PDA

View Full Version : Taleb Kills $20 Billion Mythical Swan - Janet Tavakoli


FRED
06-01-09, 08:36 AM
http://www.itulip.com/images/greenswanMED.jpgTaleb Kills $20 Billion Mythical Swan

By Janet Tavakoli

A recent GQ article quoted Nassim Nicholas Taleb as saying that in the falling market he “made $20 billion for our clients, half a billion for the Black Swan fund.” (1)

I checked with Nassim Taleb regarding the $20 billion in gains and asked if he were misquoted. He responded via email: “The quote is inaccurate. THe [sic] 20 billion might correspond to the face value of positions.” This response is both vague and different in character from the mythical $20 billion in gains inaccurately quoted in GQ’s article. The total gains could be a tiny fraction of what Taleb loosely describes as “face value.” (2)

Why is GQ’s mistake important? In my opinion, public claims of enormous private hedge fund gains require credible back up, and one would think that GQ would have known that before it inaccurately quoted Taleb as having made a bell ringing gain of $20 billion for clients. Presumably, the error referred to outside clients, not the black swan fund itself, but it could have the side effect of attracting investors to the black swan fund, similar to advertising or salesmanship.

The black swan fund’s strategy is purportedly to buy out-of-the-money put options on stocks and broad market indices and hedge tail risk for clients. The strategy may produce long periods of mediocre—or even negative—returns followed by a large gain and vice versa. No one can tell you for certain exactly when (or for how long) large gains are possible. Initial success in a newly created fund may not be replicated in the future, and there is always the problem of scaling. Scaling refers to the fact that an individual fund may make a high return on an initial investment, say 100% on $100 million, but lose 10% on $1 billion.

The Market Can Stay Irrational Longer Than You Can Stay Solvent (or Patient)

We know that big unanticipated market moves always result in big winners and big losers. After the fact, many winners claim they were smart—not just lucky.

In my opinion, any claim of enormous gains for any strategy—including a black swan fund—should be explained and balanced with caveats. The siren song of enormous gains is always enticing, but the actual swan song may be off key.

A black swan fund strategy may produce future huge gains, but it may also produce mediocre returns (or even slowly burn cash for long periods) before producing another huge gain. The waiting period for the next big payday could be brief, or it could be longer than your investment horizon.

--

(1) “I went for the jugular—we went for the max. I was interested in screwing these people—I’m not interested in money, but I wanted to teach them a lesson, and the only way you can do it is by trying to take it away from them. We didn’t short the banks—there’s not much to be gained there, these were all these complex instruments, options and so forth. We’d been building our positions for a while…when they went to the wall we made $20 bln for our clients, half a billion for the Black Swan fund.” (First page, second column, 7th full paragraph of “The Thinker, (PDF) (http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/GQ.pdf)” GQ UK edition, May 2009)

(2) Taleb’s web site fooledbyrandomeness.com (http://www.fooledbyrandomness.com/) home page showed this article as one of two “most representative overall profiles.” After my query, Taleb added a qualifier next to the link to the article: “(with typo on the ‘billions’).”

Hat tip to alert readers and Chicago’s option market makers. Thanks also to Nassim Taleb for confirming the inaccuracy of the quote. Will Self, the author of the GQ article, did not respond to an email sent to his agency.

See Eric Janszen Interviews Janet Tavakoli, President of Tavakoli Structured Finance ($ubscription) (http://www.itulip.com/forums/showthread.php?p=100974#post100974), May 2009

Janet Tavakoli is the president of Tavakoli Structured Finance (http://www.tavakolistructuredfinance.com/), a Chicago-based firm that provides consulting to financial institutions and institutional investors. Ms. Tavakoli has more than 20 years of experience in senior investment banking positions, trading, structuring and marketing structured financial products. She is a former adjunct associate professor of derivatives at the University of Chicago's Graduate School of Business. Author of numerous books, including: Dear Mr. Buffett: What An Investor Learns 1,269 Miles From Wall Street (http://www.amazon.com/Dear-Mr-Buffett-Investor-Learns/dp/047040678X/ref=pd_bbs_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1221917976&sr=8-4) <http: www.amazon.com="" dear-mr-buffett-investor-learns="" dp="" 047040678x="" ref="pd_bbs_4?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1221917976&sr=8-4"> (Wiley, 2009).

iTulip Select (http://www.itulip.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1032): The Investment Thesis for the Next Cycle™
__________________________________________________

To receive the iTulip Newsletter or iTulip Alerts, Join our FREE Email Mailing List (http://ui.constantcontact.com/d.jsp?m=1101238839116&p=oi)

Copyright © iTulip, Inc. 1998 - 2009 All Rights Reserved

All information provided "as is" for informational purposes only, not intended for trading purposes or advice. Nothing appearing on this website should be considered a recommendation to buy or to sell any security or related financial instrument. iTulip, Inc. is not liable for any informational errors, incompleteness, or delays, or for any actions taken in reliance on information contained herein. Full Disclaimer (http://www.itulip.com/forums/../GeneralDisclaimer.htm)
</http:>

cjppjc
06-01-09, 10:35 AM
Thanks for this. I hope Janet T will continue to contribute. I am very expert in the real life application of The Market Can Stay Irrational Longer Than You Can Stay Solvent. Having bet againts the GSEs only to watch their share price not drop,:eek:

icm63
06-01-09, 01:30 PM
White Swan - seen it !
Black Swan - seen it !
Ginger Swan - ??????

Is this grounds for another book, 'the ginger swan event' !

EJ, Ed and Fred thats the title for you next book before Taleb get it !

ha ha :)

jk
06-01-09, 02:42 PM
taleb made clear in "fooled by randomness" that he thought fat-tail risk was underpriced. i.e. rare events happen more often than people think [but not so frequently that they lose the classification of rare]. thus a strategy of buying out of the money puts would lose a small trickle of money most of the time, but on rare occasions it would pay off so well it would justify the strategy.

Master Shake
06-01-09, 03:56 PM
I get the distinct impression that Ms. Tavakoli doesn't care much for NNT.

EJ
06-01-09, 08:23 PM
I get the distinct impression that Ms. Tavakoli doesn't care much for NNT.

Teleb appears to believe that corruption is random.

jimmygu3
06-01-09, 10:00 PM
We know that big unanticipated market moves always result in big winners and big losers. After the fact, many winners claim they were smart—not just lucky. </HTTP:>


I'm reminded of 1998's top mutual fund, Internet Fund (http://www.thestreet.com/funds/funds/519899.html), which gained 196% that year.

Chris Coles
06-02-09, 02:11 AM
I checked with Nassim Taleb regarding the $20 billion in gains and asked if he were misquoted. He responded via email: “The quote is inaccurate. THe [sic] 20 billion might correspond to the face value of positions.” This response is both vague and different in character from the mythical $20 billion in gains inaccurately quoted in GQ’s article. The total gains could be a tiny fraction of what Taleb loosely describes as “face value.” (2)

Why is GQ’s mistake important? In my opinion, public claims of enormous private hedge fund gains require credible back up, and one would think that GQ would have known that before it inaccurately quoted Taleb as having made a bell ringing gain of $20 billion for clients. Presumably, the error referred to outside clients, not the black swan fund itself, but it could have the side effect of attracting investors to the black swan fund, similar to advertising or salesmanship.

While I do appreciate the humour of the ongoing debate, surely this example of, shall we say, "glossing over the details", is in fact a Federal Offence that should be investigated and if substantiated, brought to a Court of the Law and if found guilty, the instigator should be thrown into a jail and the key ceremonially thrown away?

Chief Tomahawk
06-02-09, 07:26 AM
Thanks for being a breath of fresh air, Janet!:)

rchdenton
06-02-09, 03:49 PM
The media are a scary bunch, even if they like you they are not very good at getting the facts straight, let alone the viewpoint. Much better to get the facts direct from someone who understands the subject - thank you Janet.

On a lighter note black swans are common down here, we have large flocks of them. Is there a deeper meaning hidden in this? Probably not but I found a nice photo:

file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/rd/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot.jpgfile:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/rd/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-1.jpg
http://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/01/1a/2f/25/black-swans-on-okarita.jpg

metalman
06-02-09, 04:35 PM
The media are a scary bunch, even if they like you they are not very good at getting the facts straight, let alone the viewpoint. Much better to get the facts direct from someone who understands the subject - thank you Janet.

On a lighter note black swans are common down here, we have large flocks of them. Is there a deeper meaning hidden in this? Probably not but I found a nice photo:

file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/rd/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot.jpgfile:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/rd/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-1.jpg


yeh. not only that, but to get the right answers someone has to ask the right questions.