www.blinkx.com/video/polar-pacific-bensimon-says-oil-prices-are-peaking/4u9hHYjRzXQTTgsN042faQ

Bottom line, much like EJ and others like Rogers or Schultz or Faber, his track record makes him someone to watch.

Thanks for bringing him up and onto my radar screen. He is more of a trader than most here though.

Rajiv
08-02-08, 01:55 PM
Do you have anything on conspiracies besides Bilderberger stuff?

"The only conspiracy that matters is the conspiracy of the psychopaths against the rest of us."
Twilight of the psychopaths (http://www.agoracosmopolitan.com/home/Frontpage/2008/01/02/02073.html)


From Twilight of the psychopaths

Psychopaths have played a disproportionate role in the development of civilization, because they are hard-wired to lie, kill, injure, and generally inflict great suffering on other humans without feeling any remorse. The inventor of civilization — the first tribal chieftain who successfully brainwashed an army of controlled mass murderers—was almost certainly a genetic psychopath. Since that momentous discovery, psychopaths have enjoyed a significant advantage over non-psychopaths in the struggle for power in civilizational hierarchies — especially military hierarchies.Have you read "Political Ponerology (http://ponerology.com/)?"

Political Ponerology is a study of the founders and supporters of oppressive political regimes. Lobaczewski’s approach analyzes the common factors that lead to the propagation of man’s inhumanity to man. Morality and humanism cannot long withstand the predations of this evil. Knowledge of its nature – and its insidious effect on both individuals and groups - is the only antidote.

PONEROLOGY: THE STUDY OF EVIL

“In the author’s opinion, Ponerology reveals itself to be a new branch of science born out of historical need and the most recent accomplishments of medicine and psychology. In light of objective naturalistic language, it studies the causal components and processes of the genesis of evil, regardless of the latter’s social scope. We may attempt to analyze these ponerogenic processes which have given rise to human injustice, armed with proper knowledge, particularly in the area of psychopathology. Again and again, as the reader will discover, in such a study, we meet with the effects of pathological factors whose carriers are people characterized by some degree of various psychological deviations or defects.” (Lobaczewski, 42)
.
.
.
.
“Experience has taught the author that evil is similar to disease in nature, although possibly more complex and elusive to our understanding. Its genesis reveals many factors, pathological, especially psychopathological, in character, whose essence medicine and psychology have already studied… [A] comprehension of the essence and genesis of evil generally makes use of data from [biology, medicine, and psychology]. Philosophical reflection alone is insufficient.” (Lobaczewski, 98)

Like a color blind man incapable of distinguishing red from green, a small minority of the human population cannot experience or fully comprehend the normal range of human emotions. And like those color blind who may conceal their condition by using the correct words while not understanding their meaning (e.g., the top traffic light is “red”, the bottom is “green”) - so does this minority conceal their condition by playacting an emotion's exterior signs (facial expressions, exclamations, body language). However, they do no actually experience the emotion in question. Their deception is revealed in the laboratory, where they respond to words like DEATH, CANCER, DISEASE, as if they were DAY, CREAM, or PAPER. They lack the ability to comprehend the emotional “punch” that certain words contain. They use others’ emotional reactions as cues, and they adjust their behavior to portray the correct ‘emotional’ behavior. (Hare, 129-30)

These individuals are known as psychopaths. Not only can they not feel the pain of others, they often seem to deliberately cause others pain. Lobaczewski refers to this disorder as an “essential psychopathy” to distinguish them from others with deficits in their genetic/instinctual endowment, essential psychopathy being the most severe and disturbing.

Many so-called “antisocial individuals” acquire similar characteristics in their life-time, whether caused by brain damage to certain areas of the brain, or functionally, because of close contact with and influence by such individuals. Lobaczewski terms such individuals characteropaths. The vast majority of both these groups cannot change. The acts that we call evil (especially on a macrosocial level) can be traced back to this deviant minority of human beings and the effects of their actions on their family, friends, and society.
.
.
.
PSYCHOPATHY: THE CAUSE OF EVIL

Inherited and acquired psychological disorders and ignorance of their existence and nature are the primal causes of evil. The magic number of 6% seems to represent the number of humans who either carry the genes responsible for biological evil or who acquire such disorders in the course of their lifetime. This small percent is responsible for the vast majority of human misery and crime, and for infecting others with their flawed view of the world.

The scope of evil does not respect any boundaries of race, doctrine, or ideology. All races carry the genes, and all schools of thought are susceptible to their influence. These pathological factors that influence behaviour form a complex web. It is only in such a web that the "environmental evil" wherein circumstances can influence a normal person to commit harmful acts can be understood.
.
.
.
.
While a moral sense (lacking in psychopaths) can be seen as necessary to be held morally responsible, that is not to say that psychopaths should have free rein to destroy lives. Psychopathic individuals can have a number of effects on normal people: they can fascinate, traumatize, cause pathological personality development, or inspire vindictive emotions (a result of viewing evil as simply a "choice"). An example of this variety can be seen in the host of groupies, pen pals, supporters, and love-struck fans that flocks towards dangerous serial killers like Richard Ramirez and Ted Bundy. One fan of Ramirez said, "When I look at him, I see a real handsome guy who just messed up his life because he never had anyone to guide him."

These effects and the confusion they engender can then lead to, and reinforce our collective ignorance of such individuals. We rarely hold responsible the individual who influences another to commit evil, but instead moralistically punish only the agent of an act. The true cause of 'evil' actions goes unpunished, much like an Army Private punished for the crimes of his superiors. In fact, the true source of 'evil' may be separated from a specific action by both vast stretches in time (i.e., in literature and tradition) and by large distances (i.e., by mass media).

bart
08-02-08, 03:48 PM
From Twilight of the psychopaths
...

Have you read "Political Ponerology (http://ponerology.com/)?"

...

Political Ponerology is a study of the founders and supporters of oppressive political regimes. Lobaczewski’s approach analyzes the common factors that lead to the propagation of man’s inhumanity to man. Morality and humanism cannot long withstand the predations of this evil. Knowledge of its nature – and its insidious effect on both individuals and groups - is the only antidote.

Spot on Rajiv, and no I was not aware of Ponerology. Thanks for the heads up. There's a clear definition in the interview on your link:
Ponerology is the theological study of evil, derived from poneros in New Testament Greek, which implies an inborn evil with a corrupting influence.

This very general area is the basis of the philosophical(?) disagreement between EJ and I in his "Jocks vs. Geeks" model. Its not that "Jocks vs. Geeks" is wrong either - it just doesn't go far enough in my opinion.

"Evil" people truly do exist and of course some are way more evil than others... and I'll avoid Godwin's Law ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_Law ) too. ;)

Until such time as we can reliably & consistently identify them early, via education and other ways and means, and then agree upon and develop ways of controlling them so their effects are minimized, we as the human race will continue to be plagued with these various cycles, one of which is EJ's KaPoom.

"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that men of good will do nothing."
-- Cicero

It's far from "all black" too - many folk are aware of the area intuitively and there is much going on in the background too... and stay tuned for my next tinfoil hat sale. ;)

bart
08-02-08, 03:54 PM
And here's some short fun videos that pick on bankers (not that humor isn't needed too). :cool:

http://www.bankerspank.com/table.html

http://www.bankerspank.com/blow.html

http://www.bankerspank.com/index.html

http://www.bankerspank.com/serve.html

Rajiv
08-02-08, 05:00 PM
These videos seem to compare banks to credit unions

Aren't credit unions in similar trouble to the banks as well? With regards to the real estate bust?

This article seems to claim that they are not
No Credit Crunch At Credit Unions (http://www.sandiegometro.com/2008/jul/creditunion.php)

in particular credit unions, remain in overall good health.

Evidence of this is available in a report by the California Credit Union League. Summarizing 2007, the league found that assets at California CUs grew by 3.93 percent, off only about 0.5 percent from the robust 4.5 percent in 2006. First mortgages grew by 13 percent, and other real estate loans grew by almost 9 percent. OK, maybe California was late to the funeral. But no: nationally, first mortgage loans at CUs grew more than 15 percent. More impressive still was CUs’ delinquent loan portfolio, which by AP standards, should be “spinning out of control.” Instead, delinquencies rose 0.26 percent, and are still less than 1 percent.

Coupling that with a charge off to average loans ratio of 0.51 percent, up a mere 0.06 percent over the previous year, the CCUL concluded, “Credit unions are exhibiting impressive financial strength.”
.
.
.
So what happened? After all, if the national economy is 70 percent dependent on consumer spending and is in the emergency room, credit unions — which are nearly 100 percent dependent on consumers — should be in intensive care.

Actually, like the 94 percent of homeowners whose mortgages are not in default, most credit unions did not overextend and now are reaping the benefit.

“Credit unions didn’t change their lending structure to meet the boom market,” says Daniel Penrod, industry analyst at the CCUL, which represents about 500 credit unions throughout the state. “We didn’t loosen our lending criteria, and we didn’t suffer the losses banks did. So, while credit unions didn’t make as much hay as the banks did when the sun was shining, when the rains came, we didn’t get as wet. As a result, it’s more or less business as usual.”


So the question is wouldn't the credit unions be hurt with the increasing foreclosures, and hence the decline in real estate values?

bart
08-02-08, 07:49 PM
These videos seem to compare banks to credit unions

Aren't credit unions in similar trouble to the banks as well? With regards to the real estate bust?

This article seems to claim that they are not
No Credit Crunch At Credit Unions (http://www.sandiegometro.com/2008/jul/creditunion.php)

...

So the question is wouldn't the credit unions be hurt with the increasing foreclosures, and hence the decline in real estate values?

I can't imagine them getting away scot free, but it does seem from that link that they'll miss most of the problems since they kept their loan standards high, and didn't go heavily into alt-a, sub prime etc. Due to their structure, the profit motive isn't there like with banks, I'd bet that there is no such thing as off balance sheet assets with them, and their vested interests seem to tend not to encourage risky behavior - and I'm far from expert in the area.

And besides, those videos had me cackling a bit. :cool: